<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liberal Whoppers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com</link>
	<description>The truth without the spin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:36:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Obama calls black people &#8216;a mongrel people&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/obama-calls-black-people-a-mongrel-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/obama-calls-black-people-a-mongrel-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/obama-calls-black-people-a-mongrel-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A curious anthropological comment by the president.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A curious anthropological comment by the president.</p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/obama_calls_black_people_a_mon.html" title="Obama calls black people 'a mongrel people'">Obama calls black people &#8216;a mongrel people&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/obama-calls-black-people-a-mongrel-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Post sees only Israel as obstacle to peace</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-post-sees-only-israel-as-obstacle-to-peace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-post-sees-only-israel-as-obstacle-to-peace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leo rennert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-post-sees-only-israel-as-obstacle-to-peace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hardly evenhanded coverage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hardly evenhanded coverage.</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/the_post_sees_only_israel_as_o.html" title="The Post sees only Israel as obstacle to peace">The Post sees only Israel as obstacle to peace</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-post-sees-only-israel-as-obstacle-to-peace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greetings from the UN!</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/greetings-from-the-un/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/greetings-from-the-un/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ralph alter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/greetings-from-the-un/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you been scammed by the UN?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you been scammed by the UN?</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/greetings_from_the_un.html" title="Greetings from the UN!">Greetings from the UN!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/greetings-from-the-un/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disgraced Blumenthal leads in Connecticut senate race</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/disgraced-blumenthal-leads-in-connecticut-senate-race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/disgraced-blumenthal-leads-in-connecticut-senate-race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greg halvorson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/disgraced-blumenthal-leads-in-connecticut-senate-race/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[America has swapped virtue for vice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America has swapped virtue for vice.</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/disgraced_blumenthal_leads_in.html" title="Disgraced Blumenthal leads in Connecticut senate race">Disgraced Blumenthal leads in Connecticut senate race</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/disgraced-blumenthal-leads-in-connecticut-senate-race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stupidity is what stupidity writes</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/stupidity-is-what-stupidity-writes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/stupidity-is-what-stupidity-writes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/stupidity-is-what-stupidity-writes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ E . J. Dionne Jr has an op-ed out entitled , “In American politics, stupidty is the name of the game.” After reading the piece, I am pretty convinced it should be re-titled “In American punditry, stupidity is the name of the game.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> E . J. Dionne Jr has an op-ed out entitled , “In American politics, stupidty is the name of the game.” After reading the piece, I am pretty convinced it should be re-titled “In American punditry, stupidity is the name of the game.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/stupidity-is-what-stupidity-writes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House vetting proves once again to be flawed</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/white-house-vetting-proves-once-again-to-be-flawed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/white-house-vetting-proves-once-again-to-be-flawed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asshats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/white-house-vetting-proves-once-again-to-be-flawed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A human prop used to make a political point is shown to be a little too human:In his daily press briefing Thursday afternoon, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said the White... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A human prop used to make a political point is shown to be a little too human:In his daily press briefing Thursday afternoon, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said the White&#8230; </p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wizbangblog.com/~r/Wizbang/~3/1wv-JXXM6j4/white-house-vetting-proves-once-again-to-be-flawed.php" title="White House vetting proves once again to be flawed">White House vetting proves once again to be flawed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/white-house-vetting-proves-once-again-to-be-flawed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professor Howell offered job back</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/professor-howell-offered-job-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/professor-howell-offered-job-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christianity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/professor-howell-offered-job-back/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two days ago, I picked up the story of the University of Illinois professor who was fired for allegedly engaging in hate speech in an email to his students where... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two days ago, I picked up the story of the University of Illinois professor who was fired for allegedly engaging in hate speech in an email to his students where&#8230; </p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wizbangblog.com/~r/Wizbang/~3/SwbnZUqoUnw/professor-howell-offered-job-back.php" title="Professor Howell offered job back">Professor Howell offered job back</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/professor-howell-offered-job-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time Helps Jerry Brown Sell False Image as &#8216;Budget Hawk&#8217; Who &#8216;Never Raised Taxes&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/time-helps-jerry-brown-sell-false-image-as-budget-hawk-who-never-raised-taxes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/time-helps-jerry-brown-sell-false-image-as-budget-hawk-who-never-raised-taxes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/time-helps-jerry-brown-sell-false-image-as-budget-hawk-who-never-raised-taxes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Jerry Brown was known as "Governor Moonbeam" in the 1970s, and ran for president from the left three times (to the left of Jimmy Carter in 1976 and 1980, and to the left of Bill Clinton in 1992). But now that he's running for governor again, Time magazine is trying to convince its readers he's really a centrist. In the August 2 magazine, reporter Karl Taro Greenfeld helpfully laid out Brown's case that he's a penny-pinching budget hawk: He was never as eccentric as his Governor Moonbeam reputation would suggest. He was a budget hawk before that term was fashionable: he rejected the governor's mansion to live in a Sacramento apartment, was chauffered in a in a Plymouth Galaxy instead of ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Jerry Brown was known as &#8220;Governor Moonbeam&#8221; in the 1970s, and ran for president from the left three times (to the left of Jimmy Carter in 1976 and 1980, and to the left of Bill Clinton in 1992). But now that he&#8217;s running for governor again, Time magazine is trying to convince its readers he&#8217;s really a centrist. In the August 2 magazine, reporter Karl Taro Greenfeld helpfully laid out Brown&#8217;s case that he&#8217;s a penny-pinching budget hawk: He was never as eccentric as his Governor Moonbeam reputation would suggest. He was a budget hawk before that term was fashionable: he rejected the governor&#8217;s mansion to live in a Sacramento apartment, was chauffered in a in a Plymouth Galaxy instead of &#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2010/07/30/time-helps-jerry-brown-sell-false-image-budget-hawk-who-never-raised-tax" title="Time Helps Jerry Brown Sell False Image as 'Budget Hawk' Who 'Never Raised Taxes'">Time Helps Jerry Brown Sell False Image as &#8216;Budget Hawk&#8217; Who &#8216;Never Raised Taxes&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/time-helps-jerry-brown-sell-false-image-as-budget-hawk-who-never-raised-taxes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Briefing for July 30, 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/morning-briefing-for-july-30-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/morning-briefing-for-july-30-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/morning-briefing-for-july-30-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ RedState Morning Briefing For July 30, 2010 Go to www.RedStateMB.com to get the Morning Briefing every morning at no charge. 1. Real Change: Faith in Government Collapses Under Obama 2. Why a Federal Grand Jury Could Put Georgia’s Governor’s Mansion in Democrat Hands 3. Sharron Angle is in a Good Position Against Harry Reid 4. Democrats Underestimate the American People Once Again 5. Oil spill update. 6. No, The Thumpin’ is/was not inevitable. 7. The Bizarro World of San Fran Nan and the House Dems &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- 1. Real Change: Faith in Government Collapses Under Obama President Obama and the current Congressional leadership were swept into office on a wave of dissatisfaction with George Bush and a Republican ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> RedState Morning Briefing For July 30, 2010 Go to www.RedStateMB.com to get the Morning Briefing every morning at no charge. 1. Real Change: Faith in Government Collapses Under Obama 2. Why a Federal Grand Jury Could Put Georgia’s Governor’s Mansion in Democrat Hands 3. Sharron Angle is in a Good Position Against Harry Reid 4. Democrats Underestimate the American People Once Again 5. Oil spill update. 6. No, The Thumpin’ is/was not inevitable. 7. The Bizarro World of San Fran Nan and the House Dems &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;- 1. Real Change: Faith in Government Collapses Under Obama President Obama and the current Congressional leadership were swept into office on a wave of dissatisfaction with George Bush and a Republican &#8230;</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2010/07/30/morning-briefing-for-july-30-2010/" title="Morning Briefing for July 30, 2010">Morning Briefing for July 30, 2010</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/morning-briefing-for-july-30-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. King: Obama Must Confront Islamic Terror</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/rep-king-obama-must-confront-islamic-terror/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/rep-king-obama-must-confront-islamic-terror/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/rep-king-obama-must-confront-islamic-terror/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Read this article:
Rep. King: Obama Must Confront Islamic Terror
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/king-obama-islamic-terror-mosque-new-york-ground-zero/2010/07/29/id/366069" title="Rep. King: Obama Must Confront Islamic Terror">Rep. King: Obama Must Confront Islamic Terror</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/rep-king-obama-must-confront-islamic-terror/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Second Amendment and Unmarked Firearms</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-second-amendment-and-unmarked-firearms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-second-amendment-and-unmarked-firearms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-second-amendment-and-unmarked-firearms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Orin Kerr) The Third Circuit has handed down an interesting Second Amendment decision, United States v. Marzzarella . It begins: This appeal presents a single issue, whether Defendant Michael Marzzarella’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(k) for possession of a handgun with an obliterated serial number violates his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. We hold it does not and accordingly will affirm the conviction. From the opinion: The District Court could not identify, and Marzzarella does not assert, any lawful purpose served by obliterating a serial number on ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Orin Kerr) The Third Circuit has handed down an interesting Second Amendment decision, United States v. Marzzarella . It begins: This appeal presents a single issue, whether Defendant Michael Marzzarella’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(k) for possession of a handgun with an obliterated serial number violates his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. We hold it does not and accordingly will affirm the conviction. From the opinion: The District Court could not identify, and Marzzarella does not assert, any lawful purpose served by obliterating a serial number on &#8230;</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/volokh/mainfeed/~3/MhE2vzJ_xrA/" title="The Second Amendment and Unmarked Firearms">The Second Amendment and Unmarked Firearms</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-second-amendment-and-unmarked-firearms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Mean Streak</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/obamas-mean-streak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/obamas-mean-streak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ed lasky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/obamas-mean-streak/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama seems to have a pattern of using ceremonial or stately events as opportunities to ambush and humiliate people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama seems to have a pattern of using ceremonial or stately events as opportunities to ambush and humiliate people.</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/obamas_mean_streak_1.html" title="Obama's Mean Streak">Obama&#8217;s Mean Streak</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/obamas-mean-streak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obama Victory Reconsidered</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-obama-victory-reconsidered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-obama-victory-reconsidered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard baehr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-obama-victory-reconsidered/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama's presidential election victory in 2008 represents the most successful new product introduction in American history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama&#8217;s presidential election victory in 2008 represents the most successful new product introduction in American history.</p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/the_obama_victory_reconsidered.html" title="The Obama Victory Reconsidered">The Obama Victory Reconsidered</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-obama-victory-reconsidered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Sherrod Story Still Untold</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/real-sherrod-story-still-untold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/real-sherrod-story-still-untold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jack cashill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/real-sherrod-story-still-untold/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numbers tell the story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers tell the story.</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/real_sherrod_story_still_untol.html" title="Real Sherrod Story Still Untold">Real Sherrod Story Still Untold</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/real-sherrod-story-still-untold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Thunder and the Firecracker</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-thunder-and-the-firecracker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-thunder-and-the-firecracker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timothy birdnow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-thunder-and-the-firecracker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Solar winds, spacequakes, and "global warming."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solar winds, spacequakes, and &#8220;global warming.&#8221;</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/the_thunder_and_the_firecracke.html" title="The Thunder and the Firecracker">The Thunder and the Firecracker</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-thunder-and-the-firecracker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the Electoral College Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/why-the-electoral-college-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/why-the-electoral-college-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/why-the-electoral-college-matters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A campaign to circumvent the Elector College is underway, and it must be resisted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A campaign to circumvent the Elector College is underway, and it must be resisted.</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/why_the_electoral_college_matt.html" title="Why the Electoral College Matters">Why the Electoral College Matters</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/why-the-electoral-college-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s Unspeakable Truth</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/americas-unspeakable-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/americas-unspeakable-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rob cunningham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/americas-unspeakable-truth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time to face up to the awful truth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to face up to the awful truth</p>
