–
Ignite Managing Director
Maurice Watts

You have to be joking though. There is now way to spin this- outside of maybe Florida and Texas (not because all those folks believe this bologna- but because they want their jobs back).

And moon-mining? Does Newt know how deep the Eart’s crust is and how much natural resources we have? (not mention how scrap metals can now easily and efficiently be recycled? (I’ve some some beer money from a scrap-yard down the street before- we DON’T need any moon-mining….Ugghhh. This is a tough pill to swallow, Newt.).

We should have a strong space program and be forward-thinkers*, but not when we have been running record deficits for years (even before the Crash), and have a national debt of 14 trillion. Cut that debt to around 5 trillion… and maybe then we can begin talking about a moon state.

China is already talking about military (weapon-equipped) sattelites, which is on the other hand (very scary to hear), not a completely unrealistic endeavor that NASA (and the Military) may have to confront and build up against (let’s hope that day does not come though- Space Wars? Good Lord, War is already hell here on Earth. Let’s stay down here all, no?

*by the way, this is the most “progressive/liberal” idea I have ever heard of. Way to blow up your campaign Newt!

Rudolph’s opinion on anything is worthless. Don’t take my word for it, check his record.

For whatever reason, Rush has a real hatred going for Newt.

Mitt’s in decline, as Newt’s (counter) attack ads start to bite: Romney’s only up 2 pts in SC in the latest poll, and Gingrich is out front in NC already- the day’s soon coming when Romney regrets forcing the doughboy to go nuclear.

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander, right Mittens?

ha ha ha

Willard’s investing funds came from people who wanted to take a calculated risk for profits whereas Obama gambled taxpayer money meant to run government on companies who had NO chance of making any profit which the evidence is clear.

Layoffs were required at GM due to Unions pushing costs above what GM could pay where government had absolutely no business sticking their nose into it at all.

Do folks figuratively are in line with it……

Chris Kyle is a fraud. It did not achieve even 10% of what he claim he did in his book. He apparently claimed the marks of others as his.

I don’t even know if this guy is real since what he say in his book look so out of whack to any navy seal.

Backflip

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhyMplwY6HY

No one says that a 100% Asian neighborhood needs more diversity.

No one says that a 100% Muslim neighborhood needs more diversity.

According to anti-Whites, they are already 100% diverse.

All White neighborhoods and only White neighborhoods need to be more diverse. White neighborhoods only stop needing to be more diverse when there are no White people left in them.

Anti-racist is a codeword people HIDE BEHIND to be anti-White.

One side longs to be pleasing to human-beings & the ways of man; the other side longs to be pleasing to God as they understand who He is by their relationship with Him. This is the division of Christ. He brings peace to the individual who loves Him above the ways of the world He will judge.

Whether or not one feels he or she was born a homosexual is not the issue. The issue is whether or not they will deny self and choose to live God’s way or not, just like every other human being; His grace restores us when we sin. But when we willfully choose to go on in our own way, there we find dissatisfaction, internal conflict and external disputes, and ultimately the judgement of God.

Those who are supporting gay and lesbian youth, in this writer’s opinon, are part of their confusion. They were born male or female and that is how they are to be raised giving them a choice adds to identity confusion. Once grown their choices become their own. We love them for the value that is intrinsically theirs having been given life by God. We do not have to approve of those things opposing His will. Neither do we take life and death into our own hands on this issue. Gay bashing and killing is wrong. I think Jesus would say do you know my Truth, for I am the Truth, the Way, and the Life.

Harry Reid
522 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

600 East William Street, #302
Carson City, NV 89701

333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 8016
Las Vegas, NV 89101

400 South Virginia Street, Suite 902
Reno, NV 89501

Following are my plans for my platform, ” A much smaller and smarter government”.

Alright America, as to my plan to bring our country back to an even keel and gain back the respect of other nations who have been Kow-Towed to by our change and hope so called president. His change is for a predominately homosexual government body and his hope is for tyrannical rule over us.

