<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Liberal Whoppers &#187; Blog Feed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/author/blog-feed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com</link>
	<description>The truth without the spin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>House Brings Conservative Reform to Broken Highway System</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/house-brings-conservative-reform-to-broken-highway-system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/house-brings-conservative-reform-to-broken-highway-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/house-brings-conservative-reform-to-broken-highway-system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This morning we awoke to find that the  New York Times Editorial Board  and Redstate’s Erick Erickson had aligned themselves on an issue by both taking a shot at the  American Energy &#038; Infrastructure Jobs Act , a bill the House will consider next week. Usually when a situation like that arises, something’s amiss. And that is certainly the case today. It’s not surprising the New York Times hates the bill – it’s the most conservative plan for America’s infrastructure in anyone’s lifetime. That’s why Erick’s post this morning was so surprising. But there’s an explanation. Put simply, he has his facts wrong. I’ve known Erick a number of years, and he’s usually a straight...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> This morning we awoke to find that the  New York Times Editorial Board  and Redstate’s Erick Erickson had aligned themselves on an issue by both taking a shot at the  American Energy &#038; Infrastructure Jobs Act , a bill the House will consider next week. Usually when a situation like that arises, something’s amiss. And that is certainly the case today. It’s not surprising the New York Times hates the bill – it’s the most conservative plan for America’s infrastructure in anyone’s lifetime. That’s why Erick’s post this morning was so surprising. But there’s an explanation. Put simply, he has his facts wrong. I’ve known Erick a number of years, and he’s usually a straight&#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/brendanbuck/2012/02/09/house-brings-conservative-reform-to-broken-highway-system/" title="House Brings Conservative Reform to Broken Highway System">House Brings Conservative Reform to Broken Highway System</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/house-brings-conservative-reform-to-broken-highway-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cnn-reporters-call-cpac-a-conservative-petri-dish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cnn-reporters-call-cpac-a-conservative-petri-dish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cnn-reporters-call-cpac-a-conservative-petri-dish/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Shortly before noon Thursday, live from the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)< CNN political reporter Peter Hamby described the gathering as a “conservative petri dish” to measure “how Mitt Romney is received and how his challengers are received too.” Anchor Suzanne Malveaux chimed in: “I love that, conservative petri dish. That’s a great way to describe it.” A petri dish is defined as “a shallow circular dish with a loose-fitting cover, used to culture bacteria or other microorganisms.” As if conservatives are some kind of organism in a contained space to be studied from above by the “scientists” at CNN for our harmful effects. We’re not the Ebola virus, but that seems as if it’s how ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Shortly before noon Thursday, live from the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC)< CNN political reporter Peter Hamby described the gathering as a “conservative petri dish” to measure “how Mitt Romney is received and how his challengers are received too.” Anchor Suzanne Malveaux chimed in: “I love that, conservative petri dish. That’s a great way to describe it.” A petri dish is defined as “a shallow circular dish with a loose-fitting cover, used to culture bacteria or other microorganisms.” As if conservatives are some kind of organism in a contained space to be studied from above by the “scientists” at CNN for our harmful effects. We’re not the Ebola virus, but that seems as if it’s how ...</p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2012/02/09/cnn-reporters-call-cpac-conservative-petri-dish" title="CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’">CNN Reporters Call CPAC a ‘Conservative Petri Dish’</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cnn-reporters-call-cpac-a-conservative-petri-dish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare in Wonderland</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamacare-in-wonderland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamacare-in-wonderland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamacare-in-wonderland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ That’s the title of a new article by Gary Lawson and me, forthcoming in a symposium issue of Boston University’s American Journal of Law &#038; Medicine.  The Journal has a large readership among medical professionals who are interested in legal issues relating to medicine. Accordingly, if you have been following the VC’s debate on the ACA over the past couple years, most of what is in the article will already be familiar to you. Here is the abstract: The question whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) is “unconstitutional” is thorny, not simply because it presents intriguing issues of interpretation but also because it starkly illustrates the ambiguity that often accompanies the word “unconstitutional.” The term...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> That’s the title of a new article by Gary Lawson and me, forthcoming in a symposium issue of Boston University’s American Journal of Law &#038; Medicine.  The Journal has a large readership among medical professionals who are interested in legal issues relating to medicine. Accordingly, if you have been following the VC’s debate on the ACA over the past couple years, most of what is in the article will already be familiar to you. Here is the abstract: The question whether the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) is “unconstitutional” is thorny, not simply because it presents intriguing issues of interpretation but also because it starkly illustrates the ambiguity that often accompanies the word “unconstitutional.” The term&#8230;</p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://volokh.com/2012/02/09/obamacare-in-wonderland/" title="Obamacare in Wonderland">Obamacare in Wonderland</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamacare-in-wonderland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s Energy Policy In Action</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamas-energy-policy-in-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamas-energy-policy-in-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamas-energy-policy-in-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or is that inaction? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or is that inaction? </p>
<p>View original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wizbangblog.com/~r/Wizbang/~3/iDCJdDRAbNU/" title="Obama’s Energy Policy In Action">Obama’s Energy Policy In Action</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamas-energy-policy-in-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Triumph of Top Totty</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-triumph-of-top-totty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-triumph-of-top-totty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-triumph-of-top-totty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The exile of T op Totty (beer) from a House of Commons bar (following a co mplaint f rom the Labour Party’s “equalities” spokeswoman) has been a big story in the UK in the last week, and it appears to have taken a happy turn: Family-run Staffordshire brewer Slater’s revealed it has seen sales jump since one of its ales upset a MP Kate Green and attracted headlines around the world last week.   Slater’s sales director Fay Slater announced that the firm has been bombarded with phone calls and emails from landlords wanting to get their hands on barrels of Top Totty. Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The exile of T op Totty (beer) from a House of Commons bar (following a co mplaint f rom the Labour Party’s “equalities” spokeswoman) has been a big story in the UK in the last week, and it appears to have taken a happy turn: Family-run Staffordshire brewer Slater’s revealed it has seen sales jump since one of its ales upset a MP Kate Green and attracted headlines around the world last week.   Slater’s sales director Fay Slater announced that the firm has been bombarded with phone calls and emails from landlords wanting to get their hands on barrels of Top Totty. Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290669/triumph-top-totty-andrew-stuttaford" title="The Triumph of Top Totty">The Triumph of Top Totty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-triumph-of-top-totty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Meta</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/getting-meta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/getting-meta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/getting-meta/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ When attack ads attack attack ads. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When attack ads attack attack ads. </p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/YHPOX0DNnJA/getting_meta.php" title="Getting Meta">Getting Meta</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/getting-meta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(With a Nod to Christopher Wren), if You Seek the Establishment, Look Around You…</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/with-a-nod-to-christopher-wren-if-you-seek-the-establishment-look-around-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/with-a-nod-to-christopher-wren-if-you-seek-the-establishment-look-around-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/with-a-nod-to-christopher-wren-if-you-seek-the-establishment-look-around-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ From the diaries… We had a smallish political brush-fire here in Michigan in 1982. The grizzled old William Milliken had finally decided that 124 terms was enough as Governor, and he was hanging up the cleats. Jim Blanchard, a weirdo Democrat downriver Detroit Big Labor congressman decided he would run, as did a few other miscreants from the Democrat party. Even the benighted John Conyers toyed with the idea, until someone pointed it out to the congressman that if he were elected Governor, he’d actually have to LIVE in Michigan, and to heck with that. On the Republican side, all the usual suspect lined up: Jim Brickley, Bill Milliken’s lieutenant ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> From the diaries… We had a smallish political brush-fire here in Michigan in 1982. The grizzled old William Milliken had finally decided that 124 terms was enough as Governor, and he was hanging up the cleats. Jim Blanchard, a weirdo Democrat downriver Detroit Big Labor congressman decided he would run, as did a few other miscreants from the Democrat party. Even the benighted John Conyers toyed with the idea, until someone pointed it out to the congressman that if he were elected Governor, he’d actually have to LIVE in Michigan, and to heck with that. On the Republican side, all the usual suspect lined up: Jim Brickley, Bill Milliken’s lieutenant &#8230;</p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/conservativecurmudgeon/2012/02/09/with-a-nod-to-christopher-wren-if-you-seek-the-establishment-look-around-you/" title="(With a Nod to Christopher Wren), if You Seek the Establishment, Look Around You…">(With a Nod to Christopher Wren), if You Seek the Establishment, Look Around You…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/with-a-nod-to-christopher-wren-if-you-seek-the-establishment-look-around-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not to Worry, Chris Hayes Chirpily Reassures, US Not &#8216;In Hock&#8217; to China</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/not-to-worry-chris-hayes-chirpily-reassures-us-not-in-hock-to-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/not-to-worry-chris-hayes-chirpily-reassures-us-not-in-hock-to-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/not-to-worry-chris-hayes-chirpily-reassures-us-not-in-hock-to-china/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ If $1.1 trillion owned by Americans to China is no big deal, as MSNBC weekend host Chris Hayes would have you believe, at what point does it become one -- five trillion? Ten? Ever? Hayes, filling in as guest host on "The Rachel Maddow Show" Feb. 6, was criticizing GOP Senate candidate Pete Hoekstra's "Debbie Spend It Now" ad against incumbent Democrat Senator Debbie Stabenow. (video after page break) Hoekstra's ad, Hayes predictably inveighed, was racist as all get out and "makes some substantive claims, which are ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If $1.1 trillion owned by Americans to China is no big deal, as MSNBC weekend host Chris Hayes would have you believe, at what point does it become one &#8212; five trillion? Ten? Ever? Hayes, filling in as guest host on &#8220;The Rachel Maddow Show&#8221; Feb. 6, was criticizing GOP Senate candidate Pete Hoekstra&#8217;s &#8220;Debbie Spend It Now&#8221; ad against incumbent Democrat Senator Debbie Stabenow. (video after page break) Hoekstra&#8217;s ad, Hayes predictably inveighed, was racist as all get out and &#8220;makes some substantive claims, which are &#8230;</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jack-coleman/2012/02/09/not-worry-chris-hayes-chirpily-reassures-americans-not-hock-china" title="Not to Worry, Chris Hayes Chirpily Reassures, US Not 'In Hock' to China">Not to Worry, Chris Hayes Chirpily Reassures, US Not &#8216;In Hock&#8217; to China</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/not-to-worry-chris-hayes-chirpily-reassures-us-not-in-hock-to-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Abortion-Rights Advocates Who Compiled the HHS Mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-abortion-rights-advocates-who-compiled-the-hhs-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-abortion-rights-advocates-who-compiled-the-hhs-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-abortion-rights-advocates-who-compiled-the-hhs-mandate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ We have been told that an “independent” panel from the Institute of Medicine put together the recommendations upon which the current mandate we’ve been talking so much about here and elsewhere is based. But it’s worth noticing that the “reproductive rights” activists were well represented on that panel. Human Life International further compiled : Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> We have been told that an “independent” panel from the Institute of Medicine put together the recommendations upon which the current mandate we’ve been talking so much about here and elsewhere is based. But it’s worth noticing that the “reproductive rights” activists were well represented on that panel. Human Life International further compiled : Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290664/abortion-rights-advocates-who-compiled-hhs-mandate-kathryn-jean-lopez" title="The Abortion-Rights Advocates Who Compiled the HHS Mandate">The Abortion-Rights Advocates Who Compiled the HHS Mandate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-abortion-rights-advocates-who-compiled-the-hhs-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RE: Another HHS Mandate Primer</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/re-another-hhs-mandate-primer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/re-another-hhs-mandate-primer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/re-another-hhs-mandate-primer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ That video Kathryn linked to, of last night’s event at the Catholic Information Center , is a “must see.” It was an excellent panel discussion on the HHS mandate and will be of interest to anyone—Catholic or otherwise—with a concern for religious liberty. The point is worth reiterating: this is not just a “Catholic Issue.” You will find nary a sectarian argument in the entire 86+ minute video. Anyone interested in a serious discussion of the issue by a panel with unequaled expertise in the matter will find this video well worth their while. Keep reading this ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> That video Kathryn linked to, of last night’s event at the Catholic Information Center , is a “must see.” It was an excellent panel discussion on the HHS mandate and will be of interest to anyone—Catholic or otherwise—with a concern for religious liberty. The point is worth reiterating: this is not just a “Catholic Issue.” You will find nary a sectarian argument in the entire 86+ minute video. Anyone interested in a serious discussion of the issue by a panel with unequaled expertise in the matter will find this video well worth their while. Keep reading this </p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290665/re-another-hhs-mandate-primer-stephen-p-white" title="RE: Another HHS Mandate Primer">RE: Another HHS Mandate Primer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/re-another-hhs-mandate-primer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Truing the Voter Rolls, Voter Integrity Project: Many States have More Voters Registered Than Voting-Age Population</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/truing-the-voter-rolls-voter-integrity-project-many-states-have-more-voters-registered-than-voting-age-population/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/truing-the-voter-rolls-voter-integrity-project-many-states-have-more-voters-registered-than-voting-age-population/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/truing-the-voter-rolls-voter-integrity-project-many-states-have-more-voters-registered-than-voting-age-population/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judicial Watch on an election integrity project to pressure the states to clean up voter registration rolls to satisfy Section 8 of the National Voting Rights Act (NVRA), a law that all too many states have been violating for years. Judicial Watch and True The Vote have sent letters to California, Ohio, Indiana, and Florida ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judicial Watch on an election integrity project to pressure the states to clean up voter registration rolls to satisfy Section 8 of the National Voting Rights Act (NVRA), a law that all too many states have been violating for years. Judicial Watch and True The Vote have sent letters to California, Ohio, Indiana, and Florida </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wizbangblog.com/~r/Wizbang/~3/HMfDgJpnQcw/" title="Truing the Voter Rolls, Voter Integrity Project: Many States have More Voters Registered Than Voting-Age Population">Truing the Voter Rolls, Voter Integrity Project: Many States have More Voters Registered Than Voting-Age Population</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/truing-the-voter-rolls-voter-integrity-project-many-states-have-more-voters-registered-than-voting-age-population/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misreporting Citizens United</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/misreporting-citizens-united/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/misreporting-citizens-united/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/misreporting-citizens-united/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Dan Abrams is on the case (via Instapundit). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Dan Abrams is on the case (via Instapundit). </p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290663/misreporting-citizens-united-ramesh-ponnuru" title="Misreporting Citizens United">Misreporting Citizens United</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/misreporting-citizens-united/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archbishop Dolan Betrayed by Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/archbishop-dolan-betrayed-by-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/archbishop-dolan-betrayed-by-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/archbishop-dolan-betrayed-by-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, head of the Archdiocese of New York, has now publicly criticized the Obama administration’s new HHS mandate. Specifically, he has stated that the President Obama betrayed a commitment made to him weeks ago in a personal meeting. CBS reports : Dolan said he met with the president weeks ago in the Oval Office to talk  about the law . Dolan said the president gave his promise the provision would go away, but it hasn’t. “It seems to be at odds with very sincere assurances that he gave me, that he wanted to continue to work with the church in these endeavors and views and projects he shared a passionate interest in, so I can’t figure it out,” Dolan said. Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, head of the Archdiocese of New York, has now publicly criticized the Obama administration’s new HHS mandate. Specifically, he has stated that the President Obama betrayed a commitment made to him weeks ago in a personal meeting. CBS reports : Dolan said he met with the president weeks ago in the Oval Office to talk  about the law . Dolan said the president gave his promise the provision would go away, but it hasn’t. “It seems to be at odds with very sincere assurances that he gave me, that he wanted to continue to work with the church in these endeavors and views and projects he shared a passionate interest in, so I can’t figure it out,” Dolan said. Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290661/archbishop-dolan-betrayed-obama-patrick-brennan" title="Archbishop Dolan Betrayed by Obama">Archbishop Dolan Betrayed by Obama</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/archbishop-dolan-betrayed-by-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Murphy’s Love Affair with Big Labor</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tim-murphys-love-affair-with-big-labor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tim-murphys-love-affair-with-big-labor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tim-murphys-love-affair-with-big-labor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ From the Diaries by Leon… Keith Impink runs Westmoreland Electric, a small business in Tarrs, Pennsylvania which was founded in 1988 with two employees and a truck.  His company, now 65 employees strong, is the type of job creator we should empower to move our state and country out of these difficult economic times. The painful irony for local job creators like Keith is their very own Congressman, Tim Murphy, has consistently voted to make it harder for small businesses to grow, thrive and prosper. Small business can’t compete against Big Labor, and it’s tough to find a more ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> From the Diaries by Leon… Keith Impink runs Westmoreland Electric, a small business in Tarrs, Pennsylvania which was founded in 1988 with two employees and a truck.  His company, now 65 employees strong, is the type of job creator we should empower to move our state and country out of these difficult economic times. The painful irony for local job creators like Keith is their very own Congressman, Tim Murphy, has consistently voted to make it harder for small businesses to grow, thrive and prosper. Small business can’t compete against Big Labor, and it’s tough to find a more &#8230;</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/evanfeinberg/2012/02/09/tim-murphy%E2%80%99s-love-affair-with-big-labor/" title="Tim Murphy’s Love Affair with Big Labor">Tim Murphy’s Love Affair with Big Labor</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tim-murphys-love-affair-with-big-labor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;You Were Thinking Aboot Sausage&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/you-were-thinking-aboot-sausage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/you-were-thinking-aboot-sausage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/you-were-thinking-aboot-sausage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, it's an understandable slip of the tongue....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it&#8217;s an understandable slip of the tongue&#8230;.</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://minx.cc/?post=326566" title="&quot;You Were Thinking Aboot Sausage&quot;">&quot;You Were Thinking Aboot Sausage&quot;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/you-were-thinking-aboot-sausage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iFile</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/ifile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/ifile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/ifile/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The FBI releases the file it had on Steve Jobs. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The FBI releases the file it had on Steve Jobs. </p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/mH-WBBinu2w/ifile.php" title="iFile">iFile</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/ifile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;If You Go To Kill The King&#8230;&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/if-you-go-to-kill-the-king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/if-you-go-to-kill-the-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/if-you-go-to-kill-the-king/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Why Planned Parenthood knew it had to hit back hard when Komen pulled its funding. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Why Planned Parenthood knew it had to hit back hard when Komen pulled its funding. </p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/Jm-iQuuqXEA/if_you_go_to_kill_the_king.php" title="'If You Go To Kill The King...'">&#8216;If You Go To Kill The King&#8230;&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/if-you-go-to-kill-the-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Stanford Review Turns 25</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-stanford-review-turns-25/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-stanford-review-turns-25/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-stanford-review-turns-25/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This year marks the 25th anniversary of The Stanford Review,  and this weekend, Review staffers and alumni are gathering in Palo Alto to celebrate the occasion. The Review has published every semester since 1987, making it the second-oldest continuously publishing conservative student newspaper in the country. During this time, the Review has provided a source of conservative commentary to the Stanford campus and has been a persistent thorn in the side of the university administration. In fact, in one of the Review ’s finest moments, a Review staffer even defeated ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> This year marks the 25th anniversary of The Stanford Review,  and this weekend, Review staffers and alumni are gathering in Palo Alto to celebrate the occasion. The Review has published every semester since 1987, making it the second-oldest continuously publishing conservative student newspaper in the country. During this time, the Review has provided a source of conservative commentary to the Stanford campus and has been a persistent thorn in the side of the university administration. In fact, in one of the Review ’s finest moments, a Review staffer even defeated &#8230;</p>
<p>Read more from the original source:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290656/ithe-stanford-reviewi-turns-25-michael-j-new" title="The Stanford Review Turns 25">The Stanford Review Turns 25</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-stanford-review-turns-25/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fiscal Conservative “Go It Alone” Strategy Failed</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-fiscal-conservative-go-it-alone-strategy-failed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-fiscal-conservative-go-it-alone-strategy-failed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-fiscal-conservative-go-it-alone-strategy-failed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ From the diaries by Leon… Let me begin with two brief qualifiers.  First, I believe in fiscal conservatism.  I am a 100% fiscally conservative believer in small government.  I also happen to be 100% in favor of social conservatism and a strong national defense.  So, in short, I am a Reagan conservative.  The following diary is not a critique of fiscal conservatism but rather those fiscal conservatives who continually bash social conservatives while at the same time asking for their vote.  Second, those aforementioned fiscal conservatives were not exactly loners.  They simply wanted social conservatives to shut up and move to the back of the bus.  Despite their rhetoric, they still very much need social conservatives to triumph at the ballot box. Throughout 2010 and 2011, fiscal conservatives loudly proclaimed that the upcoming presidential election was...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> From the diaries by Leon… Let me begin with two brief qualifiers.  First, I believe in fiscal conservatism.  I am a 100% fiscally conservative believer in small government.  I also happen to be 100% in favor of social conservatism and a strong national defense.  So, in short, I am a Reagan conservative.  The following diary is not a critique of fiscal conservatism but rather those fiscal conservatives who continually bash social conservatives while at the same time asking for their vote.  Second, those aforementioned fiscal conservatives were not exactly loners.  They simply wanted social conservatives to shut up and move to the back of the bus.  Despite their rhetoric, they still very much need social conservatives to triumph at the ballot box. Throughout 2010 and 2011, fiscal conservatives loudly proclaimed that the upcoming presidential election was&#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/kipling/2012/02/09/the-fiscal-conservative-go-it-alone-strategy-failed/" title="The Fiscal Conservative “Go It Alone” Strategy Failed">The Fiscal Conservative “Go It Alone” Strategy Failed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-fiscal-conservative-go-it-alone-strategy-failed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Warren vs. HHS Mandate: &#8216;rather go to jail than cave&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/rick-warren-vs-hhs-mandate-rather-go-to-jail-than-cave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/rick-warren-vs-hhs-mandate-rather-go-to-jail-than-cave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/rick-warren-vs-hhs-mandate-rather-go-to-jail-than-cave/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Evangelical pastor Rick Warren tweets :  I’m not a Catholic but I stand in 100% solidarity with my brothers &#038; sisters to practice their belief against govt pressure  Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Evangelical pastor Rick Warren tweets :  I’m not a Catholic but I stand in 100% solidarity with my brothers &#038; sisters to practice their belief against govt pressure  Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290654/rick-warren-vs-hhs-mandate-rather-go-jail-cave-kathryn-jean-lopez" title="Rick Warren vs. HHS Mandate: 'rather go to jail than cave'">Rick Warren vs. HHS Mandate: &#8216;rather go to jail than cave&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/rick-warren-vs-hhs-mandate-rather-go-to-jail-than-cave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking the Times on Abortion Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tracking-the-times-on-abortion-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tracking-the-times-on-abortion-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tracking-the-times-on-abortion-statistics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ On Monday, Andrew Rosenthal of the New York Times had a post on his Loyal Opposition blog analyzing whether or not abortion is rare. Interestingly, he argued that both sides in the abortion debate have a vested interest in making the case that abortions are common. People who are pro-life want to call for greater restrictions on abortion by suggesting that access to abortion is too easy. Supporters of legal abortion want to make the case that obtaining an abortion is fairly common and thus part of the medical and cultural mainstream. According to the Guttmacher Institute, there were 1.2 million abortions performed in 2008. Rosenthal finds that during the same year, there were more blood transfusions and cardiac catherizations and about the same number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed. ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On Monday, Andrew Rosenthal of the New York Times had a post on his Loyal Opposition blog analyzing whether or not abortion is rare. Interestingly, he argued that both sides in the abortion debate have a vested interest in making the case that abortions are common. People who are pro-life want to call for greater restrictions on abortion by suggesting that access to abortion is too easy. Supporters of legal abortion want to make the case that obtaining an abortion is fairly common and thus part of the medical and cultural mainstream. According to the Guttmacher Institute, there were 1.2 million abortions performed in 2008. Rosenthal finds that during the same year, there were more blood transfusions and cardiac catherizations and about the same number of upper gastrointestinal endoscopies performed. &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290651/tracking-itimesi-abortion-statistics-michael-j-new" title="Tracking the Times on Abortion Statistics">Tracking the Times on Abortion Statistics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tracking-the-times-on-abortion-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Way Greece?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/which-way-greece/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/which-way-greece/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/which-way-greece/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ One question that rarely arises about Greece is “where did all those hundreds of billions of Euros really go?” I think most visitors could easily answer that they were not all squandered on pensions and inflated government staffs and salaries. The Greece of 1975 was changed into a simulacrum of northern Europe by all sorts of vast public-works projects — new bridges, port facilities, freeways, museums, light rail, the Athens subway and airport, new agricultural projects, as well as hundreds of luxury hotels well outside Athens and thousands of upscale vacation homes dotting the Greek coastline for 1,000 miles. Suddenly...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> One question that rarely arises about Greece is “where did all those hundreds of billions of Euros really go?” I think most visitors could easily answer that they were not all squandered on pensions and inflated government staffs and salaries. The Greece of 1975 was changed into a simulacrum of northern Europe by all sorts of vast public-works projects — new bridges, port facilities, freeways, museums, light rail, the Athens subway and airport, new agricultural projects, as well as hundreds of luxury hotels well outside Athens and thousands of upscale vacation homes dotting the Greek coastline for 1,000 miles. Suddenly&#8230;</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290650/which-way-greece-victor-davis-hanson" title="Which Way Greece?">Which Way Greece?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/which-way-greece/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Woman Who (Partially) Silenced Chris Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-woman-who-partially-silenced-chris-matthews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-woman-who-partially-silenced-chris-matthews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-woman-who-partially-silenced-chris-matthews/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Steven Hayward) Over on NRO’s Corner Charles Cooke notes with delight that Chris Matthews has abruptly stopped his nightly plugs for his new hagiography of John F. Kennedy, most likely because of the obvious embarrassment of Mimi Alford’s new memoir Once Upon A Secret .  There’s nothing in Alford’s story that we didn’t already know in general outline about JFK’s priapism, though the bit about how JFK pimped her out to Dave Powers ought to leave a mark. Alford’s book arrives too late to make it into my Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents , ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Steven Hayward) Over on NRO’s Corner Charles Cooke notes with delight that Chris Matthews has abruptly stopped his nightly plugs for his new hagiography of John F. Kennedy, most likely because of the obvious embarrassment of Mimi Alford’s new memoir Once Upon A Secret .  There’s nothing in Alford’s story that we didn’t already know in general outline about JFK’s priapism, though the bit about how JFK pimped her out to Dave Powers ought to leave a mark. Alford’s book arrives too late to make it into my Politically Incorrect Guide to the Presidents , &#8230;</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/4Y4nPdg2NDw/the-woman-who-partially-silenced-chris-matthews.php" title="The Woman Who (Partially) Silenced Chris Matthews">The Woman Who (Partially) Silenced Chris Matthews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-woman-who-partially-silenced-chris-matthews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell Slams &#8216;Liberal Thugs&#8217; in CPAC Speech</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mcconnell-slams-liberal-thugs-in-cpac-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mcconnell-slams-liberal-thugs-in-cpac-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mcconnell-slams-liberal-thugs-in-cpac-speech/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Politico reports : Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell plans to launch a fierce attack on the Obama administration and congressional Democrats, calling out “liberal thugs” for intimidating their opponents in the name of political expediency. Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Politico reports : Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell plans to launch a fierce attack on the Obama administration and congressional Democrats, calling out “liberal thugs” for intimidating their opponents in the name of political expediency. Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290649/mcconnell-slams-liberal-thugs-cpac-speech-brian-bolduc" title="McConnell Slams 'Liberal Thugs' in CPAC Speech">McConnell Slams &#8216;Liberal Thugs&#8217; in CPAC Speech</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mcconnell-slams-liberal-thugs-in-cpac-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leno Mocks Opponents of Gay Marriage, CBS Highlights Quote</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/leno-mocks-opponents-of-gay-marriage-cbs-highlights-quote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/leno-mocks-opponents-of-gay-marriage-cbs-highlights-quote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/leno-mocks-opponents-of-gay-marriage-cbs-highlights-quote/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The idea that marriage is a sacred institution is apparently a joke to Jay Leno and CBS. Leno declared that those who wish to defend the sanctity of marriage should "ban Kardashian weddings." CBS apparently thought that Leno's crack was too good to pass up, highlighting Leno's quote on at the start of its February 8 "CBS This Morning" show. In his opening monologue on the February 7 "Tonight Show," Jay Leno expressed support for gay marriage: "A huge victory for gay rights. A federal appeals court today ruled that California cannot ban same sex marriage. Here's my feeling, let me tell you. If you want to respect the sanctity of marriage, ban Kardashian weddings. Ok, why don't you ban those? Those do...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The idea that marriage is a sacred institution is apparently a joke to Jay Leno and CBS. Leno declared that those who wish to defend the sanctity of marriage should &#8220;ban Kardashian weddings.