<p>Read more from the original source:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/americas_unspeakable_truth.html" title="America's Unspeakable Truth">America&#8217;s Unspeakable Truth</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/americas-unspeakable-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gen. Jones is Not a Useful Idiot</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/gen-jones-is-not-a-useful-idiot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/gen-jones-is-not-a-useful-idiot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ken blackwell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/gen-jones-is-not-a-useful-idiot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our friends, the Russians.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our friends, the Russians.</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/gen_jones_is_not_a_useful_idio.html" title="Gen. Jones is Not a Useful Idiot">Gen. Jones is Not a Useful Idiot</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/gen-jones-is-not-a-useful-idiot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mom Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-mom-thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-mom-thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 06:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f. owen smith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-mom-thing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arlington National Cemetery is the biggest "mom thing" there is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arlington National Cemetery is the biggest &#8220;mom thing&#8221; there is.</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/07/the_mom_thing.html" title="The Mom Thing">The Mom Thing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-mom-thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ABC Leads by Trumpeting ‘Anger in the Streets’ from ‘Hundreds’ in Phoenix</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/abc-leads-by-trumpeting-%e2%80%98anger-in-the-streets%e2%80%99-from-%e2%80%98hundreds%e2%80%99-in-phoenix/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/abc-leads-by-trumpeting-%e2%80%98anger-in-the-streets%e2%80%99-from-%e2%80%98hundreds%e2%80%99-in-phoenix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/abc-leads-by-trumpeting-%e2%80%98anger-in-the-streets%e2%80%99-from-%e2%80%98hundreds%e2%80%99-in-phoenix/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ “Anger in the streets and we’re there for the protests,” ABC anchor Diane Sawyer teased in making reaction from a few opposed to Arizona’s immigration enforcement efforts her top story on Thursday night. She led: “Emboldened by a judge's rebuke of that law yesterday, hundreds of opponents of the crackdown took to the streets today. But the state's unyielding Governor stood by the law.” ABC’s Barbara Pinto touted over video which included a protester waving a Che Guevara flag: Demonstrations started at dawn – hundreds of protesters, dozens of arrests, tempers flaring. Tensions are running high here outside this jail, where protesters have gathered and it's turned...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> “Anger in the streets and we’re there for the protests,” ABC anchor Diane Sawyer teased in making reaction from a few opposed to Arizona’s immigration enforcement efforts her top story on Thursday night. She led: “Emboldened by a judge&#8217;s rebuke of that law yesterday, hundreds of opponents of the crackdown took to the streets today. But the state&#8217;s unyielding Governor stood by the law.” ABC’s Barbara Pinto touted over video which included a protester waving a Che Guevara flag: Demonstrations started at dawn – hundreds of protesters, dozens of arrests, tempers flaring. Tensions are running high here outside this jail, where protesters have gathered and it&#8217;s turned&#8230;</p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2010/07/30/abc-leads-trumpeting-anger-streets-hundreds-phoenix" title="ABC Leads by Trumpeting ‘Anger in the Streets’ from ‘Hundreds’ in Phoenix">ABC Leads by Trumpeting ‘Anger in the Streets’ from ‘Hundreds’ in Phoenix</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/abc-leads-by-trumpeting-%e2%80%98anger-in-the-streets%e2%80%99-from-%e2%80%98hundreds%e2%80%99-in-phoenix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People who live in glass houses…</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/people-who-live-in-glass-houses%e2%80%a6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/people-who-live-in-glass-houses%e2%80%a6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/people-who-live-in-glass-houses%e2%80%a6/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ When you accuse someone of stupidity, it&#8217;s probably wise to avoid saying something stupid yourself while doing so. Sadly, E.J. Dionne fails to avoid that trap . Our discussion of the economic stimulus is another symptom of political irrationality. It&#8217;s entirely true that the $787 billion recovery package passed last year was not big enough to keep unemployment from rising to over 9 percent. But this is not actually an argument against the stimulus. On the contrary, studies showing that the stimulus created or saved up to 3 million jobs are...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When you accuse someone of stupidity, it&#8217;s probably wise to avoid saying something stupid yourself while doing so. Sadly, E.J. Dionne fails to avoid that trap . Our discussion of the economic stimulus is another symptom of political irrationality. It&#8217;s entirely true that the $787 billion recovery package passed last year was not big enough to keep unemployment from rising to over 9 percent. But this is not actually an argument against the stimulus. On the contrary, studies showing that the stimulus created or saved up to 3 million jobs are&#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.qando.net/?p=9098" title="People who live in glass houses…">People who live in glass houses…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/people-who-live-in-glass-houses%e2%80%a6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law Enforcement Officers Ordered Not To Enforce The Law</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/law-enforcement-officers-ordered-not-to-enforce-the-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/law-enforcement-officers-ordered-not-to-enforce-the-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/law-enforcement-officers-ordered-not-to-enforce-the-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our own Reliable Troll TM tried to stir the pot in the comments section of my previous post by noting that no one at WizBang had commented on US District... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our own Reliable Troll TM tried to stir the pot in the comments section of my previous post by noting that no one at WizBang had commented on US District&#8230; </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wizbangblog.com/~r/Wizbang/~3/33gRiuyosOs/law-enforcement-officers-ordered-not-to-enforce-the-law.php" title="Law Enforcement Officers Ordered Not To Enforce The Law">Law Enforcement Officers Ordered Not To Enforce The Law</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/law-enforcement-officers-ordered-not-to-enforce-the-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Democrats &#8216;Do as I say, not as I do&#8217; culture</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-democrats-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do-culture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-democrats-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do-culture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aaron gee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-democrats-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do-culture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rangel is only the latest example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rangel is only the latest example.</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/the_democrats_do_as_i_say_not.html" title="The Democrats 'Do as I say, not as I do' culture">The Democrats &#8216;Do as I say, not as I do&#8217; culture</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/30/the-democrats-do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do-culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bank on It</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/bank-on-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/bank-on-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/bank-on-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [Guest post by DRJ] Major Nidal Hasan has banking problems : &#8220;As he sits in the Bell County Jail, accused of the Nov. 5 Fort Hood shooting that left 13 dead, Maj. Nidal Hasan continues to receive his monthly U.S. Army paycheck, which based on his rank and experience is probably more than $6,000. That&#8217;s standard procedure for soldiers who are confined before military trial, according to Army officials. But Hasan, charged with a shooting spree that shocked the country, is not a standard defendant. And he&#8217;s having a hard time finding a bank to take his money. According to his civilian attorney John Galligan , Bank of America notified Hasan last month that it was closing ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [Guest post by DRJ] Major Nidal Hasan has banking problems : &#8220;As he sits in the Bell County Jail, accused of the Nov. 5 Fort Hood shooting that left 13 dead, Maj. Nidal Hasan continues to receive his monthly U.S. Army paycheck, which based on his rank and experience is probably more than $6,000. That&#8217;s standard procedure for soldiers who are confined before military trial, according to Army officials. But Hasan, charged with a shooting spree that shocked the country, is not a standard defendant. And he&#8217;s having a hard time finding a bank to take his money. According to his civilian attorney John Galligan , Bank of America notified Hasan last month that it was closing &#8230;</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://patterico.com/2010/07/29/bank-on-it/" title="Bank on It">Bank on It</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/bank-on-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNBC Reporter: Bush Tax Cuts Only Affected Those Making $250K or More</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/cnbc-reporter-bush-tax-cuts-only-affected-those-making-250k-or-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/cnbc-reporter-bush-tax-cuts-only-affected-those-making-250k-or-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/cnbc-reporter-bush-tax-cuts-only-affected-those-making-250k-or-more/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ CNBC.com's Jeff Cox needs to brush up on his financial history. He believes that George W. Bush's 2001 and 2003 tax cuts affected only the highest-earning taxpayers, i.e., those who gross $250,000 a year of more. He's wrong. Here's part of what Cox posted this morning (erroneous statement is bolded; HT to Mark Levin in his Thursday broadcast): Letting Bush Tax Cuts Die Would Kill Recovery: Analysts The nascent US economic recovery would be halted in 2011 if Congress fails to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, analysts at Deutsche Bank said. The cuts were enacted in 2001 and 2003 under President George W. Bush and covered those earning more than $250,000, but they are set to expire at the end of this year. Deutsche said the drag on gross domestic product should they lapse...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> CNBC.com&#8217;s Jeff Cox needs to brush up on his financial history. He believes that George W. Bush&#8217;s 2001 and 2003 tax cuts affected only the highest-earning taxpayers, i.e., those who gross $250,000 a year of more. He&#8217;s wrong. Here&#8217;s part of what Cox posted this morning (erroneous statement is bolded; HT to Mark Levin in his Thursday broadcast): Letting Bush Tax Cuts Die Would Kill Recovery: Analysts The nascent US economic recovery would be halted in 2011 if Congress fails to extend the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, analysts at Deutsche Bank said. The cuts were enacted in 2001 and 2003 under President George W. Bush and covered those earning more than $250,000, but they are set to expire at the end of this year. Deutsche said the drag on gross domestic product should they lapse&#8230;</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2010/07/30/cnbc-reporter-bush-tax-cuts-only-affected-those-making-250k-or-more" title="CNBC Reporter: Bush Tax Cuts Only Affected Those Making $250K or More">CNBC Reporter: Bush Tax Cuts Only Affected Those Making $250K or More</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/cnbc-reporter-bush-tax-cuts-only-affected-those-making-250k-or-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlie Rangel&#8217;s Very Bad Day!</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/charlie-rangels-very-bad-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/charlie-rangels-very-bad-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/charlie-rangels-very-bad-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Charlie's Very Very Bad Day! Charlie Rangel is an American Politician. He has been a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives since 1971, representing the 15th Congressional District of New York, and is the most senior member of that state&#8217;s congressional delegation. He is a founding member of the Congressional Black Congress. With his gravelly voice , cheery bonhomie and 40 years in the House, New York Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel is one of the best known and best liked members of Congress. But after the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Charlie&#8217;s Very Very Bad Day! Charlie Rangel is an American Politician. He has been a Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives since 1971, representing the 15th Congressional District of New York, and is the most senior member of that state&#8217;s congressional delegation. He is a founding member of the Congressional Black Congress. With his gravelly voice , cheery bonhomie and 40 years in the House, New York Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel is one of the best known and best liked members of Congress. But after the&#8230;</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/charlie-rangels-very-bad-day/" title="Charlie Rangel&#8217;s Very Bad Day!">Charlie Rangel&#8217;s Very Bad Day!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/charlie-rangels-very-bad-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Suit Seeks $30 Million in Madoff Family Money</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ny-suit-seeks-30-million-in-madoff-family-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ny-suit-seeks-30-million-in-madoff-family-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ny-suit-seeks-30-million-in-madoff-family-money/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Original post:
NY Suit Seeks $30 Million in Madoff Family Money
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/US/US-Madoff-Scandal/2010/07/29/id/366065" title="NY Suit Seeks $30 Million in Madoff Family Money">NY Suit Seeks $30 Million in Madoff Family Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ny-suit-seeks-30-million-in-madoff-family-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas in July, and maybe November too</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/christmas-in-july-and-maybe-november-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/christmas-in-july-and-maybe-november-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/christmas-in-july-and-maybe-november-too/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A newly released Fox News poll of registered voters shows the Republicans ahead in the generic ballot by 11%. Bill Otis, who brought this poll to my attention, says that if it accurately reflects how people will vote in November, "Republicans will take the Senate as well as the House; indeed, we will have our biggest House majority since 1946." JOHN adds: If you're in the mood for more good news, check out this analysis of Pew data indicating that voters are much closer to Republican than Democrat positions these ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A newly released Fox News poll of registered voters shows the Republicans ahead in the generic ballot by 11%. Bill Otis, who brought this poll to my attention, says that if it accurately reflects how people will vote in November, &#8220;Republicans will take the Senate as well as the House; indeed, we will have our biggest House majority since 1946.&#8221; JOHN adds: If you&#8217;re in the mood for more good news, check out this analysis of Pew data indicating that voters are much closer to Republican than Democrat positions these </p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/JyUq7jPtF6o/026879.php" title="Christmas in July, and maybe November too">Christmas in July, and maybe November too</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/christmas-in-july-and-maybe-november-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christmas in July, and maybe November too</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/christmas-in-july-and-maybe-november-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/christmas-in-july-and-maybe-november-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/christmas-in-july-and-maybe-november-too/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A newly released Fox News poll of registered voters shows the Republicans ahead in the generic ballot by 11%. Bill Otis, who brought this poll to my attention, says that if it accurately reflects how people will vote in November, "Republicans will take the Senate as well as the House; indeed, we will have our biggest House majority since 1946." JOHN adds: If you're in the mood for more good news, check out this analysis of Pew data indicating that voters are much closer to Republican than Democrat positions these days. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A newly released Fox News poll of registered voters shows the Republicans ahead in the generic ballot by 11%. Bill Otis, who brought this poll to my attention, says that if it accurately reflects how people will vote in November, &#8220;Republicans will take the Senate as well as the House; indeed, we will have our biggest House majority since 1946.