As our forefathers instruct us in the Declaration of Independence to oust a form of government harming the people and install a new form. With your help we can initiate a form of selection, not election that will have no need of the electoral college, the biggest political crooks. In this manner, those in their peak both physically and mentally in the age group of 30 to 50, the first year may or someone else can submit their name to their district office where as thousands of names will be entered if not millions. Year two they will be screened by a panel of clergy to eject all undesirables. Year three tested by experts in all fields with process of elimination to arrive with one person from each state. These fifty in year four will enter a large chamber and each to a cubicle with computer and video-cam. Computer has another series of tests more stringent than previously taken, video cam is for eyes of world to pan cubicles to view facial expressions and body movements of those being tested. Highest scorer is new president with each lessening of scores to fill new government cabinet. The forty nine will have access to a large computer bank and they will be advisors and afilliates to the president. None will have a personal staff.
Benjamin Franklin during those four years will, with out a salary put America back on course. First to obliterate Obamacare and since we are not in Russia dump the czars. Next we ” can” T.S.A., E.P.A., N.E.A. and any other agency not performing a real service. Everyone will be placed on a 13% flat tax. Make a million, pay 13%, make a thousand, pay 13% , no tax shelters or credits. If you are being paid a wage, you pay taxes. This will result in approximately an 80% reduction in the I.R.S. compliment with an option to continue working in uniform with U.S. troops returned from policing countries unwarranted to police our own borders against illegal entry.
To countries the present administration has indebted us to for billions of dollars, inform them that what has been received is partial payment of what they owe us from WWII and to write it off. And, to those corporations that took advantage of us through NAFTA to utilize slave labor leaving minimal employment here that if they manufacture in other countries, they sell their products in other countries, not here and if they opt to return and pay the American worker a decent living wage, they are welcome. Where there is oil, drill and some of the more abundant petroleum properties are federally owned going against the constitution whereas the government is not to own property other than property deemed by the American people to be a National park or monument. All other such properties will be auctioned to the highest private American buyer, no foreign entities allowed.
Upon learning that the United Nations are the issuers of social security numbers and have complete domination over the I.M.F. and the I.R.S. with American taxpayers picking up the major funding for it’s existence and that now it consist mainly of Islamic nations who would enslave us, I feel it time to pull the plug along with our hard earned tax dollars funding these Godless Idol worshipers and turn over to U.S. agencies activities that should be performed by them such as the issuance of S.S. numbers by the Social Security Administration. It is no wonder illegals are able to draw benefits with out ever having worked here. However, I do feel that those having lived here for a period of five years and are contributing to our nation to be schooled for a period of six months on U.S. History, cultures and our language and then sworn in as American citizens. Refusals to be deported with families.
Welfare to be enacted by certain churches in each community with subsidization from the government. For those who are qualified by a physician appointed by the church, will receive supplementary assistance, all others advised to seek employment. (There will be some exceptions)

Mr. Franklin will serve his four years (without salary as did President George Washington) to implement his plan and when his term has expired, put a petition on the internet for America to sign to end the two party system on a National level while maintaining on local and state levels to preserve a balance. This action will send the career politicians packing making way for fifty honest people being groomed to lead the people, not rule with salary approved by the people to a more abundant and brighter future and at the end of their four years receive a generous severance package making room for next 50 being groomed.

What I have written here to be executed by the powers of the office will in fact cause all worthwhile proposals by other candidates to fall in place without the expense of a huge war chest. All that is needed is for America to wake up and head us in the right direction for a more prosperous and brighter future for coming generations to seek Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.

Benjamin Franklin

However, this article’s reporter forgot to include the simple and very important information like: WHEN did he serve his mission? This would allow us to understand what the average conditions were in that period of time; WHERE, specifically, did he serve? This would allow us to know if he served in MANY parts of France and not just in Paris.

I’ll wager the “$10,000″ that he indeed lived at one time during his 2 1/2 year mission in a rural area (for typical Mormon missionaries rotate around to many areas of a given country) where he indeed could have used a hole in the floor as the toilet and a hose tied to the sink for a shower.

Come on Mr. Reporter. This was an ill-attempt of half truths at best to discredit Mr. Romney. You should be fired for such reckless reporting!

http://vimeo.com/7258531

Homelessness has been a problem in Central Florida for years. It’s great that there is some recent attention to it, but hopefully we will all continue to help these families.

Oh the irony

Or is it just something you made up because YOU KNOW there’s NO ONE in your party who’s not only influential but TRUTHFUL as well??

I suspect, also, that people in the Republican party machinery benefit somehow from existing structures that the Tea Party operatives call “corrupt” and plan to discard. True citizen government is a serious threat to those who get rich by playing the system, and they exist in both parties. You did not think they would give up their personal piggy bank without a fight, did you?

MH Petry

I would like to add the following:

In my work entitled “Natural (Native) Born Citizen Defined” (online), which was done in the year 2009, I have in Footnote 5 and Footnote 6 the following:

(Text) A citizen of the United States is no longer a citizen of the Union; that is, the United States of America, but now is a citizen of the United States (Fourteenth Amendment), that is a citizen of the territories and possessions of the United States, including the District of Columbia as well as federal enclaves (Footnote 4), (Footnote 5), whereas a citizen of the several States is a citizen of the Union; that is, the United States of America. (Footnote 6) The proper question to be asked is if a citizen of the United States, after the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, can be considered a native born citizen (natural born citizen) eligible to be President of the United States of America?