&#8221; CBS apparently thought that Leno&#8217;s crack was too good to pass up, highlighting Leno&#8217;s quote on at the start of its February 8 &#8220;CBS This Morning&#8221; show. In his opening monologue on the February 7 &#8220;Tonight Show,&#8221; Jay Leno expressed support for gay marriage: &#8220;A huge victory for gay rights. A federal appeals court today ruled that California cannot ban same sex marriage. Here&#8217;s my feeling, let me tell you. If you want to respect the sanctity of marriage, ban Kardashian weddings. Ok, why don&#8217;t you ban those? Those do&#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/paul-wilson/2012/02/09/leno-mocks-opponents-gay-marriage-cbs-highlights-quote" title="Leno Mocks Opponents of Gay Marriage, CBS Highlights Quote">Leno Mocks Opponents of Gay Marriage, CBS Highlights Quote</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/leno-mocks-opponents-of-gay-marriage-cbs-highlights-quote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Politics of Conscience</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-politics-of-conscience/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-politics-of-conscience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-politics-of-conscience/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I was on MSNBC a short while ago with a Democratic strategist who insisted that her party held the upper hand in the debate over the Obama administration’s attempt to force religious groups to offer contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients to their employers. (She didn’t describe the policy quite that way, of course.) Several arguments have been advanced for this view: Contraception is widely practiced and uncontroversial with the public at large; polls show that most people and even a majority of Catholics approve of the new rule; Republicans will come across as trying to curb women’s access to contraception if they fight the rule; and the administration can easily find a compromise that Republicans would look (more) extreme in rejecting. Here’s why I find these...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I was on MSNBC a short while ago with a Democratic strategist who insisted that her party held the upper hand in the debate over the Obama administration’s attempt to force religious groups to offer contraception, sterilization, and abortifacients to their employers. (She didn’t describe the policy quite that way, of course.) Several arguments have been advanced for this view: Contraception is widely practiced and uncontroversial with the public at large; polls show that most people and even a majority of Catholics approve of the new rule; Republicans will come across as trying to curb women’s access to contraception if they fight the rule; and the administration can easily find a compromise that Republicans would look (more) extreme in rejecting. Here’s why I find these&#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290648/politics-conscience-ramesh-ponnuru" title="The Politics of Conscience">The Politics of Conscience</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-politics-of-conscience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Statistics for 9 Feb 12</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/economic-statistics-for-9-feb-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/economic-statistics-for-9-feb-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/economic-statistics-for-9-feb-12/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ T oday’s economic statistical releases: Initial claims for unemployment fell 15,000 last week to 358,000, while the 4-week average dropped 11,000 to 366,250. This is strongly positive for job growth. Or it means that, after losing 7 million jobs since 2007, we’ve pretty much fired everyone who can usefully be fired. The Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index rose to -41.7 from -44.8 last week. In wholesale trade, inventories rose  a strong 1.0% in December, and a 1.3% rise in sales leaves the stock-to-sales ratio unchanged at 1.15. ~ Dale Franks Google+ Profile Twitter Feed ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> T oday’s economic statistical releases: Initial claims for unemployment fell 15,000 last week to 358,000, while the 4-week average dropped 11,000 to 366,250. This is strongly positive for job growth. Or it means that, after losing 7 million jobs since 2007, we’ve pretty much fired everyone who can usefully be fired. The Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index rose to -41.7 from -44.8 last week. In wholesale trade, inventories rose  a strong 1.0% in December, and a 1.3% rise in sales leaves the stock-to-sales ratio unchanged at 1.15. ~ Dale Franks Google+ Profile Twitter Feed </p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.qando.net/?p=12432" title="Economic Statistics for 9 Feb 12">Economic Statistics for 9 Feb 12</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/economic-statistics-for-9-feb-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi Rep. Wants The Gulf Of Mexico Renamed The &#8216;Gulf Of America&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mississippi-rep-wants-the-gulf-of-mexico-renamed-the-gulf-of-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mississippi-rep-wants-the-gulf-of-mexico-renamed-the-gulf-of-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mississippi-rep-wants-the-gulf-of-mexico-renamed-the-gulf-of-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A lawmaker in Mississippi is pushing to change the name of "the body of water located directly south" of the state, the Gulf of Mexico, to the "Gulf of America." State Rep. Steve Holland (D) has introduced HB 150 , which says that "for all official purposes within the state of Mississippi, the body of water located directly south of Hancock, Harrison and Jackson counties shall be known as the 'Gulf Of America'; and for related purposes." The blog bestofneworleans.com first pointed out the bill, which is currently being considered by the House Marine Resources Committee. If passed, it will take effect on ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A lawmaker in Mississippi is pushing to change the name of &#8220;the body of water located directly south&#8221; of the state, the Gulf of Mexico, to the &#8220;Gulf of America.&#8221; State Rep. Steve Holland (D) has introduced HB 150 , which says that &#8220;for all official purposes within the state of Mississippi, the body of water located directly south of Hancock, Harrison and Jackson counties shall be known as the &#8216;Gulf Of America&#8217;; and for related purposes.&#8221; The blog bestofneworleans.com first pointed out the bill, which is currently being considered by the House Marine Resources Committee. If passed, it will take effect on &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TPMmuckraker/~3/lc9a1tGJq24/mississippi_rep_wants_the_gulf_of_mexico_renamed_t.php" title="Mississippi Rep. Wants The Gulf Of Mexico Renamed The 'Gulf Of America'">Mississippi Rep. Wants The Gulf Of Mexico Renamed The &#8216;Gulf Of America&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mississippi-rep-wants-the-gulf-of-mexico-renamed-the-gulf-of-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mythical &quot;Koranic Injunction Against Compulsion in Islam&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-mythical-koranic-injunction-against-compulsion-in-islam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-mythical-koranic-injunction-against-compulsion-in-islam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-mythical-koranic-injunction-against-compulsion-in-islam/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The persecution of Christians, particularly in Islamic countries, and the indifference of Western elites (particularly the Obama administration which, as Ed Whelan observes , cavalierly adopts the rhetoric of war in its campaign against believing Christians), are outrages that must not be allowed to stand. It is great comfort today to find Conrad Black and Nina Shea shedding light on NRO. Nevertheless, I hope my friend Nina does not mind if I rail for a moment at her allusion to the mythical “ Koranic injunction against compulsion in Islam,” which she suggests is transgressed by the fact that “Christians held in Saudi prisons for practicing their faith can be pressured to convert to Islam.” I admit this is a bugbear of mine, but it is worth hammering because it is the very core...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The persecution of Christians, particularly in Islamic countries, and the indifference of Western elites (particularly the Obama administration which, as Ed Whelan observes , cavalierly adopts the rhetoric of war in its campaign against believing Christians), are outrages that must not be allowed to stand. It is great comfort today to find Conrad Black and Nina Shea shedding light on NRO. Nevertheless, I hope my friend Nina does not mind if I rail for a moment at her allusion to the mythical “ Koranic injunction against compulsion in Islam,” which she suggests is transgressed by the fact that “Christians held in Saudi prisons for practicing their faith can be pressured to convert to Islam.” I admit this is a bugbear of mine, but it is worth hammering because it is the very core&#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290640/mythical-koranic-injunction-against-compulsion-islam-andrew-c-mccarthy" title="The Mythical &quot;Koranic Injunction Against Compulsion in Islam&quot;">The Mythical &quot;Koranic Injunction Against Compulsion in Islam&quot;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-mythical-koranic-injunction-against-compulsion-in-islam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nuke the News: Bitterly Clinging to Attacks on Religion</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/nuke-the-news-bitterly-clinging-to-attacks-on-religion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/nuke-the-news-bitterly-clinging-to-attacks-on-religion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuke the news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/nuke-the-news-bitterly-clinging-to-attacks-on-religion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ * Obama is apparently dumber than we thought. He knew that forcing religious organizations to pay for contraception — and abortifacients — would be controversial , but he thought it would play out as, “This is about contraception; no one finds contraception controversial anymore.” Of course, it’s played out as religious liberty issue, which is huge deal to Americans. But Mr. Bitter Clinger isn’t really in tune with Americans, so it caught him by surprise. Obama: no useful experience or abilities, arrogant, and completely out of touch with the concerns of regular Americans — I’m starting to think he might be a bad president. * Government dependence has shot up 23% under Obama . He probably considers that a success — “Look at how many more people government is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> * Obama is apparently dumber than we thought. He knew that forcing religious organizations to pay for contraception — and abortifacients — would be controversial , but he thought it would play out as, “This is about contraception; no one finds contraception controversial anymore.” Of course, it’s played out as religious liberty issue, which is huge deal to Americans. But Mr. Bitter Clinger isn’t really in tune with Americans, so it caught him by surprise. Obama: no useful experience or abilities, arrogant, and completely out of touch with the concerns of regular Americans — I’m starting to think he might be a bad president. * Government dependence has shot up 23% under Obama . He probably considers that a success — “Look at how many more people government is&#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.imao.us/index.php/2012/02/nuke-the-news-bitterly-clinging-to-attacks-on-religion/" title="Nuke the News: Bitterly Clinging to Attacks on Religion">Nuke the News: Bitterly Clinging to Attacks on Religion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/nuke-the-news-bitterly-clinging-to-attacks-on-religion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linda Greenhouse, Wrong Again</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/linda-greenhouse-wrong-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/linda-greenhouse-wrong-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/linda-greenhouse-wrong-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Ed Whelan points out the shoddiness of her analysis of the HHS regulations. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ed Whelan points out the shoddiness of her analysis of the HHS regulations. </p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290636/linda-greenhouse-wrong-again-ramesh-ponnuru" title="Linda Greenhouse, Wrong Again">Linda Greenhouse, Wrong Again</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/linda-greenhouse-wrong-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the Arab Spring Good or Bad for America?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-the-arab-spring-good-or-bad-for-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-the-arab-spring-good-or-bad-for-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-the-arab-spring-good-or-bad-for-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ That’s the title of my CPAC panel this afternoon.  I’ll be sharing the stage with Jim Gillmore, president of the Free Congress Foundation and the former governor of Virginia, and Zalmay Khalilzad, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq and to Afghanistan.  (Incidentally, I think I can safely say that I’m the least distinguished member of that panel.)  If you’re not at CPAC or don’t care to make it over to the Marriott Ballroom at 2:05 p.m. , here’s a brief look at my position: First, when confronting a truly mass movement (as the Arab Spring is), the resulting governments are much more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> That’s the title of my CPAC panel this afternoon.  I’ll be sharing the stage with Jim Gillmore, president of the Free Congress Foundation and the former governor of Virginia, and Zalmay Khalilzad, former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq and to Afghanistan.  (Incidentally, I think I can safely say that I’m the least distinguished member of that panel.)  If you’re not at CPAC or don’t care to make it over to the Marriott Ballroom at 2:05 p.m. , here’s a brief look at my position: First, when confronting a truly mass movement (as the Arab Spring is), the resulting governments are much more</p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290633/arab-spring-good-or-bad-america-david-french" title="Is the Arab Spring Good or Bad for America?">Is the Arab Spring Good or Bad for America?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-the-arab-spring-good-or-bad-for-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vending Machines, Airports &amp; Slogans</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/vending-machines-airports-slogans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/vending-machines-airports-slogans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/vending-machines-airports-slogans/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In Impromptus today , I mention a new item in the vending machines of Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania: the “morning after” pill. Slip in 25 bucks, and apparently that baby slides down. (Well, not a real baby.) In my column, I say, “Remember a time in America when what you got from a vending machine was, say, a Mars bar? Was that a worse time in America than now?” A reader writes, “I remember a time when cigarette machines were quite common.” True, true. The course of American morality is quite peculiar. Keep]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In Impromptus today , I mention a new item in the vending machines of Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania: the “morning after” pill. Slip in 25 bucks, and apparently that baby slides down. (Well, not a real baby.) In my column, I say, “Remember a time in America when what you got from a vending machine was, say, a Mars bar? Was that a worse time in America than now?” A reader writes, “I remember a time when cigarette machines were quite common.” True, true. The course of American morality is quite peculiar. Keep</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290634/vending-machines-airports-slogans-jay-nordlinger" title="Vending Machines, Airports &amp; Slogans">Vending Machines, Airports &amp; Slogans</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/vending-machines-airports-slogans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Greek Deal?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/a-greek-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/a-greek-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/a-greek-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Yes and no. Via the Montreal Gazette : Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yes and no. Via the Montreal Gazette : Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290631/greek-deal-andrew-stuttaford" title="A Greek Deal?">A Greek Deal?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/a-greek-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum in Mitt&#8217;s crosshairs</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/santorum-in-mitts-crosshairs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/santorum-in-mitts-crosshairs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/santorum-in-mitts-crosshairs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Opening several lines of attack.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opening several lines of attack.</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/santorum_in_mitts_crosshairs.html" title="Santorum in Mitt's crosshairs">Santorum in Mitt&#8217;s crosshairs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/santorum-in-mitts-crosshairs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing, Growth, and Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/housing-growth-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/housing-growth-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/housing-growth-and-politics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The president can’t bring himself to put politics aside, aid the housing-market recovery, and generate stronger economic growth. Odd for an administration supposedly laser-focused on jobs. Today’s evidence comes from two important news items. Early reports are that after a full-court press by the administration, government officials are securing a $25 billion deal with five major banks — Ally Financial, Bank of America Corp., Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, and Wells Fargo — to settle claims of abuse in the foreclosure process. The $25 billion consists of $5 billion in penalties and $20 billion in aid to homeowners who are underwater in their mortgages, but current on their payments. The five banks involved are responsible for ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The president can’t bring himself to put politics aside, aid the housing-market recovery, and generate stronger economic growth. Odd for an administration supposedly laser-focused on jobs. Today’s evidence comes from two important news items. Early reports are that after a full-court press by the administration, government officials are securing a $25 billion deal with five major banks — Ally Financial, Bank of America Corp., Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase, and Wells Fargo — to settle claims of abuse in the foreclosure process. The $25 billion consists of $5 billion in penalties and $20 billion in aid to homeowners who are underwater in their mortgages, but current on their payments. The five banks involved are responsible for </p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290630/housing-growth-and-politics-douglas-holtz-eakin" title="Housing, Growth, and Politics">Housing, Growth, and Politics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/housing-growth-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Austin Teacher Charged with Giving Morning-After Pill to Student</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/austin-teacher-charged-with-giving-morning-after-pill-to-student/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/austin-teacher-charged-with-giving-morning-after-pill-to-student/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/austin-teacher-charged-with-giving-morning-after-pill-to-student/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In Austin, a teacher gives one of her students the “morning after” pill — and it doesn’t work out so well : Steinberg, who also was a math teacher at LBJ, gave the pill to a 16-year-old student who was crying in her class about Jan. 26 because she had unprotected sex with her boyfriend, [an arrest] affidavit said. . . . . The student did not have a prescription for the medication, which is required for females younger than 17, the affidavit said. The student and her boyfriend then gave Steinberg money for the medication, the affidavit ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In