&#8221; JOHN adds: If you&#8217;re in the mood for more good news, check out this analysis of Pew data indicating that voters are much closer to Republican than Democrat positions these days. </p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/JyUq7jPtF6o/026879.php" title="Christmas in July, and maybe November too">Christmas in July, and maybe November too</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/christmas-in-july-and-maybe-november-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-Defense as a Defense Against a Charge of Being a Felon in Possession of a Gun</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/self-defense-as-a-defense-against-a-charge-of-being-a-felon-in-possession-of-a%c2%a0gun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/self-defense-as-a-defense-against-a-charge-of-being-a-felon-in-possession-of-a%c2%a0gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/self-defense-as-a-defense-against-a-charge-of-being-a-felon-in-possession-of-a%c2%a0gun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Eugene Volokh) Friday, the Michigan Supreme Court handed down an interesting case — People v. Dupree on this. The case is not novel, and my sense is that the defense is generally recognized: Just as what would otherwise be the crime of murder, attempted murder, battery, and the like might be justified if done in defense against an imminent threat, so a felon’s taking possession of a gun is justified if done in defense against an imminent threat. (The defense does not apply to a felon’s arming himself against a possible threat of attack at some indefinite future time.) Still, the case struck me as an interesting illustration. Thanks to Jason ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Eugene Volokh) Friday, the Michigan Supreme Court handed down an interesting case — People v. Dupree on this. The case is not novel, and my sense is that the defense is generally recognized: Just as what would otherwise be the crime of murder, attempted murder, battery, and the like might be justified if done in defense against an imminent threat, so a felon’s taking possession of a gun is justified if done in defense against an imminent threat. (The defense does not apply to a felon’s arming himself against a possible threat of attack at some indefinite future time.) Still, the case struck me as an interesting illustration. Thanks to Jason </p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/volokh/mainfeed/~3/-BhfunWAGms/" title="Self-Defense as a Defense Against a Charge of Being a Felon in Possession of a Gun">Self-Defense as a Defense Against a Charge of Being a Felon in Possession of a Gun</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/self-defense-as-a-defense-against-a-charge-of-being-a-felon-in-possession-of-a%c2%a0gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-Defense as a Defense Against a Charge of Being a Felon in Possession of a Gun</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/self-defense-as-a-defense-against-a-charge-of-being-a-felon-in-possession-of-a%c2%a0gun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/self-defense-as-a-defense-against-a-charge-of-being-a-felon-in-possession-of-a%c2%a0gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/self-defense-as-a-defense-against-a-charge-of-being-a-felon-in-possession-of-a%c2%a0gun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Eugene Volokh) Friday, the Michigan Supreme Court handed down an interesting case — People v. Dupree on this. The case is not novel, and my sense is that the defense is generally recognized: Just as what would otherwise be the crime of murder, attempted murder, battery, and the like might be justified if done in defense against an imminent threat, so a felon’s taking possession of a gun is justified if done in defense against an imminent threat. (The defense does not apply to a felon’s arming himself against a possible threat of attack at some indefinite future time.) Still, the case struck me as an interesting illustration. Thanks to Jason C. Miller for the pointer. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Eugene Volokh) Friday, the Michigan Supreme Court handed down an interesting case — People v. Dupree on this. The case is not novel, and my sense is that the defense is generally recognized: Just as what would otherwise be the crime of murder, attempted murder, battery, and the like might be justified if done in defense against an imminent threat, so a felon’s taking possession of a gun is justified if done in defense against an imminent threat. (The defense does not apply to a felon’s arming himself against a possible threat of attack at some indefinite future time.) Still, the case struck me as an interesting illustration. Thanks to Jason C. Miller for the pointer. </p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/volokh/mainfeed/~3/-BhfunWAGms/" title="Self-Defense as a Defense Against a Charge of Being a Felon in Possession of a Gun">Self-Defense as a Defense Against a Charge of Being a Felon in Possession of a Gun</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/self-defense-as-a-defense-against-a-charge-of-being-a-felon-in-possession-of-a%c2%a0gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USC’s 2010 Media Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/usc%e2%80%99s-2010-media-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/usc%e2%80%99s-2010-media-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/usc%e2%80%99s-2010-media-guide/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [Guest post by DRJ] Are you ready for college football? I&#8217;m always ready and after a little housecleaning , USC may be ready, too: &#8220;[T]he Trojans&#8217; media guide has undergone some late-breaking revisionism to account for Reggie Bush&#8217;s vanishing Heisman Trophy, apparently overnight.&#8221; Before-and-after media guides are shown at the link. &#8211; DRJ ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [Guest post by DRJ] Are you ready for college football? I&#8217;m always ready and after a little housecleaning , USC may be ready, too: &#8220;[T]he Trojans&#8217; media guide has undergone some late-breaking revisionism to account for Reggie Bush&#8217;s vanishing Heisman Trophy, apparently overnight.&#8221; Before-and-after media guides are shown at the link. &#8211; DRJ </p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://patterico.com/2010/07/29/uscs-2010-media-guide/" title="USC’s 2010 Media Guide">USC’s 2010 Media Guide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/usc%e2%80%99s-2010-media-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USC’s 2010 Media Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/usc%e2%80%99s-2010-media-guide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/usc%e2%80%99s-2010-media-guide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/usc%e2%80%99s-2010-media-guide/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [Guest post by DRJ] Are you ready for college football? I&#8217;m always ready and after a little housecleaning , USC may be ready, too: &#8220;[T]he Trojans&#8217; media guide has undergone some late-breaking revisionism to account for Reggie Bush&#8217;s vanishing Heisman Trophy, apparently overnight.&#8221; Before-and-after media guides are shown at the link. &#8211; DRJ ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [Guest post by DRJ] Are you ready for college football? I&#8217;m always ready and after a little housecleaning , USC may be ready, too: &#8220;[T]he Trojans&#8217; media guide has undergone some late-breaking revisionism to account for Reggie Bush&#8217;s vanishing Heisman Trophy, apparently overnight.&#8221; Before-and-after media guides are shown at the link. &#8211; DRJ </p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://patterico.com/2010/07/29/uscs-2010-media-guide/" title="USC’s 2010 Media Guide">USC’s 2010 Media Guide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/usc%e2%80%99s-2010-media-guide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Draft Memo Leaked Discussing Ways to ByPass Congress on Amnesty</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ By The P/Oed Patriot According to an Article in National Review  ,an internal draft memo has been leaked from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) discussing ways to do an end run around Congress on Amnesty. The Article Reads: &#8220;the agency is considering ways in which it could enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action” — that is, without the consent of the American people through a vote in Congress. “This memorandum offers administrative relief options to . . . reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization,” it reads. Also: “In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to parole-in-place, deferred action and the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> By The P/Oed Patriot According to an Article in National Review  ,an internal draft memo has been leaked from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) discussing ways to do an end run around Congress on Amnesty. The Article Reads: &#8220;the agency is considering ways in which it could enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action” — that is, without the consent of the American people through a vote in Congress. “This memorandum offers administrative relief options to . . . reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization,” it reads. Also: “In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to parole-in-place, deferred action and the&#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/" title="USCIS Draft Memo Leaked Discussing Ways to ByPass Congress on Amnesty">USCIS Draft Memo Leaked Discussing Ways to ByPass Congress on Amnesty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Draft Memo Leaked Discussing Ways to ByPass Congress on Amnesty</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ By The P/Oed Patriot According to an Article in National Review  ,an internal draft memo has been leaked from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) discussing ways to do an end run around Congress on Amnesty. The Article Reads: &#8220;the agency is considering ways in which it could enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action” — that is, without the consent of the American people through a vote in Congress. “This memorandum offers administrative relief options to . . . reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization,” it reads. Also: “In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to parole-in-...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> By The P/Oed Patriot According to an Article in National Review  ,an internal draft memo has been leaked from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) discussing ways to do an end run around Congress on Amnesty. The Article Reads: &#8220;the agency is considering ways in which it could enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action” — that is, without the consent of the American people through a vote in Congress. “This memorandum offers administrative relief options to . . . reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization,” it reads. Also: “In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to parole-in-&#8230;</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/" title="USCIS Draft Memo Leaked Discussing Ways to ByPass Congress on Amnesty">USCIS Draft Memo Leaked Discussing Ways to ByPass Congress on Amnesty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/uscis-draft-memo-leaked-discussing-ways-to-bypass-congress-on-amnesty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Scott Bruun (R CAND, OR-05).</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Scott&#8217;s running a campaign that&#8217;s making the DCCC nervous - to the point where they&#8217;ve decided to throw money at his opponent as part of their DOOMList - and we spoke this morning about that and other matters. Scott&#8217;s site is here , and it&#8217;s a measure of the cycle that we&#8217;re legitimately talking about taking seats in Oregon. Roll on November&#8230; Moe Lane Crossposted to Moe Lane . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Scott&#8217;s running a campaign that&#8217;s making the DCCC nervous &#8211; to the point where they&#8217;ve decided to throw money at his opponent as part of their DOOMList &#8211; and we spoke this morning about that and other matters. Scott&#8217;s site is here , and it&#8217;s a measure of the cycle that we&#8217;re legitimately talking about taking seats in Oregon. Roll on November&#8230; Moe Lane Crossposted to Moe Lane . </p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/" title="Meet Scott Bruun (R CAND, OR-05).">Meet Scott Bruun (R CAND, OR-05).</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Scott Bruun (R CAND, OR-05).</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Scott&#8217;s running a campaign that&#8217;s making the DCCC nervous - to the point where they&#8217;ve decided to throw money at his opponent as part of their DOOMList - and we spoke this morning about that and other matters. Scott&#8217;s site is here , and it&#8217;s a measure of the cycle that we&#8217;re legitimately talking about taking seats in Oregon. Roll on November&#8230; Moe Lane Crossposted to Moe Lane . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Scott&#8217;s running a campaign that&#8217;s making the DCCC nervous &#8211; to the point where they&#8217;ve decided to throw money at his opponent as part of their DOOMList &#8211; and we spoke this morning about that and other matters. Scott&#8217;s site is here , and it&#8217;s a measure of the cycle that we&#8217;re legitimately talking about taking seats in Oregon. Roll on November&#8230; Moe Lane Crossposted to Moe Lane . </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/" title="Meet Scott Bruun (R CAND, OR-05).">Meet Scott Bruun (R CAND, OR-05).</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-scott-bruun-r-cand-or-05/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The evolution of Sister Toldjah blog design</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Tonight, I was digging around for an image stock photo I thought I had saved somewhere on my computer and in the process came across some screen caps/image graphics of all of my old blog designs. Boy, it sure brought back some good memories, memories I&#8217;d like to share with you &#8211; fond ones that go back to when I first started the blog and no one was reading it aka &#8220;The Early Daze.&#8221; Bear with me as I take a...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Tonight, I was digging around for an image stock photo I thought I had saved somewhere on my computer and in the process came across some screen caps/image graphics of all of my old blog designs. Boy, it sure brought back some good memories, memories I&#8217;d like to share with you &#8211; fond ones that go back to when I first started the blog and no one was reading it aka &#8220;The Early Daze.&#8221; Bear with me as I take a&#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/" title="The evolution of Sister Toldjah blog design">The evolution of Sister Toldjah blog design</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The evolution of Sister Toldjah blog design</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Tonight, I was digging around for an image stock photo I thought I had saved somewhere on my computer and in the process came across some screen caps/image graphics of all of my old blog designs. Boy, it sure brought back some good memories, memories I&#8217;d like to share with you &#8211; fond ones that go back to when I first started the blog and no one was reading it aka &#8220;The Early Daze.&#8221; Bear with me as I take a long-winded trip down memory lane. A little to-not-known-at-all-factoid about yours truly is that LONG ago, well-before I became a political junkie, I dabbled a bit in web design, but it was all HTML-based and ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Tonight, I was digging around for an image stock photo I thought I had saved somewhere on my computer and in the process came across some screen caps/image graphics of all of my old blog designs. Boy, it sure brought back some good memories, memories I&#8217;d like to share with you &#8211; fond ones that go back to when I first started the blog and no one was reading it aka &#8220;The Early Daze.&#8221; Bear with me as I take a long-winded trip down memory lane. A little to-not-known-at-all-factoid about yours truly is that LONG ago, well-before I became a political junkie, I dabbled a bit in web design, but it was all HTML-based and &#8230;</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/" title="The evolution of Sister Toldjah blog design">The evolution of Sister Toldjah blog design</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-evolution-of-sister-toldjah-blog-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Mr. Pawlenty</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-mr-pawlenty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-mr-pawlenty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-mr-pawlenty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Regular readers know that I am a big fan of Minnesota's Governor, Tim Pawlenty. He has compiled an enviable record of fiscal conservatism in the face of a hostile Democratic majority in both houses of Minnesota's legislature. While he has not announced as a 2012 Presidential candidate, I don't think there is any doubt that he intends to throw his hat into the ring. In this video, he introduces his Freedom First PAC and, not incidentally, himself to the American voter. If you haven't seen much of Pawlenty, it's an excellent introduction: ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Regular readers know that I am a big fan of Minnesota&#8217;s Governor, Tim Pawlenty. He has compiled an enviable record of fiscal conservatism in the face of a hostile Democratic majority in both houses of Minnesota&#8217;s legislature. While he has not announced as a 2012 Presidential candidate, I don&#8217;t think there is any doubt that he intends to throw his hat into the ring. In this video, he introduces his Freedom First PAC and, not incidentally, himself to the American voter. If you haven&#8217;t seen much of Pawlenty, it&#8217;s an excellent introduction: </p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/tPblJRHmVJE/026878.php" title="Meet Mr. Pawlenty">Meet Mr. Pawlenty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-mr-pawlenty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet Mr. Pawlenty</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-mr-pawlenty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-mr-pawlenty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-mr-pawlenty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Regular readers know that I am a big fan of Minnesota's Governor, Tim Pawlenty. He has compiled an enviable record of fiscal conservatism in the face of a hostile Democratic majority in both houses of Minnesota's legislature. While he has not announced as a 2012 Presidential candidate, I don't think there is any doubt that he intends to throw his hat into the ring. In this video, he introduces his Freedom First PAC and, not incidentally, himself to the American voter. If you haven't seen much of Pawlenty, it's an excellent introduction: ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Regular readers know that I am a big fan of Minnesota&#8217;s Governor, Tim Pawlenty. He has compiled an enviable record of fiscal conservatism in the face of a hostile Democratic majority in both houses of Minnesota&#8217;s legislature. While he has not announced as a 2012 Presidential candidate, I don&#8217;t think there is any doubt that he intends to throw his hat into the ring. In this video, he introduces his Freedom First PAC and, not incidentally, himself to the American voter. If you haven&#8217;t seen much of Pawlenty, it&#8217;s an excellent introduction: </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/tPblJRHmVJE/026878.php" title="Meet Mr. Pawlenty">Meet Mr. Pawlenty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/meet-mr-pawlenty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big News for Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/big-news-for-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/big-news-for-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/big-news-for-tomorrow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ SEC charges the Wyly Brothers, longtime major GOP fundraisers, with insider trading. Insider trading - Business - Sterling Software - Allegedly Unethical Firms - One Complainant ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> SEC charges the Wyly Brothers, longtime major GOP fundraisers, with insider trading. Insider trading &#8211; Business &#8211; Sterling Software &#8211; Allegedly Unethical Firms &#8211; One Complainant </p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/h6NQ8YShjC4/big_news_for_tomorrow.php" title="Big News for Tomorrow">Big News for Tomorrow</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/big-news-for-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big News for Tomorrow</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/big-news-for-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/big-news-for-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/big-news-for-tomorrow/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ SEC charges the Wyly Brothers, longtime major GOP fundraisers, with insider trading. Insider trading - Business - Sterling Software - Allegedly Unethical Firms - One Complainant ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> SEC charges the Wyly Brothers, longtime major GOP fundraisers, with insider trading. Insider trading &#8211; Business &#8211; Sterling Software &#8211; Allegedly Unethical Firms &#8211; One Complainant </p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/h6NQ8YShjC4/big_news_for_tomorrow.php" title="Big News for Tomorrow">Big News for Tomorrow</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/big-news-for-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Step to Kill Gulf Gusher May Happen Sooner</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/key-step-to-kill-gulf-gusher-may-happen-sooner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/key-step-to-kill-gulf-gusher-may-happen-sooner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/key-step-to-kill-gulf-gusher-may-happen-sooner/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The rest is here:
Key Step to Kill Gulf Gusher May Happen Sooner
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/US/US-Gulf-Oil-Spill/2010/07/29/id/366063" title="Key Step to Kill Gulf Gusher May Happen Sooner">Key Step to Kill Gulf Gusher May Happen Sooner</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/key-step-to-kill-gulf-gusher-may-happen-sooner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chelsea Clinton&#8217;s Wedding Declared a No-Fly Zone</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/chelsea-clintons-wedding-declared-a-no-fly-zone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/chelsea-clintons-wedding-declared-a-no-fly-zone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/chelsea-clintons-wedding-declared-a-no-fly-zone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
See the rest here:
Chelsea Clinton&#8217;s Wedding Declared a No-Fly Zone
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Chelsea-s-Wedding-Security/2010/07/29/id/366061" title="Chelsea Clinton's Wedding Declared a No-Fly Zone">Chelsea Clinton&#8217;s Wedding Declared a No-Fly Zone</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/chelsea-clintons-wedding-declared-a-no-fly-zone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lionel Toy Train Convention</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [Guest post by DRJ] Wouldn&#8217;t it be fun to go to the Lionel Toy Train Convention in Denver? &#8220;More than 1,000 model-train buffs such as Cook have taken over the Denver Marriott Tech Center hotel this week for the Lionel Collectors Club of America&#8217;s 40th annual convention. They&#8217;re riding Colorado&#8217;s rails every day and talking trains every night. A three-tier, 37-train layout, featuring the 110-year-old Lionel company&#8217;s latest engines, will soon churn through the hotel&#8217;s atrium. Kids — mostly boys but a few girls — are everywhere, building their own tracks and ogling the intricate designs. Dads and grandpas gather around the tracks. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [Guest post by DRJ] Wouldn&#8217;t it be fun to go to the Lionel Toy Train Convention in Denver? &#8220;More than 1,000 model-train buffs such as Cook have taken over the Denver Marriott Tech Center hotel this week for the Lionel Collectors Club of America&#8217;s 40th annual convention. They&#8217;re riding Colorado&#8217;s rails every day and talking trains every night. A three-tier, 37-train layout, featuring the 110-year-old Lionel company&#8217;s latest engines, will soon churn through the hotel&#8217;s atrium. Kids — mostly boys but a few girls — are everywhere, building their own tracks and ogling the intricate designs. Dads and grandpas gather around the tracks. &#8230;</p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://patterico.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/" title="Lionel Toy Train Convention">Lionel Toy Train Convention</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lionel Toy Train Convention</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [Guest post by DRJ] Wouldn&#8217;t it be fun to go to the Lionel Toy Train Convention in Denver? &#8220;More than 1,000 model-train buffs such as Cook have taken over the Denver Marriott Tech Center hotel this week for the Lionel Collectors Club of America&#8217;s 40th annual convention. They&#8217;re riding Colorado&#8217;s rails every day and talking trains every night. A three-tier, 37-train layout, featuring the 110-year-old Lionel company&#8217;s latest engines, will soon churn through the hotel&#8217;s atrium. Kids — mostly boys but a few girls — are everywhere, building their own tracks and ogling the intricate designs. Dads and grandpas gather around the tracks. &#...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [Guest post by DRJ] Wouldn&#8217;t it be fun to go to the Lionel Toy Train Convention in Denver? &#8220;More than 1,000 model-train buffs such as Cook have taken over the Denver Marriott Tech Center hotel this week for the Lionel Collectors Club of America&#8217;s 40th annual convention. They&#8217;re riding Colorado&#8217;s rails every day and talking trains every night. A three-tier, 37-train layout, featuring the 110-year-old Lionel company&#8217;s latest engines, will soon churn through the hotel&#8217;s atrium. Kids — mostly boys but a few girls — are everywhere, building their own tracks and ogling the intricate designs. Dads and grandpas gather around the tracks. &#&#8230;</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://patterico.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/" title="Lionel Toy Train Convention">Lionel Toy Train Convention</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lionel-toy-train-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intelligence Nominee Clears First Senate Hurdle</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/intelligence-nominee-clears-first-senate-hurdle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/intelligence-nominee-clears-first-senate-hurdle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/intelligence-nominee-clears-first-senate-hurdle/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Read this article:
Intelligence Nominee Clears First Senate Hurdle
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Intelligence-Chief-Senate/2010/07/29/id/366059" title="Intelligence Nominee Clears First Senate Hurdle">Intelligence Nominee Clears First Senate Hurdle</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/intelligence-nominee-clears-first-senate-hurdle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jill Biden Plays to Type in &#8216;Army Wives&#8217; Episode</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/jill-biden-plays-to-type-in-army-wives-episode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/jill-biden-plays-to-type-in-army-wives-episode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/jill-biden-plays-to-type-in-army-wives-episode/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Read this article:
Jill Biden Plays to Type in &#8216;Army Wives&#8217; Episode
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Jill-Biden-Army-Wives/2010/07/29/id/366057" title="Jill Biden Plays to Type in 'Army Wives' Episode">Jill Biden Plays to Type in &#8216;Army Wives&#8217; Episode</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/jill-biden-plays-to-type-in-army-wives-episode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed Judge Gets Threats After AZ Immigration Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/fed-judge-gets-threats-after-az-immigration-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/fed-judge-gets-threats-after-az-immigration-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/fed-judge-gets-threats-after-az-immigration-ruling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
See the original post:
Fed Judge Gets Threats After AZ Immigration Ruling
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/US/US-Arizona-Immigration/2010/07/29/id/366052" title="Fed Judge Gets Threats After AZ Immigration Ruling">Fed Judge Gets Threats After AZ Immigration Ruling</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/fed-judge-gets-threats-after-az-immigration-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dems, GOP Warily Eye Arizona Immigration Ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dems-gop-warily-eye-arizona-immigration-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dems-gop-warily-eye-arizona-immigration-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dems-gop-warily-eye-arizona-immigration-ruling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Read the original:
Dems, GOP Warily Eye Arizona Immigration Ruling
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Arizona-Immigration-Fallout/2010/07/29/id/366051" title="Dems, GOP Warily Eye Arizona Immigration Ruling">Dems, GOP Warily Eye Arizona Immigration Ruling</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dems-gop-warily-eye-arizona-immigration-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catch this?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/catch-this/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/catch-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/catch-this/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The dogs surely did:H/T to the invaluable Gerard Vanderleun.... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The dogs surely did:H/T to the invaluable Gerard Vanderleun&#8230;. </p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wizbangblog.com/~r/Wizbang/~3/GJIYzH5amEs/catch-this.php" title="Catch this?">Catch this?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/catch-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Persistent Persecution</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/persistent-persecution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/persistent-persecution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/persistent-persecution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This is a sickening news story : "Spanish Court Seeks Arrest of U.S. Soldiers in Hotel Attack." The National Court of Spain has issued an "international arrest warrant" for American soldiers who were involved in the Palestine Hotel incident in Baghdad in 2003: On the morning of July 29, Spain's National Court announced that it has re-issued an international arrest warrant against three U.S. soldiers it implicates in an attack on Baghdad's Hotel Palestine, where Rodriguez and Couso, along with dozens of other journalists, were based during the Iraq war. On April 8, 2003, one day before U.S. troops officially captured ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> This is a sickening news story : &#8220;Spanish Court Seeks Arrest of U.S. Soldiers in Hotel Attack.&#8221; The National Court of Spain has issued an &#8220;international arrest warrant&#8221; for American soldiers who were involved in the Palestine Hotel incident in Baghdad in 2003: On the morning of July 29, Spain&#8217;s National Court announced that it has re-issued an international arrest warrant against three U.S. soldiers it implicates in an attack on Baghdad&#8217;s Hotel Palestine, where Rodriguez and Couso, along with dozens of other journalists, were based during the Iraq war. On April 8, 2003, one day before U.S. troops officially captured &#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/u-hpgV2agoY/026877.php" title="Persistent Persecution">Persistent Persecution</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/persistent-persecution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First in the Nation Referendum on Obamacare: Yes on Prop C</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ By RebootCongress . Missouri is the next battleground in the fight against Obamacare. Next Tuesday, August 3rd, Show Me State voters will head to the polls for the primary election. In addition to choosing candidates to represent each party in the November general election, each party ticket will also have Prop C on the ballot. Conservatives, led by Missourians for Health Care Freedom , are encouraging a &#8220;Yes&#8221; on Prop C. Primary elections often have low turnout. We want to send a loud and clear message to the ruling class in DC, so we could use your ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> By RebootCongress . Missouri is the next battleground in the fight against Obamacare. Next Tuesday, August 3rd, Show Me State voters will head to the polls for the primary election. In addition to choosing candidates to represent each party in the November general election, each party ticket will also have Prop C on the ballot. Conservatives, led by Missourians for Health Care Freedom , are encouraging a &#8220;Yes&#8221; on Prop C. Primary elections often have low turnout. We want to send a loud and clear message to the ruling class in DC, so we could use your &#8230;</p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/" title="First in the Nation Referendum on Obamacare: Yes on Prop C">First in the Nation Referendum on Obamacare: Yes on Prop C</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First in the Nation Referendum on Obamacare: Yes on Prop C</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ By RebootCongress . Missouri is the next battleground in the fight against Obamacare. Next Tuesday, August 3rd, Show Me State voters will head to the polls for the primary election. In addition to choosing candidates to represent each party in the November general election, each party ticket will also have Prop C on the ballot. Conservatives, led by Missourians for Health Care Freedom , are encouraging a &#8220;Yes&#8221; on Prop C. Primary elections often have low turnout. We want to send a loud and clear message to the ruling class in DC, so we could use your help...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> By RebootCongress . Missouri is the next battleground in the fight against Obamacare. Next Tuesday, August 3rd, Show Me State voters will head to the polls for the primary election. In addition to choosing candidates to represent each party in the November general election, each party ticket will also have Prop C on the ballot. Conservatives, led by Missourians for Health Care Freedom , are encouraging a &#8220;Yes&#8221; on Prop C. Primary elections often have low turnout. We want to send a loud and clear message to the ruling class in DC, so we could use your help&#8230;</p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/" title="First in the Nation Referendum on Obamacare: Yes on Prop C">First in the Nation Referendum on Obamacare: Yes on Prop C</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/first-in-the-nation-referendum-on-obamacare-yes-on-prop-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sherrod vs. Breitbart?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/sherrod-vs-breitbart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/sherrod-vs-breitbart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/sherrod-vs-breitbart/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Shirley Sherrod claims that she "definitely" will sue Andrew Breitbart for posting the famous video clip of her addressing an NAACP group on his Big Government site. "He had to know that he was targeting me," she says. It isn't clear what Ms. Sherrod intends to sue Breitbart for; some variety of defamation, presumably. It seems inconceivable that she could survive summary judgment under the actual malice standard that would apply. Offhand, I would think that she would be better served to sue Tom Vilsack. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Shirley Sherrod claims that she &#8220;definitely&#8221; will sue Andrew Breitbart for posting the famous video clip of her addressing an NAACP group on his Big Government site. &#8220;He had to know that he was targeting me,&#8221; she says. It isn&#8217;t clear what Ms. Sherrod intends to sue Breitbart for; some variety of defamation, presumably. It seems inconceivable that she could survive summary judgment under the actual malice standard that would apply. Offhand, I would think that she would be better served to sue Tom Vilsack. </p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/XxG6xzmOsS8/026876.php" title="Sherrod vs. Breitbart?">Sherrod vs. Breitbart?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/sherrod-vs-breitbart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law and Disorder</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/law-and-disorder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/law-and-disorder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/law-and-disorder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ So much for the illusion of state's rights. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> So much for the illusion of state&#8217;s rights. </p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/glenn-foden/2010/07/29/law-and-disorder" title="Law and Disorder">Law and Disorder</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/law-and-disorder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Grimm Jewish Money Q2&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/grimm-jewish-money-q2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/grimm-jewish-money-q2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/grimm-jewish-money-q2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This should go over well. A campaign aide to first term Dem Mike McMahon (D-NY) of Staten Island wanted to show that a lot of Republican challenger Mike Grimm's money came from outside the district. Putting together a list of the "Jewish Money" Grimm raised in Q2 probably wasn't the best approach. And if that wasn't enough, she sent the list to the New York Observer . How could anything bad come of that? McMahon has relieved the aide, Jennifer Nelson, of her duties. Staten Island - Michael McMahon - Republican - Mike McMahon - Mike Grimm ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> This should go over well. A campaign aide to first term Dem Mike McMahon (D-NY) of Staten Island wanted to show that a lot of Republican challenger Mike Grimm&#8217;s money came from outside the district. Putting together a list of the &#8220;Jewish Money&#8221; Grimm raised in Q2 probably wasn&#8217;t the best approach. And if that wasn&#8217;t enough, she sent the list to the New York Observer . How could anything bad come of that? McMahon has relieved the aide, Jennifer Nelson, of her duties. Staten Island &#8211; Michael McMahon &#8211; Republican &#8211; Mike McMahon &#8211; Mike Grimm </p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/Py7e-OrMvTI/grimm_jewish_money_q2.php" title="&quot;Grimm Jewish Money Q2&quot;">&quot;Grimm Jewish Money Q2&quot;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/grimm-jewish-money-q2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dale’s Observations For 2010-07-29</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dale%e2%80%99s-observations-for-2010-07-29/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dale%e2%80%99s-observations-for-2010-07-29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dale%e2%80%99s-observations-for-2010-07-29/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ World’s fairs are designed for people from homogeneous cultures who are still impressed by electricity and foreigners. http://bit.ly/axU49H # FINALLY! Harley-Davidson provides an OEM stereo kit for their customers who don't ride huge touring bikes. http://bit.ly/9L2qoe # Amazon unveils 3rd-generation Kindle e-book reader, now with wi-fi! http://usat.me?39468850 # Mortgage Rates Fall Again; 30-Year Fixed At 4.54%. http://bit.ly/9fYWmO # RecoverySummer # Jobless claims for the week at 457k, down 11k. Underlying rate is essentially unchanged. http://bit.ly/dhymwM # RecoverySummer # ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> World’s fairs are designed for people from homogeneous cultures who are still impressed by electricity and foreigners. http://bit.ly/axU49H # FINALLY! Harley-Davidson provides an OEM stereo kit for their customers who don&#8217;t ride huge touring bikes. http://bit.ly/9L2qoe # Amazon unveils 3rd-generation Kindle e-book reader, now with wi-fi! http://usat.me?39468850 # Mortgage Rates Fall Again; 30-Year Fixed At 4.54%. http://bit.ly/9fYWmO # RecoverySummer # Jobless claims for the week at 457k, down 11k. Underlying rate is essentially unchanged. http://bit.ly/dhymwM # RecoverySummer # </p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.qando.net/?p=9094" title="Dale’s Observations For 2010-07-29">Dale’s Observations For 2010-07-29</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dale%e2%80%99s-observations-for-2010-07-29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After a Year in Office, Biden Says Afghan War Policy Still Developing</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/after-a-year-in-office-biden-says-afghan-war-policy-still-developing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/after-a-year-in-office-biden-says-afghan-war-policy-still-developing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/after-a-year-in-office-biden-says-afghan-war-policy-still-developing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ -By Warner Todd Huston Vice President Joe Biden wants everyone to just calm down. He says that it&#8217;s &#8220; much too premature &#8221; to judge the Obama administration&#8217;s efforts in Afghanistan. Apparently, after a year of focusing on &#8220;the right war,&#8221; America is still waiting for the Obama administration to &#8220;develop&#8221; its policies there. But one thing seems sure, the Obama administration has already excluded the possibility that more troops will be sent if Biden&#8217;s comments can be believed. When asked if the additional 30,000 troops are successful, will the administration send even more after them, Biden did not hesitate to say, &#8220;...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> -By Warner Todd Huston Vice President Joe Biden wants everyone to just calm down. He says that it&#8217;s &#8220; much too premature &#8221; to judge the Obama administration&#8217;s efforts in Afghanistan. Apparently, after a year of focusing on &#8220;the right war,&#8221; America is still waiting for the Obama administration to &#8220;develop&#8221; its policies there. But one thing seems sure, the Obama administration has already excluded the possibility that more troops will be sent if Biden&#8217;s comments can be believed. When asked if the additional 30,000 troops are successful, will the administration send even more after them, Biden did not hesitate to say, &#8220;&#8230;</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/after-a-year-in-office-biden-says-afghan-war-policy-still-developing/" title="After a Year in Office, Biden Says Afghan War Policy Still Developing">After a Year in Office, Biden Says Afghan War Policy Still Developing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/after-a-year-in-office-biden-says-afghan-war-policy-still-developing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do as I say, not as I do</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aaron gee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The House Ethics Panel convened today to air the 13 ethics violations of which twenty term Congressman Charlie Rangel (D) NY is accused. The Congressman failed to show up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The House Ethics Panel convened today to air the 13 ethics violations of which twenty term Congressman Charlie Rangel (D) NY is accused. The Congressman failed to show up.</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/do_as_i_say_not_as_i_do.html" title="Do as I say, not as I do">Do as I say, not as I do</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/do-as-i-say-not-as-i-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A mongrel people?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-mongrel-people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-mongrel-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-mongrel-people/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Did Barack Obama actually call Blacks &#8220;a mongrel people?&#8221; Why, yes. Yes he did . I grew up in southeast Georgia, where Blacks comprised nearly 40% of the population during the 1960s and 1970s. It&#8217;s down to around 30% statewide today . So, unlike most Whites in the home states of Barack Obama and Daniel Inouye (1.6%), Nancy Pelosi (6.1%), Harry Reid (6.4%), or Howard Dean (0.6%), I actually grew up going to school with, playing with, going to church with &#8230; Blacks. I&#8217;ve never considered Blacks a mongrel people. Still don&#8217;t, despite what the president says. And I haven&#8217;t changed my opinion of Barack ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Did Barack Obama actually call Blacks &#8220;a mongrel people?&#8221; Why, yes. Yes he did . I grew up in southeast Georgia, where Blacks comprised nearly 40% of the population during the 1960s and 1970s. It&#8217;s down to around 30% statewide today . So, unlike most Whites in the home states of Barack Obama and Daniel Inouye (1.6%), Nancy Pelosi (6.1%), Harry Reid (6.4%), or Howard Dean (0.6%), I actually grew up going to school with, playing with, going to church with &#8230; Blacks. I&#8217;ve never considered Blacks a mongrel people. Still don&#8217;t, despite what the president says. And I haven&#8217;t changed my opinion of Barack </p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.imao.us/index.php/2010/07/a-mongrel-people/" title="A mongrel people?">A mongrel people?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-mongrel-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats Strategy Against the Republicans / Tea Party : Claim they are One in the Same</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/democrats-strategy-against-the-republicans-tea-party-claim-they-are-one-in-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/democrats-strategy-against-the-republicans-tea-party-claim-they-are-one-in-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/democrats-strategy-against-the-republicans-tea-party-claim-they-are-one-in-the-same/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ By The P/Oed Patriot After months of attacks against the Tea Party by Democrats calling them everything from extremists to racists with no explanation, the reason is now clear. Part of the Democrats strategy for trying to keep control of Congress is to link the Republican Party to the Tea Partiers. They are releasing what they say is the identical agenda of both the Tea Party and the Republicans and titled it, &#8220;Contract on America&#8221;. The Democrats are saying that the Republicans and Tea Party will repeal all that the Dems have &#8220;Accomplished&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not sure about the Republicans, but speaking for myself...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> By The P/Oed Patriot After months of attacks against the Tea Party by Democrats calling them everything from extremists to racists with no explanation, the reason is now clear. Part of the Democrats strategy for trying to keep control of Congress is to link the Republican Party to the Tea Partiers. They are releasing what they say is the identical agenda of both the Tea Party and the Republicans and titled it, &#8220;Contract on America&#8221;. The Democrats are saying that the Republicans and Tea Party will repeal all that the Dems have &#8220;Accomplished&#8221;.  I&#8217;m not sure about the Republicans, but speaking for myself&#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/democrats-strategy-against-the-republicans-tea-party-claim-they-are-one-in-the-same/" title="Democrats Strategy Against the Republicans / Tea Party : Claim they are One in the Same">Democrats Strategy Against the Republicans / Tea Party : Claim they are One in the Same</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/democrats-strategy-against-the-republicans-tea-party-claim-they-are-one-in-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pogonophobia &#8212; By: Jonah Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/pogonophobia-by-jonah-goldberg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/pogonophobia-by-jonah-goldberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/pogonophobia-by-jonah-goldberg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Dan - You relative newbies need to consult the wisdom of the ancients your slightly older colleagues. You cannot discuss the role of facial hair in politics without referencing the grand tradition of pogonophobia posts in the Corner. For example, brother Steyn 2005: I like John Bolton's moustache, which seems to me rather Balkan, and thus potentially discombobulating for European foreign ministers. On the broader subject of the rampant pogonophobia in Western politics, as one of the more hirsute National Review contributors, I note that the Brookhiser thesis on transatlantic facial hair fashions never extended to Canadian public life. Even in the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Dan &#8211; You relative newbies need to consult the wisdom of the ancients your slightly older colleagues. You cannot discuss the role of facial hair in politics without referencing the grand tradition of pogonophobia posts in the Corner. For example, brother Steyn 2005: I like John Bolton&#8217;s moustache, which seems to me rather Balkan, and thus potentially discombobulating for European foreign ministers. On the broader subject of the rampant pogonophobia in Western politics, as one of the more hirsute National Review contributors, I note that the Brookhiser thesis on transatlantic facial hair fashions never extended to Canadian public life. Even in the &#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODE3OTBjZTA3YjhjZTY2NTViZmFiNDYwMjExZTlhMWE=" title="Pogonophobia -- By: Jonah Goldberg">Pogonophobia &#8212; By: Jonah Goldberg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/pogonophobia-by-jonah-goldberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Matthews Rips Howard Dean Over Content of Breitbart&#8217;s Sherrod Videos</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/chris-matthews-rips-howard-dean-over-content-of-breitbarts-sherrod-videos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/chris-matthews-rips-howard-dean-over-content-of-breitbarts-sherrod-videos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/chris-matthews-rips-howard-dean-over-content-of-breitbarts-sherrod-videos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Chris Matthews and Howard Dean on Thursday got into a heated argument about what was included in the controversial video excerpts Andrew Breitbart published at his website last Monday involving former USDA official Shirley Sherrod. In the opening segment of the 5PM installment of MSNBC's "Hardball," Matthews was discussing with the former Vermont Governor as well as Salon Editor-in-Chief Joan Walsh the announcement that Sherrod intends to sue Breitbart. After playing both videos posted at BigGovernment.com back on July 19, Matthews noted, "That part...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Chris Matthews and Howard Dean on Thursday got into a heated argument about what was included in the controversial video excerpts Andrew Breitbart published at his website last Monday involving former USDA official Shirley Sherrod. In the opening segment of the 5PM installment of MSNBC&#8217;s &#8220;Hardball,&#8221; Matthews was discussing with the former Vermont Governor as well as Salon Editor-in-Chief Joan Walsh the announcement that Sherrod intends to sue Breitbart. After playing both videos posted at BigGovernment.com back on July 19, Matthews noted, &#8220;That part&#8230;</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/07/29/chris-matthews-and-howard-dean-get-heated-argument-about-sherrod-videos" title="Chris Matthews Rips Howard Dean Over Content of Breitbart's Sherrod Videos">Chris Matthews Rips Howard Dean Over Content of Breitbart&#8217;s Sherrod Videos</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/chris-matthews-rips-howard-dean-over-content-of-breitbarts-sherrod-videos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Firm: A word from Gary Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-firm-a-word-from-gary-bruce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-firm-a-word-from-gary-bruce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-firm-a-word-from-gary-bruce/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Professor Gary Bruce is Chairman of the Department of History at the University of Waterloo in Waterloo, Ontario. He is also the author of The Firm: The Inside Story of the Stasi , published earlier this month by Oxford University Press. Based on previously classified documents and on interviews with former secret police officers and ordinary citizens, The Firm is the first comprehensive history of East Germany's secret police at the grassroots level. The Stasi made what might have been its most memorable appearance in popular culture a few years ago in the riveting Academy Award-winning film The Lives of Others . Urged by a friend to see the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Professor Gary Bruce is Chairman of the Department of History at the University of Waterloo in Waterloo, Ontario. He is also the author of The Firm: The Inside Story of the Stasi , published earlier this month by Oxford University Press. Based on previously classified documents and on interviews with former secret police officers and ordinary citizens, The Firm is the first comprehensive history of East Germany&#8217;s secret police at the grassroots level. The Stasi made what might have been its most memorable appearance in popular culture a few years ago in the riveting Academy Award-winning film The Lives of Others . Urged by a friend to see the &#8230;</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/ARkSB64tWH4/026874.php" title="The Firm: A word from Gary Bruce">The Firm: A word from Gary Bruce</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-firm-a-word-from-gary-bruce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY Times Focuses on Obama&#8217;s Populist Sub Shop Stop in NJ, Skips Glitzy Manhattan Fundraising Tour</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ny-times-focuses-on-obamas-populist-sub-shop-stop-in-nj-skips-glitzy-manhattan-fundraising-tour/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ny-times-focuses-on-obamas-populist-sub-shop-stop-in-nj-skips-glitzy-manhattan-fundraising-tour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ny-times-focuses-on-obamas-populist-sub-shop-stop-in-nj-skips-glitzy-manhattan-fundraising-tour/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ New York Times reporters David Herszenhorn and Jackie Calmes reported on Obama's politically calculated visit to the Tastee Sub Shop in Edison, N.J. in Thursday's " Obama Trumpets Party's Small-Business Bona Fides ." The paper's political team let Obama fully sell himself as a down-home populist by completely skipping (in the print edition) the fact that Obama would be departing from a town in New Jersey to two glitzy fundraisers in the Times's home town Manhattan. The Washington Post, on the other hand, did notice that Obama later traveled by helicopter to a fundraiser at the Four Seasons in Manhattan, then went on to Vogue editor Anna Wintour's townhouse for another. Calmes filed a report on the fundraisers Wednesday night for the paper's...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> New York Times reporters David Herszenhorn and Jackie Calmes reported on Obama&#8217;s politically calculated visit to the Tastee Sub Shop in Edison, N.J. in Thursday&#8217;s &#8221; Obama Trumpets Party&#8217;s Small-Business Bona Fides .&#8221; The paper&#8217;s political team let Obama fully sell himself as a down-home populist by completely skipping (in the print edition) the fact that Obama would be departing from a town in New Jersey to two glitzy fundraisers in the Times&#8217;s home town Manhattan. The Washington Post, on the other hand, did notice that Obama later traveled by helicopter to a fundraiser at the Four Seasons in Manhattan, then went on to Vogue editor Anna Wintour&#8217;s townhouse for another. Calmes filed a report on the fundraisers Wednesday night for the paper&#8217;s&#8230;</p>