(fn 5) “To determine, then, who were citizens of the United States before the adoption of the [14th] amendment it is necessary to ascertain what persons originally associated themselves together to form the nation, and what were afterwards admitted to membership. Looking at the Constitution itself we find that it was ordained and established by ‘THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES,’ and then going further back, we find that these were the people of the several States that had before dissolved the political bands which connected them with Great Britain, and assumed a separate and equal station among the powers of the earth, and that had by Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, in which they took the name of ‘the United States of America,’ entered in to a firm league of friendship with each other for their common defence, the security of their liberties and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other against all force offered to or attack made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretence whatever.

Whoever, then, was one of the people of either of these States when the Constitution of the United States was adopted, became ipso facto a citizen – a member of the nation created by its adoption. He was one the persons associating together to form the nation, and was, consequently, one of its original citizens. As to this there has never been a doubt. Disputes have arisen as to whether or not certain persons or certain classes of persons were part of the people at the time, but never as to their citizenship if they were.” Minor v. Happersett: 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1874).

(fn 6) “Beyond question, a state may, through judicial proceedings take possession of the assets of an insolvent foreign corporation within its limits, and distribute such assets or their proceeds among creditors according to their respective rights. But may it exclude citizens of other states from such distribution until the claims of its own citizens shall have been first satisfied? In the administration of the property of an insolvent foreign corporation by the courts of the state in which it is doing business, will the Constitution of the United States permit discrimination against individual creditors of such corporations because of their being citizens of other states, and not citizens of the state in which such administration occurs? . . . .
We hold such discrimination against citizens of other states to be repugnant to the second section of the fourth article of the Constitution of the United States, although, generally speaking, the state has the power to prescribe the conditions upon which foreign corporations may enter its territory for purposes of business. Such a power cannot be exerted with the effect of defeating or impairing rights secured to citizens of the several states by the supreme law of the land. Indeed, all the powers possessed by a state must be exercised consistently with the privileges and immunities granted or protected by the Constitution of the United States. . . . .

We must not be understood as saying that a citizen of one state is entitled to enjoy in another state every privilege that may be given in the latter to its own citizens. There are privileges that may be accorded by a state to its own people in which citizens of other states may not participate except in conformity to such reasonable regulations as may be established by the state. For instance, a state cannot forbid citizens of other states from suing in its courts, that right being enjoyed by its own people; but it may require a nonresident, although a citizen of another state, to give bond for costs, although such bond be not required of a resident. Such a regulation of the internal affairs of a state cannot reasonably be characterized as hostile to the fundamental rights of citizens of other states. So, a state may, by rule uniform in its operation as to citizens of the several states, require residence within its limits for a given time before a citizen of another state who becomes a resident thereof shall exercise the right of suffrage or become eligible to office. It has never been supposed that regulations of that character materially interfered with the enjoyment by citizens of each state of the privileges and immunities secured by the Constitution to citizens of the several states. The Constitution forbids only such legislation affecting citizens of the respective states as will substantially or practically put a citizen of one state in a condition of alienage when he is within or when he removes to another state, or when asserting in another state the rights that commonly appertain to those who are part of the political community known as THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES, by and for whom the government of the Union was ordained and established. Blake v. McClung: 172 US. 239, 247-248, 254-255, 256-257 (1898).

After I placed this article online, the case of Blake v. McClung, was altered on the Justia.com website. Before, it read as it does in the bounded volumes of the United States Reports (of the Supreme Court of the United States). However, after (and now) it reads as follows:

“. . . So a state may, by rule uniform in its operation as to citizens of the several states, require residence within its limits for a given time before a citizen of another state, who becomes a resident thereof, shall exercise the right of suffrage or become eligible to office. It has never been supposed that regulations of that character materially interfered with the enjoyment by citizens of each State of the privileges and immunities secured by the Constitution to citizens of the several states. The Constitution forbids only such legislation affecting citizens of the respective states as will substantially or practically put a citizen of one state in a condition of alienage when he is within or when he removes to another state, or when asserting in another state the rights that commonly appertain to those who are part of the political community known as THE THE UNITED STATES, by and for whom the government of the Union was ordained and established.”

The words “PEOPLE OF” have been removed.

I am of the opinion that this was done intentionally. A primary source such as Justia should be considered a reliable service in providing accurate documentation relating to the opinions issued by the Supreme Court of the United States. Its representations of the opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States should be the same as the opinions appear in the standard; that is, the bounded volumes (with the exception of recent decisions, which being bench opinions, then slip opinions, should be replaced with the official and final versions later).