Austin, a teacher gives one of her students the “morning after” pill — and it doesn’t work out so well : Steinberg, who also was a math teacher at LBJ, gave the pill to a 16-year-old student who was crying in her class about Jan. 26 because she had unprotected sex with her boyfriend, [an arrest] affidavit said. . . . . The student did not have a prescription for the medication, which is required for females younger than 17, the affidavit said. The student and her boyfriend then gave Steinberg money for the medication, the affidavit &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://patterico.com/2012/02/09/austin-teacher-charged-with-giving-morning-after-pill-to-student/" title="Austin Teacher Charged with Giving Morning-After Pill to Student">Austin Teacher Charged with Giving Morning-After Pill to Student</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/austin-teacher-charged-with-giving-morning-after-pill-to-student/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC vs. the Occupiers: Keep calm and carry silly string</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cpac-vs-the-occupiers-keep-calm-and-carry-silly-string/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cpac-vs-the-occupiers-keep-calm-and-carry-silly-string/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cpac-vs-the-occupiers-keep-calm-and-carry-silly-string/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Photoshop credit: VVM The Right twittersphere has been buzzing for the past week about planned ambushes of CPAC 2012, the annual gathering of conservatives in D.C., by the Occupier mob. The conference kicks off today and every major Republican speaker has a giant target on his/her back — because every fame-seeker, troll, Michael Moore wannabe, and glitter-bomber will be looking to claim their 15 minutes of infamy. Lachlan Markay at Heritage reported on the saboteurs’ schemes earlier this week: During a Thursday meeting at McPherson Square, until Saturday the epicenter of the protests, Occupiers brainstormed tactics for shutting down or disrupting the conference, according to a source who ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Photoshop credit: VVM The Right twittersphere has been buzzing for the past week about planned ambushes of CPAC 2012, the annual gathering of conservatives in D.C., by the Occupier mob. The conference kicks off today and every major Republican speaker has a giant target on his/her back — because every fame-seeker, troll, Michael Moore wannabe, and glitter-bomber will be looking to claim their 15 minutes of infamy. Lachlan Markay at Heritage reported on the saboteurs’ schemes earlier this week: During a Thursday meeting at McPherson Square, until Saturday the epicenter of the protests, Occupiers brainstormed tactics for shutting down or disrupting the conference, according to a source who &#8230;</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://michellemalkin.com/2012/02/09/cpac-vs-the-occupiers-keep-calm-and-carry-silly-string/" title="CPAC vs. the Occupiers: Keep calm and carry silly string">CPAC vs. the Occupiers: Keep calm and carry silly string</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cpac-vs-the-occupiers-keep-calm-and-carry-silly-string/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US may seek to &#8216;militarize&#8217; Syria crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/us-may-seek-to-militarize-syria-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/us-may-seek-to-militarize-syria-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/us-may-seek-to-militarize-syria-crisis/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not a good idea - at this time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a good idea &#8211; at this time.</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/us_may_seek_to_militarize_syria_crisis.html" title="US may seek to 'militarize' Syria crisis">US may seek to &#8216;militarize&#8217; Syria crisis</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/us-may-seek-to-militarize-syria-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Caterpillar Says It Will Not Build New North American Plant in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/caterpillar-says-it-will-not-build-new-north-american-plant-in-illinois/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/caterpillar-says-it-will-not-build-new-north-american-plant-in-illinois/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climategate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/caterpillar-says-it-will-not-build-new-north-american-plant-in-illinois/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Fruits of Liberal Policy– ( Illinois Policy Institute ) A stunning new report by the Illinois Policy Institute revealed how Illinois lost one resident every 10 minutes during the past fifteen years. As Illinois lost residents to migration the state also lost out on a net of $26 billion in taxable income to out-migration from 1995 to 2010. Now this… Caterpillar Inc. announced that it would not be building its new North American plant in Illinois. Finance reported: Caterpillar Inc. will not be building its new North American plant anywhere in the state of Illinois, officials with the company told local leaders Tuesday, with part of the reason being continued concerns about the business climate in the state. The company will instead focus on ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The Fruits of Liberal Policy– ( Illinois Policy Institute ) A stunning new report by the Illinois Policy Institute revealed how Illinois lost one resident every 10 minutes during the past fifteen years. As Illinois lost residents to migration the state also lost out on a net of $26 billion in taxable income to out-migration from 1995 to 2010. Now this… Caterpillar Inc. announced that it would not be building its new North American plant in Illinois. Finance reported: Caterpillar Inc. will not be building its new North American plant anywhere in the state of Illinois, officials with the company told local leaders Tuesday, with part of the reason being continued concerns about the business climate in the state. The company will instead focus on &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/caterpillar-says-it-will-not-build-new-north-american-plant-in-illinois/" title="Caterpillar Says It Will Not Build New North American Plant in Illinois">Caterpillar Says It Will Not Build New North American Plant in Illinois</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/caterpillar-says-it-will-not-build-new-north-american-plant-in-illinois/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Solyndra Sold Assets Cheap to Entity with Close Ties to Investors</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/report-solyndra-sold-assets-cheap-to-entity-with-close-ties-to-investors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/report-solyndra-sold-assets-cheap-to-entity-with-close-ties-to-investors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/report-solyndra-sold-assets-cheap-to-entity-with-close-ties-to-investors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ **Written by Doug Powers What’s a week without more suspicious Solyndra news? This should be enough to get us by until the inevitable almost weekly document dump that could come tomorrow. From the Washington Times : Fast running out of money, solar-panel maker Solyndra LLC last summer sold off nearly $60 million worth of inventory for less than $20 million in cash to a newly formed corporate entity closely tied to the company’s biggest investors, records show. Backed by $535 million in federal loan guarantees but burning through the little cash it had left, Solyndra made its first sale in late July to a corporate entity that had been formed just a day earlier. Three more transactions followed over the next ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> **Written by Doug Powers What’s a week without more suspicious Solyndra news? This should be enough to get us by until the inevitable almost weekly document dump that could come tomorrow. From the Washington Times : Fast running out of money, solar-panel maker Solyndra LLC last summer sold off nearly $60 million worth of inventory for less than $20 million in cash to a newly formed corporate entity closely tied to the company’s biggest investors, records show. Backed by $535 million in federal loan guarantees but burning through the little cash it had left, Solyndra made its first sale in late July to a corporate entity that had been formed just a day earlier. Three more transactions followed over the next &#8230;</p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://michellemalkin.com/2012/02/09/solyndra-assets/" title="Report: Solyndra Sold Assets Cheap to Entity with Close Ties to Investors">Report: Solyndra Sold Assets Cheap to Entity with Close Ties to Investors</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/report-solyndra-sold-assets-cheap-to-entity-with-close-ties-to-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The World America Made</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-world-america-made/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-world-america-made/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-world-america-made/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Download audio here Download Podcast &#124; iTunes &#124; Podcast Feed On today’s edition of Coffee and Markets , Brad Jackson and Ben Domenech are joined by Robert Kagan to discuss his new book, The World America Made, the importance of America’s military muscle, and how the world may change if America is no longer the world’s superpower. We’re brought to you as always by BigGovernment and Stephen Clouse and Associates . If you’d like to email us, you can do so at coffee[at]newledger.com. We hope you enjoy the show. Related Links: Buy The World America Made on...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Download audio here Download Podcast | iTunes | Podcast Feed On today’s edition of Coffee and Markets , Brad Jackson and Ben Domenech are joined by Robert Kagan to discuss his new book, The World America Made, the importance of America’s military muscle, and how the world may change if America is no longer the world’s superpower. We’re brought to you as always by BigGovernment and Stephen Clouse and Associates . If you’d like to email us, you can do so at coffee[at]newledger.com. We hope you enjoy the show. Related Links: Buy The World America Made on&#8230;</p>
<p><object class="alignleft" type="audio/mpeg" data="http://www.coffeeandmarkets.com/CoffeeandMarkets020912.mp3" width="250" height="206"><param name="src" value="http://www.coffeeandmarkets.com/CoffeeandMarkets020912.mp3"><param name="autoplay" value="false"><a href="http://www.coffeeandmarkets.com/CoffeeandMarkets020912.mp3">http://www.coffeeandmarkets.com/CoffeeandMarkets020912.mp3</a></object> </p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/tex_whitley/2012/02/09/the-world-america-made/" title="The World America Made">The World America Made</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-world-america-made/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.coffeeandmarkets.com/CoffeeandMarkets020912.mp3" length="15367730" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Air Force office removes &#8216;God&#8217; from logo</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/air-force-office-removes-god-from-logo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/air-force-office-removes-god-from-logo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/air-force-office-removes-god-from-logo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the request of the "Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers?"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the request of the &#8220;Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers?&#8221;</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/air_force_office_removes_god_from_logo.html" title="Air Force office removes 'God' from logo">Air Force office removes &#8216;God&#8217; from logo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/air-force-office-removes-god-from-logo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joy Behar: Requiring Women to See Ultrasound Before Abortion Is &#8216;Very Totalitarian&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/joy-behar-requiring-women-to-see-ultrasound-before-abortion-is-very-totalitarian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/joy-behar-requiring-women-to-see-ultrasound-before-abortion-is-very-totalitarian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/joy-behar-requiring-women-to-see-ultrasound-before-abortion-is-very-totalitarian/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ On ABC's The View Wednesday, co-host Joy Behar came down strongly on requiring pregnant women to see an ultrasound of their fetus before they have an abortion. "It's very totalitarian in my opinion" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: A federal judge in Texas is upholding a law that requires abortion providers to show or describe to women an ultrasound of the fetus before they can have an abortion. BARBARA WALTERS: And the heartbeat. J OY BEHAR: It's very totalitarian in my ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On ABC&#8217;s The View Wednesday, co-host Joy Behar came down strongly on requiring pregnant women to see an ultrasound of their fetus before they have an abortion. &#8220;It&#8217;s very totalitarian in my opinion&#8221; (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: A federal judge in Texas is upholding a law that requires abortion providers to show or describe to women an ultrasound of the fetus before they can have an abortion. BARBARA WALTERS: And the heartbeat. J OY BEHAR: It&#8217;s very totalitarian in my &#8230;</p>
<p>View original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2012/02/09/joy-behar-forcing-women-see-ultrasound-abortion-very-totalitarian" title="Joy Behar: Requiring Women to See Ultrasound Before Abortion Is 'Very Totalitarian'">Joy Behar: Requiring Women to See Ultrasound Before Abortion Is &#8216;Very Totalitarian&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/joy-behar-requiring-women-to-see-ultrasound-before-abortion-is-very-totalitarian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A $54 Billion Bailout</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/a-54-billion-bailout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/a-54-billion-bailout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/a-54-billion-bailout/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Our friends at Hertiage Action have a great piece out today that looks at CBO data and says that if House Republicans vote for the Highway Bill, they are basically guaranteeing a $54 billion bailout of the Highway Trust fund over the next five years. It’s incredible that anyone would even consider this good policy, let alone conservative. The Club for Growth is advocating that members of Congress vote NO on the Highway Bill and instead call for devolution of the gas tax and highway spending to the ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Our friends at Hertiage Action have a great piece out today that looks at CBO data and says that if House Republicans vote for the Highway Bill, they are basically guaranteeing a $54 billion bailout of the Highway Trust fund over the next five years. It’s incredible that anyone would even consider this good policy, let alone conservative. The Club for Growth is advocating that members of Congress vote NO on the Highway Bill and instead call for devolution of the gas tax and highway spending to the </p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/chris_chocola_cfg/2012/02/09/a-54-billion-bailout/" title="A $54 Billion Bailout">A $54 Billion Bailout</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/a-54-billion-bailout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freshman Rep. Ellmers Schools Henry Waxman in Committee (Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/freshman-rep-ellmers-schools-henry-waxman-in-committee-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/freshman-rep-ellmers-schools-henry-waxman-in-committee-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/freshman-rep-ellmers-schools-henry-waxman-in-committee-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Freshman Representative and rising star Renee Ellmers (R-NC) schooled far left darling Henry Waxman in committee. This was great– From the video : Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.), took on Henry Waxman (D-CA) in spectacular fashion today in a joint House-Senate hearing on the payroll tax cut extension. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Freshman Representative and rising star Renee Ellmers (R-NC) schooled far left darling Henry Waxman in committee. This was great– From the video : Renee Ellmers (R-N.C.), took on Henry Waxman (D-CA) in spectacular fashion today in a joint House-Senate hearing on the payroll tax cut extension. </p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/freshman-rep-ellmers-schools-henry-waxman-in-committee-video/" title="Freshman Rep. Ellmers Schools Henry Waxman in Committee (Video)">Freshman Rep. Ellmers Schools Henry Waxman in Committee (Video)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/freshman-rep-ellmers-schools-henry-waxman-in-committee-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suicide of the Vest</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/suicide-of-the-vest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/suicide-of-the-vest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/suicide-of-the-vest/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The viciousness of this primary season is getting totally out of hand : Rick Santorum’s Sweater Vest Slammed by Scarlett Johansson Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The viciousness of this primary season is getting totally out of hand : Rick Santorum’s Sweater Vest Slammed by Scarlett Johansson Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>Read more from the original source:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290627/suicide-vest-mark-steyn" title="Suicide of the Vest">Suicide of the Vest</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/suicide-of-the-vest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC 2012 Begins</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cpac-2012-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cpac-2012-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cpac-2012-begins/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am here at the beautiful Wardman Marriott in Washington DC this week for the Conservative Political Action Conference or CPAC. We will be seeing a whole host of conservative icons coming to speak… and the presidential candidates will be here too (Sarcasm? What sarcasm?). I’ll be covering as much as I can but there ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am here at the beautiful Wardman Marriott in Washington DC this week for the Conservative Political Action Conference or CPAC. We will be seeing a whole host of conservative icons coming to speak… and the presidential candidates will be here too (Sarcasm? What sarcasm?). I’ll be covering as much as I can but there </p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wizbangblog.com/~r/Wizbang/~3/v3r9wnEhIik/" title="CPAC 2012 Begins">CPAC 2012 Begins</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/cpac-2012-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum Is A Conservative By Reputation, But Not By Deed</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/santorum-is-a-conservative-by-reputation-but-not-by-deed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/santorum-is-a-conservative-by-reputation-but-not-by-deed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/santorum-is-a-conservative-by-reputation-but-not-by-deed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ladies and gentlemen, I don't stand here to claim to be the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney. I stand here to be the conservative alternative to Barack Obama. That's what Rick Santorum said after Republican voters in Missouri, Minnesota, and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladies and gentlemen, I don&#8217;t stand here to claim to be the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney. I stand here to be the conservative alternative to Barack Obama. That&#8217;s what Rick Santorum said after Republican voters in Missouri, Minnesota, and&#8230;</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://minx.cc/?post=326563" title="Santorum Is A Conservative By Reputation, But Not By Deed">Santorum Is A Conservative By Reputation, But Not By Deed</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/santorum-is-a-conservative-by-reputation-but-not-by-deed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Should Teach Your Kids to Become Little Tornadoes of Pain</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/why-you-should-teach-your-kids-to-become-little-tornadoes-of-pain/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/why-you-should-teach-your-kids-to-become-little-tornadoes-of-pain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/why-you-should-teach-your-kids-to-become-little-tornadoes-of-pain/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Good for her!   Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Good for her!   Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290626/why-you-should-teach-your-kids-become-little-tornadoes-pain-jonah-goldberg" title="Why You Should Teach Your Kids to Become Little Tornadoes of Pain">Why You Should Teach Your Kids to Become Little Tornadoes of Pain</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/why-you-should-teach-your-kids-to-become-little-tornadoes-of-pain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Romney charm conservatives at CPAC?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/will-romney-charm-conservatives-at-cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/will-romney-charm-conservatives-at-cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/will-romney-charm-conservatives-at-cpac/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is doubtful he will be greeted with open arms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is doubtful he will be greeted with open arms.</p>