<p>Read more from the original source:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/clay-waters/2010/07/29/ny-times-focuses-obamas-populist-sub-shop-stop-nj-skips-glitzy-manhatta" title="NY Times Focuses on Obama's Populist Sub Shop Stop in NJ, Skips Glitzy Manhattan Fundraising Tour">NY Times Focuses on Obama&#8217;s Populist Sub Shop Stop in NJ, Skips Glitzy Manhattan Fundraising Tour</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ny-times-focuses-on-obamas-populist-sub-shop-stop-in-nj-skips-glitzy-manhattan-fundraising-tour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House&#8217;s Gibbs Blasts Rush Limbaugh to Defend Federal Automaker Takeover</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/white-houses-gibbs-blasts-rush-limbaugh-to-defend-federal-automaker-takeover/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/white-houses-gibbs-blasts-rush-limbaugh-to-defend-federal-automaker-takeover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/white-houses-gibbs-blasts-rush-limbaugh-to-defend-federal-automaker-takeover/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ What is it with this White House and publicly calling out conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh? If you recall, back in January 2009 President Barack Obama told Republican congressional leaders to quit listening to Limbaugh if they wanted to get things done. It's happened once again. During the White House daily press briefing on July 29, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs took another couple of jabs Limbaugh - this time over the auto manufacturer bailout. In responding to a question concerning charges of "socialism," Gibbs went right after Limbaugh. "Look, I'll say this - Rush Limbaugh and others wanted to walk away," Gibbs said. "Rush Limbaugh and others saw a million people that work at these factories that worked at these part suppliers that supported communities and thought that we should all just walk away. The president didn't think that...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> What is it with this White House and publicly calling out conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh? If you recall, back in January 2009 President Barack Obama told Republican congressional leaders to quit listening to Limbaugh if they wanted to get things done. It&#8217;s happened once again. During the White House daily press briefing on July 29, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs took another couple of jabs Limbaugh &#8211; this time over the auto manufacturer bailout. In responding to a question concerning charges of &#8220;socialism,&#8221; Gibbs went right after Limbaugh. &#8220;Look, I&#8217;ll say this &#8211; Rush Limbaugh and others wanted to walk away,&#8221; Gibbs said. &#8220;Rush Limbaugh and others saw a million people that work at these factories that worked at these part suppliers that supported communities and thought that we should all just walk away. The president didn&#8217;t think that&#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/katie-bell/2010/07/29/white-house-press-gibbs-blasts-rush-limbaugh-defend-federal-automaker-ta" title="White House's Gibbs Blasts Rush Limbaugh to Defend Federal Automaker Takeover">White House&#8217;s Gibbs Blasts Rush Limbaugh to Defend Federal Automaker Takeover</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/white-houses-gibbs-blasts-rush-limbaugh-to-defend-federal-automaker-takeover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alleged Russian Spy-Chick Arrested Smuggling &quot;Super Scopes&quot; and Another Item, Described as &quot;Phased Plasma Rifle in the 40-Watt&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/alleged-russian-spy-chick-arrested-smuggling-super-scopes-and-another-item-described-as-phased-plasma-rifle-in-the-40-watt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/alleged-russian-spy-chick-arrested-smuggling-super-scopes-and-another-item-described-as-phased-plasma-rifle-in-the-40-watt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/alleged-russian-spy-chick-arrested-smuggling-super-scopes-and-another-item-described-as-phased-plasma-rifle-in-the-40-watt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(* I may have bamboozled you just a smidge on that headline) I don't ask for much competence from the media. All I ask is that once they finish writing a story, they look it over one last time...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(* I may have bamboozled you just a smidge on that headline) I don&#8217;t ask for much competence from the media. All I ask is that once they finish writing a story, they look it over one last time&#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://minx.cc/?post=304105" title="Alleged Russian Spy-Chick Arrested Smuggling &quot;Super Scopes&quot; and Another Item, Described as &quot;Phased Plasma Rifle in the 40-Watt...">Alleged Russian Spy-Chick Arrested Smuggling &quot;Super Scopes&quot; and Another Item, Described as &quot;Phased Plasma Rifle in the 40-Watt&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/alleged-russian-spy-chick-arrested-smuggling-super-scopes-and-another-item-described-as-phased-plasma-rifle-in-the-40-watt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alleged Russian Spy-Chick Arrested Smuggling &quot;Super Scopes&quot; and Another Item, Described as &quot;Phased Plasma Rifle in the 40-Watt&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/alleged-russian-spy-chick-arrested-smuggling-super-scopes-and-another-item-described-as-phased-plasma-rifle-in-the-40-watt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/alleged-russian-spy-chick-arrested-smuggling-super-scopes-and-another-item-described-as-phased-plasma-rifle-in-the-40-watt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/alleged-russian-spy-chick-arrested-smuggling-super-scopes-and-another-item-described-as-phased-plasma-rifle-in-the-40-watt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(* I may have bamboozled you just a smidge on that headline) I don't ask for much competence from the media. All I ask is that once they finish writing a story, they look it over one last time...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(* I may have bamboozled you just a smidge on that headline) I don&#8217;t ask for much competence from the media. All I ask is that once they finish writing a story, they look it over one last time&#8230;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://minx.cc/?post=304105" title="Alleged Russian Spy-Chick Arrested Smuggling &quot;Super Scopes&quot; and Another Item, Described as &quot;Phased Plasma Rifle in the 40-Watt...">Alleged Russian Spy-Chick Arrested Smuggling &quot;Super Scopes&quot; and Another Item, Described as &quot;Phased Plasma Rifle in the 40-Watt&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/alleged-russian-spy-chick-arrested-smuggling-super-scopes-and-another-item-described-as-phased-plasma-rifle-in-the-40-watt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Delaware conundrum</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-delaware-conundrum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-delaware-conundrum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-delaware-conundrum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The stakes are high in the Delaware Senate race to serve out Joe Biden's term where the victor will be eligible to serve upon election and thus will participate in the lame duck session. The choice for Republican voters, between Rep. Mike Castle and insurgent candidate Christie O'Donnell, presents a conundrum for conservatives. Castle is an immensely popular figure in Delaware. In 2008, when Barack Obama carried the state by a margin of 62-37, Castle defeated his Democratic opponent by a margin of 61-38, in a state-wide race (Delaware has just one seat in the House). Meanwhile, O'Donnell was losing to Joe Biden by a margin of 65-35. Castle's popularity in Delaware probably rivals that of Joe Biden. This may explain why the vice president's son Beau decided not to run for the Senate this year. Instead of Beau ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The stakes are high in the Delaware Senate race to serve out Joe Biden&#8217;s term where the victor will be eligible to serve upon election and thus will participate in the lame duck session. The choice for Republican voters, between Rep. Mike Castle and insurgent candidate Christie O&#8217;Donnell, presents a conundrum for conservatives. Castle is an immensely popular figure in Delaware. In 2008, when Barack Obama carried the state by a margin of 62-37, Castle defeated his Democratic opponent by a margin of 61-38, in a state-wide race (Delaware has just one seat in the House). Meanwhile, O&#8217;Donnell was losing to Joe Biden by a margin of 65-35. Castle&#8217;s popularity in Delaware probably rivals that of Joe Biden. This may explain why the vice president&#8217;s son Beau decided not to run for the Senate this year. Instead of Beau &#8230;</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/uipHnIuX_XI/026875.php" title="The Delaware conundrum">The Delaware conundrum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-delaware-conundrum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike McMahon (D, NY-13): my opponent takes Jewish money!</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/mike-mcmahon-d-ny-13-my-opponent-takes-jewish-money/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/mike-mcmahon-d-ny-13-my-opponent-takes-jewish-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/mike-mcmahon-d-ny-13-my-opponent-takes-jewish-money/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Rep. McMahon is claiming that he wanted to make sure that people knew that the 200K that his opponent Mike Grimm raised last quarter - which is, by the way, quite good for a challenger - wasn&#8217;t locally raised. Well, to start off with: there&#8217;s usually no particular stigma involved in getting money from out-of-district, although I suppose that NY-13 might be one of those districts where such things are important. Secondly, and more importantly: you&#8217;d think that if McMahon wanted to prove that Grimm ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Rep. McMahon is claiming that he wanted to make sure that people knew that the 200K that his opponent Mike Grimm raised last quarter &#8211; which is, by the way, quite good for a challenger &#8211; wasn&#8217;t locally raised. Well, to start off with: there&#8217;s usually no particular stigma involved in getting money from out-of-district, although I suppose that NY-13 might be one of those districts where such things are important. Secondly, and more importantly: you&#8217;d think that if McMahon wanted to prove that Grimm &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/moe_lane/2010/07/29/mike-mcmahon-d-ny-13-my-opponent-takes-jewish-money/" title="Mike McMahon (D, NY-13): my opponent takes Jewish money!">Mike McMahon (D, NY-13): my opponent takes Jewish money!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/mike-mcmahon-d-ny-13-my-opponent-takes-jewish-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tale of Two Anti-Semitic Rants: Oliver Stone&#8217;s Not So Bad, Mel Gibson&#8217;s Horrible</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-tale-of-two-anti-semitic-rants-oliver-stones-not-so-bad-mel-gibsons-horrible/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-tale-of-two-anti-semitic-rants-oliver-stones-not-so-bad-mel-gibsons-horrible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-tale-of-two-anti-semitic-rants-oliver-stones-not-so-bad-mel-gibsons-horrible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ -By Warner Todd Huston Some of you may recall that early in the morning of July 28 of 2006 actor Mel Gibson was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving in Los Angeles, California. During that arrest, it was reported that Gibson was alleged to have launched into a brief but vehement denunciation of Jews that were &#8220;responsible for all the wars in the world.&#8221; Famed at the time for having produced and directed the film The Passion of the Christ (2004), Gibson&#8217;s anti-Semitic tirade was the feature of news reports throughout the media for weeks after the incident. The same cannot be said, however, for Oliver Stone who just last weekend launched into his own anti-Semitic rant. Coverage of Stone&#8217;s outrageous comments...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> -By Warner Todd Huston Some of you may recall that early in the morning of July 28 of 2006 actor Mel Gibson was arrested on suspicion of drunk driving in Los Angeles, California. During that arrest, it was reported that Gibson was alleged to have launched into a brief but vehement denunciation of Jews that were &#8220;responsible for all the wars in the world.&#8221; Famed at the time for having produced and directed the film The Passion of the Christ (2004), Gibson&#8217;s anti-Semitic tirade was the feature of news reports throughout the media for weeks after the incident. The same cannot be said, however, for Oliver Stone who just last weekend launched into his own anti-Semitic rant. Coverage of Stone&#8217;s outrageous comments&#8230;</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/a-tale-of-two-anti-semitic-rants-oliver-stones-not-so-bad-mel-gibsons-horrible/" title="A Tale of Two Anti-Semitic Rants: Oliver Stone&#8217;s Not So Bad, Mel Gibson&#8217;s Horrible">A Tale of Two Anti-Semitic Rants: Oliver Stone&#8217;s Not So Bad, Mel Gibson&#8217;s Horrible</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-tale-of-two-anti-semitic-rants-oliver-stones-not-so-bad-mel-gibsons-horrible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN&#8217;s Harris: Tough on Arizona Law Author, Soft on Left-Wing Activist</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/cnns-harris-tough-on-arizona-law-author-soft-on-left-wing-activist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/cnns-harris-tough-on-arizona-law-author-soft-on-left-wing-activist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/cnns-harris-tough-on-arizona-law-author-soft-on-left-wing-activist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ On Thursday's Newsroom, CNN's Tony Harris played hardball with Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, the author of the SB1070 anti-illegal immigration law in the state, while not asking one tough question with his other guest, pro-illegal immigration activist Isabel Garcia. Surprisingly, Harris did finally explicitly identify the pro-open borders organization that Garcia leads [audio clips available here ]. The CNN anchor brought on Pearce and Garcia to discuss a federal district justice's Wednesday injunction against key provisions in the Arizona law. He identified the state senator as the "lawmaker who co-sponsored the immigration bill,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On Thursday&#8217;s Newsroom, CNN&#8217;s Tony Harris played hardball with Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, the author of the SB1070 anti-illegal immigration law in the state, while not asking one tough question with his other guest, pro-illegal immigration activist Isabel Garcia. Surprisingly, Harris did finally explicitly identify the pro-open borders organization that Garcia leads [audio clips available here ]. The CNN anchor brought on Pearce and Garcia to discuss a federal district justice&#8217;s Wednesday injunction against key provisions in the Arizona law. He identified the state senator as the &#8220;lawmaker who co-sponsored the immigration bill,&#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew-balan/2010/07/29/cnns-harris-tough-arizona-bill-author-soft-left-wing-activist" title="CNN's Harris: Tough on Arizona Law Author, Soft on Left-Wing Activist">CNN&#8217;s Harris: Tough on Arizona Law Author, Soft on Left-Wing Activist</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/cnns-harris-tough-on-arizona-law-author-soft-on-left-wing-activist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;The Field of Dreams Answer&#8217; &#8212; By: Robert Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-field-of-dreams-answer-by-robert-costa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-field-of-dreams-answer-by-robert-costa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-field-of-dreams-answer-by-robert-costa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Mike Pence (R., Ind.) talks 2012: Rep. Mike Pence: &#8220;When I get asked by school kids if I've ever thought about running for President I have one answer.&#8221; David Brody: And what is that answer? Rep. Mike Pence: &#8220;No more no less than any other kid that grew up with a cornfield in his backyard.&#8221; David Brody: The Field of Dreams answer. Rep. Mike Pence: &#8220;Look, one of the great things about America is that anybody can be anybody even a small town kid from southern Indiana who grew up with a cornfield in his backyard can dream." ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Mike Pence (R., Ind.) talks 2012: Rep. Mike Pence: &ldquo;When I get asked by school kids if I&#8217;ve ever thought about running for President I have one answer.&rdquo; David Brody: And what is that answer? Rep. Mike Pence: &ldquo;No more no less than any other kid that grew up with a cornfield in his backyard.&rdquo; David Brody: The Field of Dreams answer. Rep. Mike Pence: &ldquo;Look, one of the great things about America is that anybody can be anybody even a small town kid from southern Indiana who grew up with a cornfield in his backyard can dream.&#8221; </p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NGMzMzI0MGY4ZTc3MTRmNGI1YjFlZTI2ZWI5ZTM5MzE=" title="'The Field of Dreams Answer' -- By: Robert Costa">&#8216;The Field of Dreams Answer&#8217; &#8212; By: Robert Costa</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-field-of-dreams-answer-by-robert-costa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NEA Removes Post Encouraging Teachers To Celebrate Chinese Communist Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/nea-removes-post-encouraging-teachers-to-celebrate-chinese-communist-revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/nea-removes-post-encouraging-teachers-to-celebrate-chinese-communist-revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/nea-removes-post-encouraging-teachers-to-celebrate-chinese-communist-revolution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ By The P/Oed Patriot After I posted the Article  this morning about the National Education Association (NEA) and their recommendation that their members read Saul Alinksy&#8217;s &#8220;Rules for Radicals&#8221;, I decided to do a little digging.  It would appear that Alinsky is not the only Communist the NEA seems to hold in high regard.  According to an Article in the World Net Daily  (WND), the NEA is partial to the Communist leader Chairman Mao. On the NEA website, in the Diversity ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> By The P/Oed Patriot After I posted the Article  this morning about the National Education Association (NEA) and their recommendation that their members read Saul Alinksy&#8217;s &#8220;Rules for Radicals&#8221;, I decided to do a little digging.  It would appear that Alinsky is not the only Communist the NEA seems to hold in high regard.  According to an Article in the World Net Daily  (WND), the NEA is partial to the Communist leader Chairman Mao. On the NEA website, in the Diversity &#8230;</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/07/nea-removes-post-encouraging-teachers-to-celebrate-chinese-communist-revolution/" title="NEA Removes Post Encouraging Teachers To Celebrate Chinese Communist Revolution">NEA Removes Post Encouraging Teachers To Celebrate Chinese Communist Revolution</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/nea-removes-post-encouraging-teachers-to-celebrate-chinese-communist-revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands of New Bureaucrats to &#8216;Protect&#8217; Consumer Finances</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/thousands-of-new-bureaucrats-to-protect-consumer-finances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/thousands-of-new-bureaucrats-to-protect-consumer-finances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peter wilson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/thousands-of-new-bureaucrats-to-protect-consumer-finances/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another massive expansion of government.