<p>Read more from the original source:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/will_romney_charm_conservatives_at_cpac.html" title="Will Romney charm conservatives at CPAC?">Will Romney charm conservatives at CPAC?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/will-romney-charm-conservatives-at-cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greek bailout: Coalition partners can&#8217;t agree on austerity program</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/greek-bailout-coalition-partners-cant-agree-on-austerity-program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/greek-bailout-coalition-partners-cant-agree-on-austerity-program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/greek-bailout-coalition-partners-cant-agree-on-austerity-program/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Default is becoming more real by the day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Default is becoming more real by the day.</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/greek_bailout_coalition_partners_cant_agree_on_austerity_program.html" title="Greek bailout: Coalition partners can't agree on austerity program">Greek bailout: Coalition partners can&#8217;t agree on austerity program</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/greek-bailout-coalition-partners-cant-agree-on-austerity-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USDA &#8216;discrimination awards&#8217; for Hispanic farmers massively increased</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/usda-discrimination-awards-for-hispanic-farmers-massively-increased/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/usda-discrimination-awards-for-hispanic-farmers-massively-increased/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ed lasky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/usda-discrimination-awards-for-hispanic-farmers-massively-increased/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to Cook County's way of doing business: buying votes one vote at a time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to Cook County&#8217;s way of doing business: buying votes one vote at a time.</p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/usda_discrimination_awards_for_hispanic_farmers_massively_increased.html" title="USDA 'discrimination awards' for Hispanic farmers massively increased">USDA &#8216;discrimination awards&#8217; for Hispanic farmers massively increased</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/usda-discrimination-awards-for-hispanic-farmers-massively-increased/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are Republicans ‘Evolving’ On Transportation Spending?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/why-are-republicans-evolving-on-transportation-spending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/why-are-republicans-evolving-on-transportation-spending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/why-are-republicans-evolving-on-transportation-spending/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Throughout the week, Republicans have expressed their shock and dismay that we would have the unbridled temerity to oppose a highway bill.  They want to know why we are suddenly opposed to such basic things as transportation bills, even ones that will leave us with a $70 billion budget shortfall.  They are impugning our motives, charging us with opposing everything that emanates from leadership. Well, once upon a time, it wasn’t just conservative outsiders who supported the notion that we peg transportation spending to the level of gas tax revenue.  In fact, just last July, members of the T and I Committee, led by Chairman John Mica, introduced a bill that would do just that.  They drafted a plan for a 6-year reauthorization bill that would cost $230 ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Throughout the week, Republicans have expressed their shock and dismay that we would have the unbridled temerity to oppose a highway bill.  They want to know why we are suddenly opposed to such basic things as transportation bills, even ones that will leave us with a $70 billion budget shortfall.  They are impugning our motives, charging us with opposing everything that emanates from leadership. Well, once upon a time, it wasn’t just conservative outsiders who supported the notion that we peg transportation spending to the level of gas tax revenue.  In fact, just last July, members of the T and I Committee, led by Chairman John Mica, introduced a bill that would do just that.  They drafted a plan for a 6-year reauthorization bill that would cost $230 &#8230;</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/09/why-are-republicansevolving-on-transportation-spending/" title="Why Are Republicans ‘Evolving’ On Transportation Spending?">Why Are Republicans ‘Evolving’ On Transportation Spending?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/why-are-republicans-evolving-on-transportation-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CRB: Measuring the slant</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/crb-measuring-the-slant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/crb-measuring-the-slant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/crb-measuring-the-slant/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Scott Johnson) This morning we continue our preview of the new (winter) issue of the Claremont Review of Books (subscribe here — please). One of the good things about the magazine is its occasional presentation of books that escape review in other publications aimed at a general audience of intelligent readers. One such book is Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind , by Tim Groseclose. Groseclose is a distinguished professor of political science. He is the Marvin Hoffenberg Professor of American Politics at UCLA. He...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Scott Johnson) This morning we continue our preview of the new (winter) issue of the Claremont Review of Books (subscribe here — please). One of the good things about the magazine is its occasional presentation of books that escape review in other publications aimed at a general audience of intelligent readers. One such book is Left Turn: How Liberal Media Bias Distorts the American Mind , by Tim Groseclose. Groseclose is a distinguished professor of political science. He is the Marvin Hoffenberg Professor of American Politics at UCLA. He&#8230;</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/a52f9ql__Aw/crb-measuring-the-slant.php" title="CRB: Measuring the slant">CRB: Measuring the slant</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/crb-measuring-the-slant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$26 billion agreement reached to aid underwater, foreclosed homeowners</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/26-billion-agreement-reached-to-aid-underwater-foreclosed-homeowners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/26-billion-agreement-reached-to-aid-underwater-foreclosed-homeowners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/26-billion-agreement-reached-to-aid-underwater-foreclosed-homeowners/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Won't significantly affect the housing crisis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t significantly affect the housing crisis.</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/_26_billion_agreement_reached_to_aid_underwater_foreclosed_homeowners.html" title="$26 billion agreement reached to aid underwater, foreclosed homeowners">$26 billion agreement reached to aid underwater, foreclosed homeowners</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/26-billion-agreement-reached-to-aid-underwater-foreclosed-homeowners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solyndra Sold Assets Cheap to a New Business closely tied to company&#8217;s biggest investors</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/solyndra-sold-assets-cheap-to-a-new-business-closely-tied-to-companys-biggest-investors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/solyndra-sold-assets-cheap-to-a-new-business-closely-tied-to-companys-biggest-investors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ed lasky]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/solyndra-sold-assets-cheap-to-a-new-business-closely-tied-to-companys-biggest-investors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fire sale of assets to allow some investors to reap a windfall when the company declared bankruptcy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fire sale of assets to allow some investors to reap a windfall when the company declared bankruptcy.</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/solyndra_sold_assets_cheap_to_a_new_business_closely_tied_to_companys_biggest_investors.html" title="Solyndra Sold Assets Cheap to a New Business closely tied to company's biggest investors">Solyndra Sold Assets Cheap to a New Business closely tied to company&#8217;s biggest investors</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/solyndra-sold-assets-cheap-to-a-new-business-closely-tied-to-companys-biggest-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Champion Dines With 60&#8242;s Radicals</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/conservative-champion-dines-with-60s-radicals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/conservative-champion-dines-with-60s-radicals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[m catharine evans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/conservative-champion-dines-with-60s-radicals/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brietbart breaking bread with Ayers?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brietbart breaking bread with Ayers?</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/conservative_champion_dines_with_60s_radicals.html" title="Conservative Champion Dines With 60's Radicals">Conservative Champion Dines With 60&#8242;s Radicals</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/conservative-champion-dines-with-60s-radicals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FY 2012 Spending Blows Through Debt Ceiling Cap</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/fy-2012-spending-blows-through-debt-ceiling-cap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/fy-2012-spending-blows-through-debt-ceiling-cap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/fy-2012-spending-blows-through-debt-ceiling-cap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As you may remember, the debt-ceiling deal was supposed to set caps on spending. These caps were supposed to control spending, but the Heritage Foundation’s Patrick Knudsen calculates that Congress already has exceeded the caps by some $156 billion. He lists the following: The official Budget Control Act cap: $1.043 trillion. Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> As you may remember, the debt-ceiling deal was supposed to set caps on spending. These caps were supposed to control spending, but the Heritage Foundation’s Patrick Knudsen calculates that Congress already has exceeded the caps by some $156 billion. He lists the following: The official Budget Control Act cap: $1.043 trillion. Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290586/fy-2012-spending-blows-through-debt-ceiling-cap-veronique-de-rugy" title="FY 2012 Spending Blows Through Debt Ceiling Cap">FY 2012 Spending Blows Through Debt Ceiling Cap</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/fy-2012-spending-blows-through-debt-ceiling-cap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resolving Conflicting Legal Norms Between US and Foreign Courts: UVA Symposium</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/resolving-conflicting-legal-norms-between-us-and-foreign-courts-uva-symposium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/resolving-conflicting-legal-norms-between-us-and-foreign-courts-uva-symposium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/resolving-conflicting-legal-norms-between-us-and-foreign-courts-uva-symposium/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ If you happen to be around Charlottesville tomorrow, Friday, February 10, you might want to come over to a symposium on how to resolve conflicting legal norms in US and foreign courts :   The conference – organized by the student-run Virginia Journal of International Law and the John Bassett Moore Society of International Law – will explore how to resolve conflicting legal norms found in the United States and abroad, particularly as domestic laws extend their reach beyond countries’ borders. ”Although domestic and foreign legal norms have always interacted, the particular issues that will...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If you happen to be around Charlottesville tomorrow, Friday, February 10, you might want to come over to a symposium on how to resolve conflicting legal norms in US and foreign courts :   The conference – organized by the student-run Virginia Journal of International Law and the John Bassett Moore Society of International Law – will explore how to resolve conflicting legal norms found in the United States and abroad, particularly as domestic laws extend their reach beyond countries’ borders. ”Although domestic and foreign legal norms have always interacted, the particular issues that will&#8230;</p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://volokh.com/2012/02/09/resolving-conflict-legal-norms-between-us-and-foreign-courts-uva-symposium/" title="Resolving Conflicting Legal Norms Between US and Foreign Courts: UVA Symposium">Resolving Conflicting Legal Norms Between US and Foreign Courts: UVA Symposium</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/resolving-conflicting-legal-norms-between-us-and-foreign-courts-uva-symposium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Gitmo Report Reveals 27% of Released Detainees Return to Terrorist Activities</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/new-gitmo-report-reveals-27-of-released-detainees-return-to-terrorist-activities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/new-gitmo-report-reveals-27-of-released-detainees-return-to-terrorist-activities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/new-gitmo-report-reveals-27-of-released-detainees-return-to-terrorist-activities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Last September NATO troops killed Al-Qaeda leader and former Gitmo detainee in an overnight raid in eastern Afghanistan. Sabar Lal Melma , who was released from Guantanamo in 2007 after five years of detention, had been organizing attacks in eastern Kunar province and funding insurgent operations. A new report released by the House Armed Servicess subcommittee revealed that 27% of Gitmo detainees return to a life of terror after their release. Now Obama wants to release Taliban leaders from Gitmo. The AP reported: Facing domestic political pressures, the Bush and Obama administrations released or transferred 600 terror suspects deemed an acceptable threat from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, only to face the challenge that 27 percent re-engaged in terrorist or insurgent activities , according to a report by Republicans on a House Armed...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Last September NATO troops killed Al-Qaeda leader and former Gitmo detainee in an overnight raid in eastern Afghanistan. Sabar Lal Melma , who was released from Guantanamo in 2007 after five years of detention, had been organizing attacks in eastern Kunar province and funding insurgent operations. A new report released by the House Armed Servicess subcommittee revealed that 27% of Gitmo detainees return to a life of terror after their release. Now Obama wants to release Taliban leaders from Gitmo. The AP reported: Facing domestic political pressures, the Bush and Obama administrations released or transferred 600 terror suspects deemed an acceptable threat from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, only to face the challenge that 27 percent re-engaged in terrorist or insurgent activities , according to a report by Republicans on a House Armed&#8230;</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/new-gitmo-report-reveals-27-of-released-detainees-return-to-terrorist-activities/" title="New Gitmo Report Reveals 27% of Released Detainees Return to Terrorist Activities">New Gitmo Report Reveals 27% of Released Detainees Return to Terrorist Activities</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/new-gitmo-report-reveals-27-of-released-detainees-return-to-terrorist-activities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the House of Cards Starts to Come Down</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/and-the-house-of-cards-starts-to-come-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/and-the-house-of-cards-starts-to-come-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climategate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/and-the-house-of-cards-starts-to-come-down/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Steven Hayward) As John noted here Tuesday, and I have noted several times over the last few weeks, the climate campaign is suffering body blows on an almost daily basis.  The latest is the report, based on new and more comprehensive satellite data, that the ice melt in the Himalayas has been nil—zip, zilch, nada—over the last ten years.  Here’s how the left-wing Guardian newspaper in Britain reports it: The world’s greatest snow-capped peaks, which run in a chain from the Himalayas to Tian Shan on the border of China and Kyrgyzstan, have lost no ice over the last decade, new research shows. The discovery has stunned scientists, who had believed that around 50bn tonnes of meltwater were being shed each year and not being replaced by...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Steven Hayward) As John noted here Tuesday, and I have noted several times over the last few weeks, the climate campaign is suffering body blows on an almost daily basis.  The latest is the report, based on new and more comprehensive satellite data, that the ice melt in the Himalayas has been nil—zip, zilch, nada—over the last ten years.  Here’s how the left-wing Guardian newspaper in Britain reports it: The world’s greatest snow-capped peaks, which run in a chain from the Himalayas to Tian Shan on the border of China and Kyrgyzstan, have lost no ice over the last decade, new research shows. The discovery has stunned scientists, who had believed that around 50bn tonnes of meltwater were being shed each year and not being replaced by&#8230;</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/TlbLc_vXmX0/and-the-house-of-cards-starts-to-come-down.php" title="And the House of Cards Starts to Come Down">And the House of Cards Starts to Come Down</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/and-the-house-of-cards-starts-to-come-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contraceptives vs. Health</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/contraceptives-vs-health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/contraceptives-vs-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/contraceptives-vs-health/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The debate surrounding the Health and Human Services Department’s contraception mandate has too often been framed as one between essential women’s health and the scruples of some hierarchical old priests. But Catholics of all stripes are coming to the defense of the hierarchical old priests, recognizing that this debate is, in reality, about religious freedom on the most basic of levels. This view even passed the E. J. Dionne test: Dionne wrote that the administration “utterly botched” the handling of contraception with the new health-care law. He wrote , “Speaking as a Catholic, I wish the Church would be more open on the contraception question. But speaking as an American liberal who believes that religious pluralism imposes certain obligations on government, I ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The debate surrounding the Health and Human Services Department’s contraception mandate has too often been framed as one between essential women’s health and the scruples of some hierarchical old priests. But Catholics of all stripes are coming to the defense of the hierarchical old priests, recognizing that this debate is, in reality, about religious freedom on the most basic of levels. This view even passed the E. J. Dionne test: Dionne wrote that the administration “utterly botched” the handling of contraception with the new health-care law. He wrote , “Speaking as a Catholic, I wish the Church would be more open on the contraception question. But speaking as an American liberal who believes that religious pluralism imposes certain obligations on government, I &#8230;</p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290608/contraceptives-vs-health-michael-potemra" title="Contraceptives vs. Health">Contraceptives vs. Health</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/contraceptives-vs-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;This Isn&#8217;t a Theocracy,&#8217; NYTimes Editor Explains While Defending Obama Contraception Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/this-isnt-a-theocracy-nytimes-editor-explains-while-defending-obama-contraception-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/this-isnt-a-theocracy-nytimes-editor-explains-while-defending-obama-contraception-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/this-isnt-a-theocracy-nytimes-editor-explains-while-defending-obama-contraception-rule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ “ Stop Compromising ,” pleaded New York Times Editorial Page editor Andrew Rosenthal on his “Loyal Opposition” blog Wednesday morning. Rosenthal was aggrieved to hear Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod suggest the president was open to “compromise”on the administration’s plan requiring religious institutions to violate their beliefs and cover birth control in their employees’ health insurance plans. (Apparently compromise is no longer a good thing in Washington.) Rosenthal (pictured) urged Obama to make a more full-throated defense of the rule, pointing out that “this isn’t a theocracy....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> “ Stop Compromising ,” pleaded New York Times Editorial Page editor Andrew Rosenthal on his “Loyal Opposition” blog Wednesday morning. Rosenthal was aggrieved to hear Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod suggest the president was open to “compromise”on the administration’s plan requiring religious institutions to violate their beliefs and cover birth control in their employees’ health insurance plans. (Apparently compromise is no longer a good thing in Washington.) Rosenthal (pictured) urged Obama to make a more full-throated defense of the rule, pointing out that “this isn’t a theocracy&#8230;.</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/clay-waters/2012/02/09/isnt-theocracy-nytimes-editor-explains-while-defending-obama-contracept" title="'This Isn't a Theocracy,' NYTimes Editor Explains While Defending Obama Contraception Rule">&#8216;This Isn&#8217;t a Theocracy,&#8217; NYTimes Editor Explains While Defending Obama Contraception Rule</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/this-isnt-a-theocracy-nytimes-editor-explains-while-defending-obama-contraception-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Persecution of Christians</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/global-persecution-of-christians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/global-persecution-of-christians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/global-persecution-of-christians/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ From my most recent NRO article , on the underreported human-rights story of our time: “Best estimates are that about 200 million Christians are in communities where they are persecuted. There is not the slightest question of the scale and barbarity of this persecution, and a little of it is adequately publicized. But this highlights the second half of the atrocity: the passivity and blasé indifference of most of the West’s media and governments.”   Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> From my most recent NRO article , on the underreported human-rights story of our time: “Best estimates are that about 200 million Christians are in communities where they are persecuted. There is not the slightest question of the scale and barbarity of this persecution, and a little of it is adequately publicized. But this highlights the second half of the atrocity: the passivity and blasé indifference of most of the West’s media and governments.”   Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290607/global-persecution-christians-conrad-black" title="Global Persecution of Christians">Global Persecution of Christians</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/global-persecution-of-christians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top Headline Comments 2-9-12</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/top-headline-comments-2-9-12/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/top-headline-comments-2-9-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/top-headline-comments-2-9-12/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Happy Thursday. Today is the first day of this year's CPAC. You can watch the events (more speeches than you can shake a stick at) on C-SPAN....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy Thursday. Today is the first day of this year&#8217;s CPAC. You can watch the events (more speeches than you can shake a stick at) on C-SPAN&#8230;.</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://minx.cc/?post=326558" title="Top Headline Comments 2-9-12">Top Headline Comments 2-9-12</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/top-headline-comments-2-9-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the “enthusiasm gap” now on the side of Democrats?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-the-enthusiasm-gap-now-on-the-side-of-democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-the-enthusiasm-gap-now-on-the-side-of-democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-the-enthusiasm-gap-now-on-the-side-of-democrats/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A new PPP poll suggests that’s the case .   As I’ve mentioned any number of times, this is one of the polls I keep tabs on because the enthusiasm of the voting public for a particular candidate or party are key to Get Out The Vote (GOTV) efforts and election wins. PPP’s latest: The paltry turnout in the Republican Presidential contests over the last week reflects what we’ve seen in our recent national polling: Democrats are now more excited about voting this fall than Republicans are, reversing the enthusiasm gap that plagued the party in 2010. Our last national survey for Daily Kos found that 58% of Democrats were ‘very excited’ ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A new PPP poll suggests that’s the case .   As I’ve mentioned any number of times, this is one of the polls I keep tabs on because the enthusiasm of the voting public for a particular candidate or party are key to Get Out The Vote (GOTV) efforts and election wins. PPP’s latest: The paltry turnout in the Republican Presidential contests over the last week reflects what we’ve seen in our recent national polling: Democrats are now more excited about voting this fall than Republicans are, reversing the enthusiasm gap that plagued the party in 2010. Our last national survey for Daily Kos found that 58% of Democrats were ‘very excited’ &#8230;</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.qando.net/?p=12430" title="Is the “enthusiasm gap” now on the side of Democrats?">Is the “enthusiasm gap” now on the side of Democrats?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-the-enthusiasm-gap-now-on-the-side-of-democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What a Picture to Choose for the Front Page</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/what-a-picture-to-choose-for-the-front-page/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/what-a-picture-to-choose-for-the-front-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/what-a-picture-to-choose-for-the-front-page/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ You tell me your reaction to the Washington Post this morning .  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You tell me your reaction to the Washington Post this morning .  </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290621/what-picture-choose-front-page-kathryn-jean-lopez" title="What a Picture to Choose for the Front Page">What a Picture to Choose for the Front Page</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/what-a-picture-to-choose-for-the-front-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Drone Next Door: New FAA Rules Will Increase UAVs In National Airspace</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-drone-next-door-new-faa-rules-will-increase-uavs-in-national-airspace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-drone-next-door-new-faa-rules-will-increase-uavs-in-national-airspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-drone-next-door-new-faa-rules-will-increase-uavs-in-national-airspace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A new set of laws will require the FAA to ease up on the rules governing domestic drone use -- and to find a way to integrate them into national airspace alongside regular aircraft. Earlier this week, the Senate passed a bill by a vote of 75-20 that had been fought over in Congress for several years, which appropriates $63.4 billion for the FAA, and, among other things, requires the FAA to loosen restrictions on domestic drone use by September, 2015. Currently, the FAA has a strict process of licensing agencies to operate Unmanned Aerial Vehicles within the U...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A new set of laws will require the FAA to ease up on the rules governing domestic drone use &#8212; and to find a way to integrate them into national airspace alongside regular aircraft. Earlier this week, the Senate passed a bill by a vote of 75-20 that had been fought over in Congress for several years, which appropriates $63.4 billion for the FAA, and, among other things, requires the FAA to loosen restrictions on domestic drone use by September, 2015. Currently, the FAA has a strict process of licensing agencies to operate Unmanned Aerial Vehicles within the U&#8230;</p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TPMmuckraker/~3/SQgezm_SbF0/the_drone_next_door_new_faa_rules_will_increase_ua.php" title="The Drone Next Door: New FAA Rules Will Increase UAVs In National Airspace">The Drone Next Door: New FAA Rules Will Increase UAVs In National Airspace</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-drone-next-door-new-faa-rules-will-increase-uavs-in-national-airspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another HHS Mandate Primer</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/another-hhs-mandate-primer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/another-hhs-mandate-primer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/another-hhs-mandate-primer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Last night in Washington, D.C., my friends at the Catholic Information Center held a panel discussion with Jim Capretta from the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Richard Doerflinger from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and Kyle Duncan, from the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty. It is worth watching and you can do exactly that thanks to CSPAN: Link here . Start your day with it, bookmark it for lunch, have it on in the background, or at least pass it on.  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Last night in Washington, D.C., my friends at the Catholic Information Center held a panel discussion with Jim Capretta from the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Richard Doerflinger from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and Kyle Duncan, from the Beckett Fund for Religious Liberty. It is worth watching and you can do exactly that thanks to CSPAN: Link here . Start your day with it, bookmark it for lunch, have it on in the background, or at least pass it on.  </p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290620/another-hhs-mandate-primer-kathryn-jean-lopez" title="Another HHS Mandate Primer">Another HHS Mandate Primer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/another-hhs-mandate-primer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah Newest Front In GOP Battle Against Unions</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/utah-newest-front-in-gop-battle-against-unions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/utah-newest-front-in-gop-battle-against-unions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/utah-newest-front-in-gop-battle-against-unions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Republicans in Utah have opened up the next front in a battle against public unions being waged in statehouses throughout the nation. A bill introduced last week in the Utah legislature would ban government employees from collectively bargaining on any issue except for wages and health benefits. The proposal would bar unions from having a say in things like training, equipment and disciplinary procedures. The bill echoes similar measures that Republicans have advanced in the past year in states like Wisconsin, Indiana and Ohio, which have all seen pitched fights over the role of unions. Last year in Wisconsin, restrictions on collective bargaining led to massive protests at the Capitol and a Democratic effort to recall Republican Gov. Scott Walker . Now in Utah, ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Republicans in Utah have opened up the next front in a battle against public unions being waged in statehouses throughout the nation. A bill introduced last week in the Utah legislature would ban government employees from collectively bargaining on any issue except for wages and health benefits. The proposal would bar unions from having a say in things like training, equipment and disciplinary procedures. The bill echoes similar measures that Republicans have advanced in the past year in states like Wisconsin, Indiana and Ohio, which have all seen pitched fights over the role of unions. Last year in Wisconsin, restrictions on collective bargaining led to massive protests at the Capitol and a Democratic effort to recall Republican Gov. Scott Walker . Now in Utah, &#8230;</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TPMmuckraker/~3/coZ7gp06sSU/utah_newest_front_in_gop_battle_against_unions.php" title="Utah Newest Front In GOP Battle Against Unions">Utah Newest Front In GOP Battle Against Unions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/utah-newest-front-in-gop-battle-against-unions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Conservatives Support Barack Obama’s Latest Stimulus</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/house-conservatives-support-barack-obamas-latest-stimulus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/house-conservatives-support-barack-obamas-latest-stimulus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/house-conservatives-support-barack-obamas-latest-stimulus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Since February of 2009 when President Barack Obama began his aggressive push for stimulus into the American economy, he focused on one core area — infrastructure. In fact, in his stimulus speech before Congress in 2009, his States of the Union in 2010, 2011, and 2012, and his Jobs Act speech of late 2011, the President repeated referred to spending government money to create jobs to fix America’s infrastructure. Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH), leader of the Republican Study Committee, is confirmed to be leaning toward supporting the plan. His public pronouncements that he is leaning toward supporting the plan ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Since February of 2009 when President Barack Obama began his aggressive push for stimulus into the American economy, he focused on one core area — infrastructure. In fact, in his stimulus speech before Congress in 2009, his States of the Union in 2010, 2011, and 2012, and his Jobs Act speech of late 2011, the President repeated referred to spending government money to create jobs to fix America’s infrastructure. Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH), leader of the Republican Study Committee, is confirmed to be leaning toward supporting the plan. His public pronouncements that he is leaning toward supporting the plan &#8230;</p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/02/09/house-conservatives-support-barack-obamas-latest-stimulus/" title="House Conservatives Support Barack Obama’s Latest Stimulus">House Conservatives Support Barack Obama’s Latest Stimulus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/house-conservatives-support-barack-obamas-latest-stimulus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Briefing for February 9, 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/morning-briefing-for-february-9-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/morning-briefing-for-february-9-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/morning-briefing-for-february-9-2012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ RedState Morning Briefing For February 9, 2012 Go to www.RedStateMB.com to get the Morning Briefing every morning at no charge. 1. House Conservatives Support Barack Obama’s Latest Stimulus 2. President Barack Obama: “The Dependency President” 3. The State Department Staff at the Baghdad Embassy is Embarrassing Itself 4. Is Syria Really “Different?” 5. Our Constitution is not Irrelevant, Justice Ginsburg 6. What the Heck is Wrong with Mitt Romney? 7. Michael Medved Wants A Different Conservative Base ———————————————————————- 1. House Conservatives Support Barack Obama’s Latest Stimulus Since February of 2009 when President Barack Obama began his aggressive push for stimulus into the American economy, he focused on one core area — infrastructure. In fact, in his stimulus speech before Congress in 2009, his States of the Union in 2010, 2011, and 2012, and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> RedState Morning Briefing For February 9, 2012 Go to www.RedStateMB.com to get the Morning Briefing every morning at no charge. 1. House Conservatives Support Barack Obama’s Latest Stimulus 2. President Barack Obama: “The Dependency President” 3. The State Department Staff at the Baghdad Embassy is Embarrassing Itself 4. Is Syria Really “Different?” 5. Our Constitution is not Irrelevant, Justice Ginsburg 6. What the Heck is Wrong with Mitt Romney? 