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another massive expansion of government.</p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/thousands_of_new_bureaucrats_t.html" title="Thousands of New Bureaucrats to 'Protect' Consumer Finances">Thousands of New Bureaucrats to &#8216;Protect&#8217; Consumer Finances</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/thousands-of-new-bureaucrats-to-protect-consumer-finances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unpacking the California Senate polling</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/unpacking-the-california-senate-polling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/unpacking-the-california-senate-polling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/unpacking-the-california-senate-polling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ From Unlikely Voter : I&#8217;ve seen a few Republicans express serious doubts about Carly Fiorina after the latest California Senate poll from Public Policy Polling, but I think close inspection of that poll should give one pause before putting too much weight on its results. Besides, the other new poll, from the Public Policy Institute of California, deep down is as bad for Barbara Boxer as the Republicans could ever hope for. Public Policy Institute of California and Public Policy Polling might sound related, but they&#8217;re not, and their polls show it. Let&#8217;s look at the PPP poll first. Tossing aside the question about hairstyles, we get a key top line result of Fiorina 40, Boxer 49 (MoE 3.95). This represents a 6 point swing toward Boxer from PPP&#8217;s last poll...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> From Unlikely Voter : I&#8217;ve seen a few Republicans express serious doubts about Carly Fiorina after the latest California Senate poll from Public Policy Polling, but I think close inspection of that poll should give one pause before putting too much weight on its results. Besides, the other new poll, from the Public Policy Institute of California, deep down is as bad for Barbara Boxer as the Republicans could ever hope for. Public Policy Institute of California and Public Policy Polling might sound related, but they&#8217;re not, and their polls show it. Let&#8217;s look at the PPP poll first. Tossing aside the question about hairstyles, we get a key top line result of Fiorina 40, Boxer 49 (MoE 3.95). This represents a 6 point swing toward Boxer from PPP&#8217;s last poll&#8230;</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/neil_stevens/2010/07/29/unpacking-the-california-senate-polling/" title="Unpacking the California Senate polling">Unpacking the California Senate polling</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/unpacking-the-california-senate-polling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh No: Enquirer Claims Levi Johnston May Father A New Baby, And Not By Bristol</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/oh-no-enquirer-claims-levi-johnston-may-father-a-new-baby-and-not-by-bristol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/oh-no-enquirer-claims-levi-johnston-may-father-a-new-baby-and-not-by-bristol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/oh-no-enquirer-claims-levi-johnston-may-father-a-new-baby-and-not-by-bristol/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a lot of thinks and believes and may bes in this article. Let's hope it's not true. In the wake of handsome Levi Johnston's announcement that he's engaged to Palin's oldest daughter Bristol, one of his old girlfriends is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of thinks and believes and may bes in this article. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s not true. In the wake of handsome Levi Johnston&#8217;s announcement that he&#8217;s engaged to Palin&#8217;s oldest daughter Bristol, one of his old girlfriends is&#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://minx.cc/?post=304103" title="Oh No: Enquirer Claims Levi Johnston May Father A New Baby, And Not By Bristol">Oh No: Enquirer Claims Levi Johnston May Father A New Baby, And Not By Bristol</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/oh-no-enquirer-claims-levi-johnston-may-father-a-new-baby-and-not-by-bristol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh No: Enquirer Claims Levi Johnston May Father A New Baby, And Not By Bristol</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/oh-no-enquirer-claims-levi-johnston-may-father-a-new-baby-and-not-by-bristol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/oh-no-enquirer-claims-levi-johnston-may-father-a-new-baby-and-not-by-bristol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/oh-no-enquirer-claims-levi-johnston-may-father-a-new-baby-and-not-by-bristol/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's a lot of thinks and believes and may bes in this article. Let's hope it's not true. In the wake of handsome Levi Johnston's announcement that he's engaged to Palin's oldest daughter Bristol, one of his old girlfriends is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a lot of thinks and believes and may bes in this article. Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s not true. In the wake of handsome Levi Johnston&#8217;s announcement that he&#8217;s engaged to Palin&#8217;s oldest daughter Bristol, one of his old girlfriends is&#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://minx.cc/?post=304103" title="Oh No: Enquirer Claims Levi Johnston May Father A New Baby, And Not By Bristol">Oh No: Enquirer Claims Levi Johnston May Father A New Baby, And Not By Bristol</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/oh-no-enquirer-claims-levi-johnston-may-father-a-new-baby-and-not-by-bristol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Sordid Tale at the University of California</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-sordid-tale-at-the-university-of-california/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-sordid-tale-at-the-university-of-california/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas lifson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-sordid-tale-at-the-university-of-california/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corruption, arrogant and unpunished.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corruption, arrogant and unpunished.</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/a_sordid_tale_at_the_universit.html" title="A Sordid Tale at the University of California">A Sordid Tale at the University of California</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/a-sordid-tale-at-the-university-of-california/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>15 minutes of fame extended: Shirley Sherrod to sue Andrew Breitbart</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/15-minutes-of-fame-extended-shirley-sherrod-to-sue-andrew-breitbart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/15-minutes-of-fame-extended-shirley-sherrod-to-sue-andrew-breitbart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/15-minutes-of-fame-extended-shirley-sherrod-to-sue-andrew-breitbart/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Yippie : Former Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod announced Thursday that she intends to sue Andrew Breitbart for posting a misleading video of Sherrod that ended up costing her job. Sherrod made the announcement at the National Association of Black Journalists conference in San Diego. “I will definitely do it,” she said. Sherrod lost her job last week after Breitbart posted a clip of a video on one of his conservative sites that appeared to show Sherrod telling an NAACP conference that she did not lend her “full force” in helping a white farmer. The full video, though, showed Sherrod had actually been speaking about how she had gotten over the racially motivated killing of her father after helping the first white farmer who had solicited her aid. Before the full video came ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yippie : Former Agriculture Department official Shirley Sherrod announced Thursday that she intends to sue Andrew Breitbart for posting a misleading video of Sherrod that ended up costing her job. Sherrod made the announcement at the National Association of Black Journalists conference in San Diego. “I will definitely do it,” she said. Sherrod lost her job last week after Breitbart posted a clip of a video on one of his conservative sites that appeared to show Sherrod telling an NAACP conference that she did not lend her “full force” in helping a white farmer. The full video, though, showed Sherrod had actually been speaking about how she had gotten over the racially motivated killing of her father after helping the first white farmer who had solicited her aid. Before the full video came &#8230;</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2010/07/29/15-minutes-of-fame-extended-shirley-sherrod-to-sue-andrew-breitbart/" title="15 minutes of fame extended: Shirley Sherrod to sue Andrew Breitbart">15 minutes of fame extended: Shirley Sherrod to sue Andrew Breitbart</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/15-minutes-of-fame-extended-shirley-sherrod-to-sue-andrew-breitbart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neither Roosevelt nor Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/neither-roosevelt-nor-reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/neither-roosevelt-nor-reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarice feldman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/neither-roosevelt-nor-reagan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Obama blew his lead and devastated his party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How Obama blew his lead and devastated his party</p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/07/neither_roosevelt_nor_reagan.html" title="Neither Roosevelt nor Reagan">Neither Roosevelt nor Reagan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/neither-roosevelt-nor-reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence Mounts That Michigan Tea Party Is Democratic Front</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/evidence-mounts-that-michigan-tea-party-is-democratic-front/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/evidence-mounts-that-michigan-tea-party-is-democratic-front/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/evidence-mounts-that-michigan-tea-party-is-democratic-front/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As state officials in Michigan review a proposed Tea Party 's petition to appear on the November ballot, evidence is mounting that the party is a front for Democratic supporters hoping to rescue embattled Democrats this fall. Earlier this week, the party submitted the names of 23 candidates it wants to place on ballots across the state this fall. Though several are for statewide offices, most are running in districts where Republicans are threatening incumbent Democrats. The Detroit Free Press reports today that a local Democratic party official had a role in helping some of the candidates become members of the Tea Party. Combine that with...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> As state officials in Michigan review a proposed Tea Party &#8217;s petition to appear on the November ballot, evidence is mounting that the party is a front for Democratic supporters hoping to rescue embattled Democrats this fall. Earlier this week, the party submitted the names of 23 candidates it wants to place on ballots across the state this fall. Though several are for statewide offices, most are running in districts where Republicans are threatening incumbent Democrats. The Detroit Free Press reports today that a local Democratic party official had a role in helping some of the candidates become members of the Tea Party. Combine that with&#8230;</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TPMmuckraker/~3/HVkqtFmIvFQ/evidence_mounts_that_michigan_tea_party_is_democra.php" title="Evidence Mounts That Michigan Tea Party Is Democratic Front">Evidence Mounts That Michigan Tea Party Is Democratic Front</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/evidence-mounts-that-michigan-tea-party-is-democratic-front/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Planned Parenthood&#8217;s Plans to Save Barbara Boxer &#8212; By: Kathryn Jean Lopez</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/planned-parenthoods-plans-to-save-barbara-boxer-by-kathryn-jean-lopez/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/planned-parenthoods-plans-to-save-barbara-boxer-by-kathryn-jean-lopez/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/planned-parenthoods-plans-to-save-barbara-boxer-by-kathryn-jean-lopez/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ From the AP today : "I believe in the sanctity of life. I believe life begins at conception," [Carly Fiorina] said in a television interview. "In my particular case, my mother-in-law was told to abort her child, who became my husband. She chose something different, obviously, and that made all the difference in her life and mine and certainly his." Kathy Kneer, president of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, said most Californians recognize that women should be able to make their own decisions. She said Fiorina's views do not take into account unintended pregnancies, such as those from abusive relationships. Kneer said Planned Parenthood hopes to raise and spend about $1 million ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> From the AP today : &#8220;I believe in the sanctity of life. I believe life begins at conception,&#8221; [Carly Fiorina] said in a television interview. &#8220;In my particular case, my mother-in-law was told to abort her child, who became my husband. She chose something different, obviously, and that made all the difference in her life and mine and certainly his.&#8221; Kathy Kneer, president of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, said most Californians recognize that women should be able to make their own decisions. She said Fiorina&#8217;s views do not take into account unintended pregnancies, such as those from abusive relationships. Kneer said Planned Parenthood hopes to raise and spend about $1 million </p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDg2NWE0MjkyZDkyYmY2ZTFmMzJhYjBhOWRiMGFkNGQ=" title="Planned Parenthood's Plans to Save Barbara Boxer -- By: Kathryn Jean Lopez">Planned Parenthood&#8217;s Plans to Save Barbara Boxer &#8212; By: Kathryn Jean Lopez</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/planned-parenthoods-plans-to-save-barbara-boxer-by-kathryn-jean-lopez/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Man from South St. Paul &#8212; By: Robert Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-man-from-south-st-paul-by-robert-costa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-man-from-south-st-paul-by-robert-costa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-man-from-south-st-paul-by-robert-costa/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R., Minn.), a potential 2012 presidential candidate, introduces himself: There is no mention of a presidential run, but, at 2:18, there is a snapshot of the White House. Pawlenty will visit Iowa this weekend. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R., Minn.), a potential 2012 presidential candidate, introduces himself: There is no mention of a presidential run, but, at 2:18, there is a snapshot of the White House. Pawlenty will visit Iowa this weekend. </p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZDhlYzQzNmNkZjA0NTg3OThkN2NmZWI5OWNkNDIyYTg=" title="The Man from South St. Paul -- By: Robert Costa">The Man from South St. Paul &#8212; By: Robert Costa</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-man-from-south-st-paul-by-robert-costa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico’s Roger Simon: Journolist Sullies &#8216;Holy Calling&#8217; of Reporting</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/politico%e2%80%99s-roger-simon-journolist-sullies-holy-calling-of-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/politico%e2%80%99s-roger-simon-journolist-sullies-holy-calling-of-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/politico%e2%80%99s-roger-simon-journolist-sullies-holy-calling-of-reporting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Roger Simon's Wednesday morning column ("Journolist veers out of bounds"), an item Rush brought up on his show this afternoon, may be one of the most delusional items ever written by a journalist attempting to defend his profession. Rich Noyes at NewsBusters covered one aspect of Simon's column on Wednesday, namely the deliciously hypocritical outrage of NBC/MSNBC reporter Chuck Todd over how the Journolist scandal "has been keeping him up nights, and he's especially frustrated that 'the right' would use it as 'a sledgehammer' against everyday journalists, 'those of us who don't practice advocacy journalism.'" I'll suggest that Simon's rendition of journalistic history is at least as offensive as...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Roger Simon&#8217;s Wednesday morning column (&#8220;Journolist veers out of bounds&#8221;), an item Rush brought up on his show this afternoon, may be one of the most delusional items ever written by a journalist attempting to defend his profession. Rich Noyes at NewsBusters covered one aspect of Simon&#8217;s column on Wednesday, namely the deliciously hypocritical outrage of NBC/MSNBC reporter Chuck Todd over how the Journolist scandal &#8220;has been keeping him up nights, and he&#8217;s especially frustrated that &#8216;the right&#8217; would use it as &#8216;a sledgehammer&#8217; against everyday journalists, &#8216;those of us who don&#8217;t practice advocacy journalism.&#8217;&#8221; I&#8217;ll suggest that Simon&#8217;s rendition of journalistic history is at least as offensive as&#8230;</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2010/07/29/politico-s-roger-simon-journolist-sullies-holy-calling-reporting" title="Politico’s Roger Simon: Journolist Sullies 'Holy Calling' of Reporting">Politico’s Roger Simon: Journolist Sullies &#8216;Holy Calling&#8217; of Reporting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/politico%e2%80%99s-roger-simon-journolist-sullies-holy-calling-of-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: We&#8217;ll Get Back Money From Auto Bailout</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/obama-well-get-back-money-from-auto-bailout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/obama-well-get-back-money-from-auto-bailout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/obama-well-get-back-money-from-auto-bailout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Original post:
Obama: We&#8217;ll Get Back Money From Auto Bailout