7. Michael Medved Wants A Different Conservative Base ———————————————————————- 1. House Conservatives Support Barack Obama’s Latest Stimulus Since February of 2009 when President Barack Obama began his aggressive push for stimulus into the American economy, he focused on one core area — infrastructure. In fact, in his stimulus speech before Congress in 2009, his States of the Union in 2010, 2011, and 2012, and&#8230;</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/02/09/morning-briefing-for-february-9-2012/" title="Morning Briefing for February 9, 2012">Morning Briefing for February 9, 2012</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/morning-briefing-for-february-9-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reinhardt’s Minimalism, Lowering the Stakes</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/reinhardts-minimalism-lowering-the-stakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/reinhardts-minimalism-lowering-the-stakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/reinhardts-minimalism-lowering-the-stakes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In contrast to Judge Walker’s maximalist opinion striking down Prop 8, it’s generally accepted that Judge Reinhardt’s opinion was minimalist. There’s a commonsense way in which the opinion is not at all minimalist. It reverses the results of a plebiscite, which followed the expenditure of $80 million and the mobilization of millions of voters. It brings full same-sex marriage to a state whose cultural, political, and legal influence on the rest of the country outstrips even its massive population. It’s by far the biggest prize (sorry, New York) in the fight over gay marriage. Advocates on both sides know this. Winning California is not the beginning of the end, but it is at least the end of the beginning. In legal terms...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In contrast to Judge Walker’s maximalist opinion striking down Prop 8, it’s generally accepted that Judge Reinhardt’s opinion was minimalist. There’s a commonsense way in which the opinion is not at all minimalist. It reverses the results of a plebiscite, which followed the expenditure of $80 million and the mobilization of millions of voters. It brings full same-sex marriage to a state whose cultural, political, and legal influence on the rest of the country outstrips even its massive population. It’s by far the biggest prize (sorry, New York) in the fight over gay marriage. Advocates on both sides know this. Winning California is not the beginning of the end, but it is at least the end of the beginning. In legal terms&#8230;</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://volokh.com/2012/02/09/reinhardts-minimalism-lowering-the-stakes/" title="Reinhardt’s Minimalism, Lowering the Stakes">Reinhardt’s Minimalism, Lowering the Stakes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/reinhardts-minimalism-lowering-the-stakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will &#8216;Known Unknowns&#8217; Put Romney into the White House?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/will-known-unknowns-put-romney-into-the-white-house/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/will-known-unknowns-put-romney-into-the-white-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael filozof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/will-known-unknowns-put-romney-into-the-white-house/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the emerging "Super-PACs" could land an undeserving and uninspiring candidate a seat in the Oval Office.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the emerging &#8220;Super-PACs&#8221; could land an undeserving and uninspiring candidate a seat in the Oval Office.</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/will_known_unknowns_put_romney_into_the_white_house.html" title="Will 'Known Unknowns' Put Romney into the White House?">Will &#8216;Known Unknowns&#8217; Put Romney into the White House?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/will-known-unknowns-put-romney-into-the-white-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turnout Proves That Mitt Really Did Scorch the Earth</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/turnout-proves-that-mitt-really-did-scorch-the-earth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/turnout-proves-that-mitt-really-did-scorch-the-earth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[c. edmund wright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/turnout-proves-that-mitt-really-did-scorch-the-earth/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt Romney's scorched-earth campaign might serve him in the primary, but it is a surefire losing strategy in the general.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney&#8217;s scorched-earth campaign might serve him in the primary, but it is a surefire losing strategy in the general.</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/turnout_proves_that_mitt_really_did_scorch_the_earth.html" title="Turnout Proves That Mitt Really Did Scorch the Earth">Turnout Proves That Mitt Really Did Scorch the Earth</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/turnout-proves-that-mitt-really-did-scorch-the-earth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarnished Halos</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tarnished-halos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tarnished-halos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j.r. dunn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tarnished-halos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behold the halo organization: a left-wing entity whose unassailable reputation masks untold quantities of internal rot. The Komen Foundation could take Planned Parenthood as an example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behold the halo organization: a left-wing entity whose unassailable reputation masks untold quantities of internal rot. The Komen Foundation could take Planned Parenthood as an example.</p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/tarnished_halos.html" title="Tarnished Halos">Tarnished Halos</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/tarnished-halos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Underlying Issue of the 2012 Campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-underlying-issue-of-the-2012-campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-underlying-issue-of-the-2012-campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-underlying-issue-of-the-2012-campaign/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though it's easily ignored, the very foundation of the 2012 elections is the angst of the American people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though it&#8217;s easily ignored, the very foundation of the 2012 elections is the angst of the American people.</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/the_underlying_issue_of_the_2012_campaign.html" title="The Underlying Issue of the 2012 Campaign">The Underlying Issue of the 2012 Campaign</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-underlying-issue-of-the-2012-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Global Warming &#8211; Now Global Sweetening!</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/first-global-warming-now-global-sweetening/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/first-global-warming-now-global-sweetening/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jim yardley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/first-global-warming-now-global-sweetening/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the same sort of academic busybodies who gave us the ever-popular global warming panic comes a new prediction of catastrophe.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the same sort of academic busybodies who gave us the ever-popular global warming panic comes a new prediction of catastrophe.</p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/first_global_warming_-_now_global_sweetening.html" title="First Global Warming - Now Global Sweetening!">First Global Warming &#8211; Now Global Sweetening!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/first-global-warming-now-global-sweetening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Exporting Democracy Subversive?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-exporting-democracy-subversive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-exporting-democracy-subversive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert weissberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-exporting-democracy-subversive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Egypt's Field Marshall Mohamed Hussein Tantawi certainly seems to think so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Egypt&#8217;s Field Marshall Mohamed Hussein Tantawi certainly seems to think so.</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/is_exporting_democracy_subversive.html" title="Is Exporting Democracy Subversive?">Is Exporting Democracy Subversive?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/is-exporting-democracy-subversive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Obama Ballot Challenges: A Crisis of Confidence</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-obama-ballot-challenges-a-crisis-of-confidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-obama-ballot-challenges-a-crisis-of-confidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monte kuligowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-obama-ballot-challenges-a-crisis-of-confidence/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reasonable doubt will remain as to Barack Obama's eligibility to be president until the Supreme Court squares the Constitution's requirements with the facts of Obama's parentage and conflicting allegiances at birth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reasonable doubt will remain as to Barack Obama&#8217;s eligibility to be president until the Supreme Court squares the Constitution&#8217;s requirements with the facts of Obama&#8217;s parentage and conflicting allegiances at birth.</p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/the_obama_ballot_challenges_a_crisis_of_confidence.html" title="The Obama Ballot Challenges: A Crisis of Confidence">The Obama Ballot Challenges: A Crisis of Confidence</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-obama-ballot-challenges-a-crisis-of-confidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Majority opposes Obama&#8217;s contraception mandate</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/majority-opposes-obamas-contraception-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/majority-opposes-obamas-contraception-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/majority-opposes-obamas-contraception-mandate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But 39% agree it's ok to violate your neighbor's conscience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But 39% agree it&#8217;s ok to violate your neighbor&#8217;s conscience.</p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/majority_opposes_obamas_contraception_mandate.html" title="Majority opposes Obama's contraception mandate">Majority opposes Obama&#8217;s contraception mandate</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/majority-opposes-obamas-contraception-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mountains in Asia &#8216;lost no ice&#8217; in last 10 years</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mountains-in-asia-lost-no-ice-in-last-10-years/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mountains-in-asia-lost-no-ice-in-last-10-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rick moran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mountains-in-asia-lost-no-ice-in-last-10-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lines up with other data that says the world stopped warming a decade ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lines up with other data that says the world stopped warming a decade ago.</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/02/mountains_in_asia_lost_no_ice_in_last_10_years.html" title="Mountains in Asia 'lost no ice' in last 10 years">Mountains in Asia &#8216;lost no ice&#8217; in last 10 years</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mountains-in-asia-lost-no-ice-in-last-10-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Persecuted for Praying to God in Saudi Arabia</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/persecuted-for-praying-to-god-in-saudi-arabia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/persecuted-for-praying-to-god-in-saudi-arabia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/persecuted-for-praying-to-god-in-saudi-arabia/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In Saudi Arabia — where religious persecution is a virtue and tolerance, a vice — praying as a Christian, even in the privacy of a home, is treated as a felony offence. And, notwithstanding the Koranic injunction against compulsion in Islam, Christians held in Saudi prisons for practicing their faith can be pressured to convert to Islam. These religious-freedom violations are playing out right now in the Saudi Kingdom. On December 15, 35 Ethiopian Christians working in Saudi Arabia were arrested and detained by the kingdom’s religious police for holding just such a private prayer gathering in Jeddah. The official charge is that they were “mixing with the opposite sex” ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In Saudi Arabia — where religious persecution is a virtue and tolerance, a vice — praying as a Christian, even in the privacy of a home, is treated as a felony offence. And, notwithstanding the Koranic injunction against compulsion in Islam, Christians held in Saudi prisons for practicing their faith can be pressured to convert to Islam. These religious-freedom violations are playing out right now in the Saudi Kingdom. On December 15, 35 Ethiopian Christians working in Saudi Arabia were arrested and detained by the kingdom’s religious police for holding just such a private prayer gathering in Jeddah. The official charge is that they were “mixing with the opposite sex” &#8230;</p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290616/persecuted-praying-god-saudi-arabia-nina-shea" title="Persecuted for Praying to God in Saudi Arabia">Persecuted for Praying to God in Saudi Arabia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/persecuted-for-praying-to-god-in-saudi-arabia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama, the Billion-Dollar Hypocrite</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obama-the-billion-dollar-hypocrite/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obama-the-billion-dollar-hypocrite/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obama-the-billion-dollar-hypocrite/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(John Hinderaker) The breathtaking hypocrisy of Barack Obama is hard to get your arms around, but Michael Ramirez takes a good stab at it: ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(John Hinderaker) The breathtaking hypocrisy of Barack Obama is hard to get your arms around, but Michael Ramirez takes a good stab at it: </p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.powerlineblog.com/~r/powerlineblog/livefeed/~3/gIKOnW0sWMs/obama-the-billion-dollar-hypocrite.php" title="Obama, the Billion-Dollar Hypocrite">Obama, the Billion-Dollar Hypocrite</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obama-the-billion-dollar-hypocrite/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: HHS Mandate Going Hawaii?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/re-hhs-mandate-going-hawaii/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/re-hhs-mandate-going-hawaii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/re-hhs-mandate-going-hawaii/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[   Kathryn : Kathleen Sebelius already intends to force exempt employers, e.g., “houses of worship,” to comply with the “Hawaii fix.” As I noted in my NRO article on this issue, she stated in the press release announcing the promulgation of the Final Rule: “We intend to require employers that do not offer coverage of contraceptive services to provide notice to employees, which will also state that contraceptive services are available at sites such as community health centers, public clinics, and hospitals with income-based support.” Keep reading this post . . . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>   Kathryn : Kathleen Sebelius already intends to force exempt employers, e.g., “houses of worship,” to comply with the “Hawaii fix.” As I noted in my NRO article on this issue, she stated in the press release announcing the promulgation of the Final Rule: “We intend to require employers that do not offer coverage of contraceptive services to provide notice to employees, which will also state that contraceptive services are available at sites such as community health centers, public clinics, and hospitals with income-based support.” Keep reading this post . . . </p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290615/re-hhs-mandate-going-hawaii-wesley-j-smith" title="Re: HHS Mandate Going Hawaii?">Re: HHS Mandate Going Hawaii?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/re-hhs-mandate-going-hawaii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keep an Eye on Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/keep-an-eye-on-ryan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/keep-an-eye-on-ryan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/keep-an-eye-on-ryan/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Tomorrow night, Paul Ryan will speak at CPAC . National Review Online has obtained an embargoed copy of the speech. It’s powerful stuff. He’ll talk about how Republicans share responsibility for the fiscal crisis. And he’ll detail President Obama’s dismal record. But the big theme is that Republicans need to make 2012 more than a “referendum.” He wants it to be a “choice.” “The easy way is always tempting,” he’ll tell conservatives, urging them to avoid a victory “by default.” Bold ideas, he’ll say]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Tomorrow night, Paul Ryan will speak at CPAC . National Review Online has obtained an embargoed copy of the speech. It’s powerful stuff. He’ll talk about how Republicans share responsibility for the fiscal crisis. And he’ll detail President Obama’s dismal record. But the big theme is that Republicans need to make 2012 more than a “referendum.” He wants it to be a “choice.” “The easy way is always tempting,” he’ll tell conservatives, urging them to avoid a victory “by default.” Bold ideas, he’ll say</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/290614/keep-eye-ryan-robert-costa" title="Keep an Eye on Ryan">Keep an Eye on Ryan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/keep-an-eye-on-ryan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overnight Open Thread (Feb 8, 2012)</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/overnight-open-thread-feb-8-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/overnight-open-thread-feb-8-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/overnight-open-thread-feb-8-2012/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are You A Class Enemy? So just how close to being in the dreaded 1% are you? Well the New York Times helpfully provides an interactive map that lets you find out exactly what percent you're in. Just enter your...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are You A Class Enemy? So just how close to being in the dreaded 1% are you? Well the New York Times helpfully provides an interactive map that lets you find out exactly what percent you&#8217;re in. Just enter your&#8230;</p>