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Obama-Autos/2010/07/29/id/366042" title="Obama: We'll Get Back Money From Auto Bailout">Obama: We&#8217;ll Get Back Money From Auto Bailout</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/obama-well-get-back-money-from-auto-bailout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Desperate Democrats Do &#8212; By: James C. Capretta</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/what-desperate-democrats-do-by-james-c-capretta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/what-desperate-democrats-do-by-james-c-capretta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/what-desperate-democrats-do-by-james-c-capretta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It&#8217;s been a bad stretch for the Democratic majority in Congress. Their polling numbers have been going from bad to worse. The White House press secretary has openly speculated that House Democrats could lose their majority in November. Nasty disputes between Democratic congressional leaders and the White House staff have broken out in the press . One of the most senior House Democrats is now under an ethics-investigation cloud. And, worst of all, the public now sees the Obama agenda clearly and recognizes that it is far too liberal, government-heavy, and anti-business to be compatible with a vibrant American ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It&rsquo;s been a bad stretch for the Democratic majority in Congress. Their polling numbers have been going from bad to worse. The White House press secretary has openly speculated that House Democrats could lose their majority in November. Nasty disputes between Democratic congressional leaders and the White House staff have broken out in the press . One of the most senior House Democrats is now under an ethics-investigation cloud. And, worst of all, the public now sees the Obama agenda clearly and recognizes that it is far too liberal, government-heavy, and anti-business to be compatible with a vibrant American &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MjYwNTk5ZTI3ZGUyOThmZTg4YmUwY2Y2YmY0ZWQ3MWM=" title="What Desperate Democrats Do -- By: James C. Capretta">What Desperate Democrats Do &#8212; By: James C. Capretta</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/what-desperate-democrats-do-by-james-c-capretta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Does Robert Redford Keep Making Stuff Up to Kill Working-Class Jobs</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/why-does-robert-redford-keep-making-stuff-up-to-kill-working-class-jobs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/why-does-robert-redford-keep-making-stuff-up-to-kill-working-class-jobs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/why-does-robert-redford-keep-making-stuff-up-to-kill-working-class-jobs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ On June 24, 2010, I had a post on BigHollywood that examined Robert Redford’s asinine statements about the Gulf Oil Spill. From his support of a drilling moratorium to the fact that he literally blamed the spill on Dick Cheney to the way he expected George W. Bush to respond instantly to Katrina, while making excuses for President Obama’s slow response to the BP disaster, his words were just another proof that many actors in Hollywood are out of touch with reality. And although I hoped Redford would rethink his pomposity before speaking again on topics that he seems unable to comprehend, except through the prism of politics, it appears my hopes were misplaced. On Tuesday, the Huffington Post carried a statement by Redford wherein the actor lambasted Republicans for sinking...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On June 24, 2010, I had a post on BigHollywood that examined Robert Redford’s asinine statements about the Gulf Oil Spill. From his support of a drilling moratorium to the fact that he literally blamed the spill on Dick Cheney to the way he expected George W. Bush to respond instantly to Katrina, while making excuses for President Obama’s slow response to the BP disaster, his words were just another proof that many actors in Hollywood are out of touch with reality. And although I hoped Redford would rethink his pomposity before speaking again on topics that he seems unable to comprehend, except through the prism of politics, it appears my hopes were misplaced. On Tuesday, the Huffington Post carried a statement by Redford wherein the actor lambasted Republicans for sinking&#8230;</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/awr-hawkins/2010/07/29/why-does-robert-redford-keep-making-stuff-kill-working-class-jobs" title="Why Does Robert Redford Keep Making Stuff Up to Kill Working-Class Jobs">Why Does Robert Redford Keep Making Stuff Up to Kill Working-Class Jobs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/why-does-robert-redford-keep-making-stuff-up-to-kill-working-class-jobs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worth Reading &#8212; By: Mark R. Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/worth-reading-by-mark-r-levin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/worth-reading-by-mark-r-levin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/worth-reading-by-mark-r-levin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governor Brewer's expedited briefing and hearing request to the Ninth Circuit re: the District Court's stay. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor Brewer&#8217;s expedited briefing and hearing request to the Ninth Circuit re: the District Court&#8217;s stay. </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZjMzODYwMGU4MTA4OWRjMWFkYTAzZmE3ODFiZDU0NTM=" title="Worth Reading -- By: Mark R. Levin">Worth Reading &#8212; By: Mark R. Levin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/worth-reading-by-mark-r-levin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protesters Arrested in March Against Arpaio&#8217;s Office</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/protesters-arrested-in-march-against-arpaios-office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/protesters-arrested-in-march-against-arpaios-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/protesters-arrested-in-march-against-arpaios-office/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Read more:
Protesters Arrested in March Against Arpaio&#8217;s Office
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Arizona-Immigration/2010/07/29/id/366040" title="Protesters Arrested in March Against Arpaio's Office">Protesters Arrested in March Against Arpaio&#8217;s Office</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/protesters-arrested-in-march-against-arpaios-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can﻿ we have your liver then?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/can%ef%bb%bf-we-have-your-liver%c2%a0then/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/can%ef%bb%bf-we-have-your-liver%c2%a0then/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/can%ef%bb%bf-we-have-your-liver%c2%a0then/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Todd Zywicki) Geologic time makes you feel so sort of insignificant , doesn’t it? Via Tom Smith . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Todd Zywicki) Geologic time makes you feel so sort of insignificant , doesn’t it? Via Tom Smith . </p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/volokh/mainfeed/~3/KZOq1opMtLQ/" title="Can﻿ we have your liver then?">Can﻿ we have your liver then?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/can%ef%bb%bf-we-have-your-liver%c2%a0then/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NewsBusters 5th Anniversary: A Look Back at Some of Our Top Posts on Media Flubs</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/newsbusters-5th-anniversary-a-look-back-at-some-of-our-top-posts-on-media-flubs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/newsbusters-5th-anniversary-a-look-back-at-some-of-our-top-posts-on-media-flubs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/newsbusters-5th-anniversary-a-look-back-at-some-of-our-top-posts-on-media-flubs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As our readers know, to celebrate the 5th anniversary of NewsBusters, we have started a weekly Five for Five feature to countdown the blog's top twenty five posts. Last week we began with the top five media flubs caught by NewsBusters and on Friday we continue with the top five posts embarrassing the media. As part of the anniversary celebration, we have picked out a couple posts from each of the five categories and asked the authors to reflect back on writing them up. They share their thoughts on how they caught the particular media moment and describe the impact their post had. We begin with a look back at two of the top media flubs: "Up a Creek: Accusing Bush of Video Stunt, 'Today' Gets Caught in Stunt of Its Own" by Mark...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> As our readers know, to celebrate the 5th anniversary of NewsBusters, we have started a weekly Five for Five feature to countdown the blog&#8217;s top twenty five posts. Last week we began with the top five media flubs caught by NewsBusters and on Friday we continue with the top five posts embarrassing the media. As part of the anniversary celebration, we have picked out a couple posts from each of the five categories and asked the authors to reflect back on writing them up. They share their thoughts on how they caught the particular media moment and describe the impact their post had. We begin with a look back at two of the top media flubs: &#8220;Up a Creek: Accusing Bush of Video Stunt, &#8216;Today&#8217; Gets Caught in Stunt of Its Own&#8221; by Mark&#8230;</p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/kyle-drennen/2010/07/29/newsbusters-5th-anniversary-look-back-some-our-top-posts" title="NewsBusters 5th Anniversary: A Look Back at Some of Our Top Posts on Media Flubs">NewsBusters 5th Anniversary: A Look Back at Some of Our Top Posts on Media Flubs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/newsbusters-5th-anniversary-a-look-back-at-some-of-our-top-posts-on-media-flubs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Amnesty Memo &#8212; By: Robert VerBruggen</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-amnesty-memo-by-robert-verbruggen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-amnesty-memo-by-robert-verbruggen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-amnesty-memo-by-robert-verbruggen/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ According to an internal U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services memo going the rounds of Capitol Hill and obtained by National Review , the agency is considering ways in which it could enact &#8220;meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action&#8221; -- that is, without the consent of the American people through a vote in Congress. &#8220;This memorandum offers administrative relief options to . . . reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization,&#8221; it reads. Also: &#8220;In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> According to an internal U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services memo going the rounds of Capitol Hill and obtained by National Review , the agency is considering ways in which it could enact &ldquo;meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action&rdquo; &#8212; that is, without the consent of the American people through a vote in Congress. &ldquo;This memorandum offers administrative relief options to . . . reduce the threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without authorization,&rdquo; it reads. Also: &ldquo;In the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance&#8230;</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NTk3Y2EwODQxMTBlOTE4MmI3MzUwZjBkNjkzODBhMGY=" title="The Amnesty Memo -- By: Robert VerBruggen">The Amnesty Memo &#8212; By: Robert VerBruggen</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/the-amnesty-memo-by-robert-verbruggen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lindsey Graham, Tough Guy? &#8212; By: Mark Krikorian</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lindsey-graham-tough-guy-by-mark-krikorian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lindsey-graham-tough-guy-by-mark-krikorian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lindsey-graham-tough-guy-by-mark-krikorian/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would it be cynical of me to think that McCain's "little jerk" is just trying to burnish his tough-on-immigration bona fides?: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) announced Wednesday night that he is considering introducing a constitutional amendment that would change existing law to no longer grant citizenship to the children of immigrants born in the United States. Yeah, right. So the guy doesn't want to do what's necessary to actually stop illegal immigration, but he wants to make sure that the children born to all the illegals he helps bring here become U.S.-born illegal aliens?...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be cynical of me to think that McCain&#8217;s &#8220;little jerk&#8221; is just trying to burnish his tough-on-immigration bona fides?: Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) announced Wednesday night that he is considering introducing a constitutional amendment that would change existing law to no longer grant citizenship to the children of immigrants born in the United States. Yeah, right. So the guy doesn&#8217;t want to do what&#8217;s necessary to actually stop illegal immigration, but he wants to make sure that the children born to all the illegals he helps bring here become U.S.-born illegal aliens?&#8230;</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YmJjZmFlOWQ5YTFiMjdkMzVmOGY4MWI0ZjYwM2U0NjE=" title="Lindsey Graham, Tough Guy? -- By: Mark Krikorian">Lindsey Graham, Tough Guy? &#8212; By: Mark Krikorian</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/lindsey-graham-tough-guy-by-mark-krikorian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin&#8217;s New Book Cover Revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/sarah-palins-new-book-cover-revealed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/sarah-palins-new-book-cover-revealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/sarah-palins-new-book-cover-revealed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The rest is here:
Sarah Palin&#8217;s New Book Cover Revealed
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/US-Books-Palin/2010/07/29/id/366031" title="Sarah Palin's New Book Cover Revealed">Sarah Palin&#8217;s New Book Cover Revealed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/sarah-palins-new-book-cover-revealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Taylor Takes on That Blinder/Zandi Paper &#8212; By: Stephen Spruiell</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/john-taylor-takes-on-that-blinderzandi-paper-by-stephen-spruiell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/john-taylor-takes-on-that-blinderzandi-paper-by-stephen-spruiell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/john-taylor-takes-on-that-blinderzandi-paper-by-stephen-spruiell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I flagged a New York Times article about a working paper by Alan Blinder and Mark Zandi purporting to show that the TARP/Fed/stimulus saved us from a certain depression. John Taylor was quoted in the article as sounding skeptical of the paper's findings. He's now had a chance to take a closer look. Seems like he was right to be skeptical . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I flagged a New York Times article about a working paper by Alan Blinder and Mark Zandi purporting to show that the TARP/Fed/stimulus saved us from a certain depression. John Taylor was quoted in the article as sounding skeptical of the paper&#8217;s findings. He&#8217;s now had a chance to take a closer look. Seems like he was right to be skeptical . </p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZGVlZWY5ODcwYWExODhiNDM4YTVhZWIwZDQ0M2QyYTA=" title="John Taylor Takes on That Blinder/Zandi Paper -- By: Stephen Spruiell">John Taylor Takes on That Blinder/Zandi Paper &#8212; By: Stephen Spruiell</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/john-taylor-takes-on-that-blinderzandi-paper-by-stephen-spruiell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Raise Taxes on Small Biz &#8212; By: Stephen Spruiell</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dont-raise-taxes-on-small-biz-by-stephen-spruiell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dont-raise-taxes-on-small-biz-by-stephen-spruiell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dont-raise-taxes-on-small-biz-by-stephen-spruiell/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin, speaking of TV, I made an appearance on MSNBC's The Ed Show last night to talk about this article . As you might expect, Ed Schultz and I don't see eye to eye on this subject; he sees nothing wrong with politicizing the banking sector as long as it's his guys doing the politicizing. At the end of the segment, he asked what I would do instead to help small business. I told him it might be a good idea not to raise their taxes. Well, that did it: Ed talked over the rest of my spiel, drowning out the part where I pointed out that raising taxes on the top two tax brackets would hit over 70 percent of small-business profits. Others have said...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, speaking of TV, I made an appearance on MSNBC&#8217;s The Ed Show last night to talk about this article . As you might expect, Ed Schultz and I don&#8217;t see eye to eye on this subject; he sees nothing wrong with politicizing the banking sector as long as it&#8217;s his guys doing the politicizing. At the end of the segment, he asked what I would do instead to help small business. I told him it might be a good idea not to raise their taxes. Well, that did it: Ed talked over the rest of my spiel, drowning out the part where I pointed out that raising taxes on the top two tax brackets would hit over 70 percent of small-business profits. Others have said&#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NGFkNjY2MjY1NGEyMjkxYjgyM2EyM2M0MjZkYjQ5MGI=" title="Don't Raise Taxes on Small Biz -- By: Stephen Spruiell">Don&#8217;t Raise Taxes on Small Biz &#8212; By: Stephen Spruiell</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/dont-raise-taxes-on-small-biz-by-stephen-spruiell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ethanol Really Is B.S. &#8212; By: Kevin D. Williamson</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ethanol-really-is-b-s-by-kevin-d-williamson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ethanol-really-is-b-s-by-kevin-d-williamson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ethanol-really-is-b-s-by-kevin-d-williamson/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As usual, the real political news is on the business page : Renewable fuel still might flow at the $200 million former [read: bankrupt]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, the real political news is on the business page : Renewable fuel still might flow at the $200 million former [read: bankrupt]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2010/07/29/ethanol-really-is-b-s-by-kevin-d-williamson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/9 queries in 2.408 seconds using disk

Served from: www.liberalwhoppers.com @ 2010-07-30 12:54:03 -->