<p>Read more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://minx.cc/?post=326557" title="Overnight Open Thread (Feb 8, 2012)">Overnight Open Thread (Feb 8, 2012)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/overnight-open-thread-feb-8-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican Military Hero &amp; First Female to Command Fighter Squadron Will Run for AZ Seat Left Open By Gabby Giffords</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/republican-military-hero-first-female-to-command-fighter-squadron-will-run-for-az-seat-left-open-by-gabby-giffords/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/republican-military-hero-first-female-to-command-fighter-squadron-will-run-for-az-seat-left-open-by-gabby-giffords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/republican-military-hero-first-female-to-command-fighter-squadron-will-run-for-az-seat-left-open-by-gabby-giffords/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This is exciting news… Colonel Martha McSally was a pilot in the United States Air Force. She was the first American woman to fly in combat since the 1991 lifting of the prohibition of women in combat. McSally is also the first woman to command a USAF fighter squadron, the 354th Fighter Squadron (354 FS) based at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. in 2001 Martha McSally successfully challenged the military policy that required US and UK servicewomen stationed in Saudi Arabia to wear the body-covering abaya when traveling off base in the country. ** Martha McSally will announce her entrance into the Congressional District 8 race tomorrow in Arizona. Here’s more on Martha McSally… Southern Arizona is buzzing with the possible entrance of a new candidate in...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> This is exciting news… Colonel Martha McSally was a pilot in the United States Air Force. She was the first American woman to fly in combat since the 1991 lifting of the prohibition of women in combat. McSally is also the first woman to command a USAF fighter squadron, the 354th Fighter Squadron (354 FS) based at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. in 2001 Martha McSally successfully challenged the military policy that required US and UK servicewomen stationed in Saudi Arabia to wear the body-covering abaya when traveling off base in the country. ** Martha McSally will announce her entrance into the Congressional District 8 race tomorrow in Arizona. Here’s more on Martha McSally… Southern Arizona is buzzing with the possible entrance of a new candidate in&#8230;</p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/republican-military-hero-first-female-to-command-fighter-squadron-will-run-for-az-seat-left-open-by-gabby-giffords/" title="Republican Military Hero &amp; First Female to Command Fighter Squadron Will Run for AZ Seat Left Open By Gabby Giffords">Republican Military Hero &amp; First Female to Command Fighter Squadron Will Run for AZ Seat Left Open By Gabby Giffords</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/republican-military-hero-first-female-to-command-fighter-squadron-will-run-for-az-seat-left-open-by-gabby-giffords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PETA Heartache: Judge Tosses Out Lawsuit Seeking Slavery Protection for SeaWorld Whales</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/peta-heartache-judge-tosses-out-lawsuit-seeking-slavery-protection-for-seaworld-whales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/peta-heartache-judge-tosses-out-lawsuit-seeking-slavery-protection-for-seaworld-whales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animal rights wackos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/peta-heartache-judge-tosses-out-lawsuit-seeking-slavery-protection-for-seaworld-whales/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ **Written by Doug Powers I’m reserving any sense of closure on this craziness until convinced the 9th Circuit isn’t going to jump in at some point and not only reverse this decision, but make SeaWorld pay the orcas reparations. From Fox News : An effort to free whales from SeaWorld by claiming they were enslaved made a splash in the news but flopped in court Wednesday. A federal judge in San Diego dismissed an unprecedented lawsuit seeking to grant constitutional protection against slavery to a group of orcas that perform at SeaWorld parks, saying the 13th amendment applies only ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> **Written by Doug Powers I’m reserving any sense of closure on this craziness until convinced the 9th Circuit isn’t going to jump in at some point and not only reverse this decision, but make SeaWorld pay the orcas reparations. From Fox News : An effort to free whales from SeaWorld by claiming they were enslaved made a splash in the news but flopped in court Wednesday. A federal judge in San Diego dismissed an unprecedented lawsuit seeking to grant constitutional protection against slavery to a group of orcas that perform at SeaWorld parks, saying the 13th amendment applies only &#8230;</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://michellemalkin.com/2012/02/08/peta-heartache-whales/" title="PETA Heartache: Judge Tosses Out Lawsuit Seeking Slavery Protection for SeaWorld Whales">PETA Heartache: Judge Tosses Out Lawsuit Seeking Slavery Protection for SeaWorld Whales</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/peta-heartache-judge-tosses-out-lawsuit-seeking-slavery-protection-for-seaworld-whales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Himalayas not melting. Panic anyway.</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/himalayas-not-melting-panic-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/himalayas-not-melting-panic-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/himalayas-not-melting-panic-anyway/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Al Gore probably won’t be please by the following story that was published by The Guardian: The world’s greatest snow-capped peaks, which run in a chain from the Himalayas to Tian Shan on the border of China and Kyrgyzstan, have lost no ice over the last decade, new research shows. The discovery has stunned scientists, who had ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Gore probably won’t be please by the following story that was published by The Guardian: The world’s greatest snow-capped peaks, which run in a chain from the Himalayas to Tian Shan on the border of China and Kyrgyzstan, have lost no ice over the last decade, new research shows. The discovery has stunned scientists, who had </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.wizbangblog.com/~r/Wizbang/~3/1ghxDUPdGZg/" title="Himalayas not melting. Panic anyway.">Himalayas not melting. Panic anyway.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/himalayas-not-melting-panic-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The State Department Staff at the Baghdad Embassy is Embarrassing Itself</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-state-department-staff-at-the-baghdad-embassy-is-embarrassing-itself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-state-department-staff-at-the-baghdad-embassy-is-embarrassing-itself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-state-department-staff-at-the-baghdad-embassy-is-embarrassing-itself/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A Tuesday New York Times  article called “ U.S. Planning to Slash Iraq Embassy Staff by as Much as Half ” purported to describe the plight of U.S. State Department employees in Iraq, whose diplomatic efforts are being rebuffed by a host nation and government that has little use for them. According to the Times , the 16,000 employees (including 2,000 diplomats) at “the $750 million embassy building, the largest of its kind in the world, were billed as necessary to nurture a postwar Iraq on its shaky path...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A Tuesday New York Times  article called “ U.S. Planning to Slash Iraq Embassy Staff by as Much as Half ” purported to describe the plight of U.S. State Department employees in Iraq, whose diplomatic efforts are being rebuffed by a host nation and government that has little use for them. According to the Times , the 16,000 employees (including 2,000 diplomats) at “the $750 million embassy building, the largest of its kind in the world, were billed as necessary to nurture a postwar Iraq on its shaky path&#8230;</p>
<p>Read more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/jeff_emanuel/2012/02/08/the-state-department-staff-at-the-baghdad-embassy-is-embarrassing-itself/" title="The State Department Staff at the Baghdad Embassy is Embarrassing Itself">The State Department Staff at the Baghdad Embassy is Embarrassing Itself</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/the-state-department-staff-at-the-baghdad-embassy-is-embarrassing-itself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dan Savage Says FRC Leader &#8216;Dances a Jig&#8217; at Teen Suicides</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/dan-savage-says-frc-leader-dances-a-jig-at-teen-suicides/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/dan-savage-says-frc-leader-dances-a-jig-at-teen-suicides/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/dan-savage-says-frc-leader-dances-a-jig-at-teen-suicides/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ While CNN suspends (or fires) its on-air personalities for Twitter horseplay, perhaps they should turn that sensitivity around on the “defamation” police that demand the firings. Dan Savage, promoted as a positive force by the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, is quite skilled at defamation. The Dallas Voice supportively reports the latest outburst, from Denton, Texas: “ Every time LGBT bullying kills a kid, Tony Perkins gets up from his desk and dances a jig ,” Savage claimed about Family Research Council president during Savage’s keynote speech at the 12th Annual University of North Texas “Equity and Diversity Conference” on Tuesday. “ Every ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> While CNN suspends (or fires) its on-air personalities for Twitter horseplay, perhaps they should turn that sensitivity around on the “defamation” police that demand the firings. Dan Savage, promoted as a positive force by the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, is quite skilled at defamation. The Dallas Voice supportively reports the latest outburst, from Denton, Texas: “ Every time LGBT bullying kills a kid, Tony Perkins gets up from his desk and dances a jig ,” Savage claimed about Family Research Council president during Savage’s keynote speech at the 12th Annual University of North Texas “Equity and Diversity Conference” on Tuesday. “ Every &#8230;</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2012/02/08/dan-savage-says-frc-leader-dances-jig-teen-suicides" title="Dan Savage Says FRC Leader 'Dances a Jig' at Teen Suicides">Dan Savage Says FRC Leader &#8216;Dances a Jig&#8217; at Teen Suicides</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/dan-savage-says-frc-leader-dances-a-jig-at-teen-suicides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Begins&#8230; Christian Leaders Vow to Be Jailed Rather Than Cave to Obama&#8217;s HHS Law</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/it-begins-christian-leaders-vow-to-be-jailed-rather-than-cave-to-obamas-hhs-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/it-begins-christian-leaders-vow-to-be-jailed-rather-than-cave-to-obamas-hhs-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/it-begins-christian-leaders-vow-to-be-jailed-rather-than-cave-to-obamas-hhs-law/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In the last 24 hours Pastor Rick Warren pledged on his twitter page : “I’d go to jail  rather than cave in to a goverment mandate that violates what God commands us to do. Would you? Acts 5:29 ” Likewise, one of the nation’s top Boptist leaders Dr. Richard Land vowed to do time rather than comply to Obama’s new HHS mandate. Lifesite News reported: One of the most influential evangelical leaders in the United States says Christians should go to jail rather than comply with the Obama administration’s mandate to provide all contraception, including abortion-inducing drugs, in their health care plans. Dr. Richard Land , president...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In the last 24 hours Pastor Rick Warren pledged on his twitter page : “I’d go to jail  rather than cave in to a goverment mandate that violates what God commands us to do. Would you? Acts 5:29 ” Likewise, one of the nation’s top Boptist leaders Dr. Richard Land vowed to do time rather than comply to Obama’s new HHS mandate. Lifesite News reported: One of the most influential evangelical leaders in the United States says Christians should go to jail rather than comply with the Obama administration’s mandate to provide all contraception, including abortion-inducing drugs, in their health care plans. Dr. Richard Land , president&#8230;</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/it-begins-christian-leaders-vow-to-be-jailed-rather-than-cave-to-obamas-hhs-law/" title="It Begins&#8230; Christian Leaders Vow to Be Jailed Rather Than Cave to Obama&#8217;s HHS Law">It Begins&#8230; Christian Leaders Vow to Be Jailed Rather Than Cave to Obama&#8217;s HHS Law</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/it-begins-christian-leaders-vow-to-be-jailed-rather-than-cave-to-obamas-hhs-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Constitution is not Irrelevant, Justice Ginsburg</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/our-constitution-is-not-irrelevant-justice-ginsburg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/our-constitution-is-not-irrelevant-justice-ginsburg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/our-constitution-is-not-irrelevant-justice-ginsburg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ If you walk by the National Archives on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington D.C. you will most likely see a line of people waiting to get just a glimpse of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution. These two aged documents are browned with time and sealed under layers of a secure glass enclosure in the domed lobby of the Archives. But they still manage to impress their visitors. The inked words of the Constitution, many of them carefully penned by Gouverneur Morris over 200 years ago, are now barely visible. While some foreign visitors may struggle to make them out, we Americans know them by heart. “We the people in order to form a more perfect union…” the Constitution starts, and what follows is one of the most awe inspiring...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If you walk by the National Archives on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington D.C. you will most likely see a line of people waiting to get just a glimpse of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution. These two aged documents are browned with time and sealed under layers of a secure glass enclosure in the domed lobby of the Archives. But they still manage to impress their visitors. The inked words of the Constitution, many of them carefully penned by Gouverneur Morris over 200 years ago, are now barely visible. While some foreign visitors may struggle to make them out, we Americans know them by heart. “We the people in order to form a more perfect union…” the Constitution starts, and what follows is one of the most awe inspiring&#8230;</p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.redstate.com/rep_michele_bachmann/2012/02/08/our-constitution-is-not-irrelevant-justice-ginsburg/" title="Our Constitution is not Irrelevant, Justice Ginsburg">Our Constitution is not Irrelevant, Justice Ginsburg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/our-constitution-is-not-irrelevant-justice-ginsburg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Promises Dems to Keep Boot on Neck of Catholic Church</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamas-promises-dems-to-keep-boot-on-neck-of-catholic-church/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamas-promises-dems-to-keep-boot-on-neck-of-catholic-church/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamas-promises-dems-to-keep-boot-on-neck-of-catholic-church/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Birth control from your church is a natural human right. Barack Obama promised fellow democrats today in a closed door meeting that he would continue to keep his boot on the neck of the Catholic Church of America. ABC News  reported, via Weasel Zippers : President Obama “reinforced” his stance on the controversial contraception mandate while speaking at the Democrats’ annual retreat at Nationals Park in Washington, D.C. today, Senate Democrats said. The retreat was closed to media. Following President Obama’s speech at the retreat, a small group of Senate Democrats, mostly women, left the ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Birth control from your church is a natural human right. Barack Obama promised fellow democrats today in a closed door meeting that he would continue to keep his boot on the neck of the Catholic Church of America. ABC News  reported, via Weasel Zippers : President Obama “reinforced” his stance on the controversial contraception mandate while speaking at the Democrats’ annual retreat at Nationals Park in Washington, D.C. today, Senate Democrats said. The retreat was closed to media. Following President Obama’s speech at the retreat, a small group of Senate Democrats, mostly women, left the &#8230;</p>
<p>View original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/obamas-promises-dems-to-keep-boot-on-neck-of-catholic-church/" title="Obama&#8217;s Promises Dems to Keep Boot on Neck of Catholic Church">Obama&#8217;s Promises Dems to Keep Boot on Neck of Catholic Church</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obamas-promises-dems-to-keep-boot-on-neck-of-catholic-church/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/covering-up-jfks-roguish-behavior-for-50-years-not-long-enough-for-nbcs-viewers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/covering-up-jfks-roguish-behavior-for-50-years-not-long-enough-for-nbcs-viewers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/covering-up-jfks-roguish-behavior-for-50-years-not-long-enough-for-nbcs-viewers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Following an NBC Nightly News preview Wednesday evening of the Rock Center promotion for a book by Mimi Alford, in which she recounts how the 45-year-old President Kennedy seduced and carried on a sexual relationship with her when she was a 19-year-old White House intern, anchor Brian Williams conveyed the distress of JFK sycophants in his audience – and admitted his family was amongst them. Talking with Meredith Vieira, Williams cited “a lot of e-mails” from people, who “sounds like a lot of us,” had a “picture of John F. Kennedy in the house when we were kids” and who are now “wondering, why do this now? Why tell her story now?” Apparently, covering...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Following an NBC Nightly News preview Wednesday evening of the Rock Center promotion for a book by Mimi Alford, in which she recounts how the 45-year-old President Kennedy seduced and carried on a sexual relationship with her when she was a 19-year-old White House intern, anchor Brian Williams conveyed the distress of JFK sycophants in his audience – and admitted his family was amongst them. Talking with Meredith Vieira, Williams cited “a lot of e-mails” from people, who “sounds like a lot of us,” had a “picture of John F. Kennedy in the house when we were kids” and who are now “wondering, why do this now? Why tell her story now?” Apparently, covering&#8230;</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2012/02/08/covering-jfk-s-roguish-behavior-50-years-not-long-enough-nbc-s-viewers" title="Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers">Covering Up JFK’s Roguish Behavior for 50 Years Not Long Enough for NBC’s Viewers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/covering-up-jfks-roguish-behavior-for-50-years-not-long-enough-for-nbcs-viewers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Wants to Ban Guns in U.S. to Reduce Crime&#8230;in Mexico</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obama-wants-to-ban-guns-in-u-s-to-reduce-crimein-mexico/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obama-wants-to-ban-guns-in-u-s-to-reduce-crimein-mexico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obama-wants-to-ban-guns-in-u-s-to-reduce-crimein-mexico/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In Obama Land if law-abiding American citizens have their 2nd Amendment rights removed Mexican drug cartel crime rates will go down. In his latest Fast and Furious stonewalling before Congress, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder revealed Obama’s desire to sacrifice our Second Amendment rights…”to improve our relationship with Mexico and reduce their crime situation”. According to  The Daily Caller , Last Thursday, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder appeared before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to answer questions about his role in the deadly “Fast and Furious” gun-running scandal. However...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In Obama Land if law-abiding American citizens have their 2nd Amendment rights removed Mexican drug cartel crime rates will go down. In his latest Fast and Furious stonewalling before Congress, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder revealed Obama’s desire to sacrifice our Second Amendment rights…”to improve our relationship with Mexico and reduce their crime situation”. According to  The Daily Caller , Last Thursday, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder appeared before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to answer questions about his role in the deadly “Fast and Furious” gun-running scandal. However&#8230;</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/02/obama-wants-to-ban-guns-in-u-s-to-reduce-crime-in-mexico/" title="Obama Wants to Ban Guns in U.S. to Reduce Crime&#8230;in Mexico">Obama Wants to Ban Guns in U.S. to Reduce Crime&#8230;in Mexico</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/obama-wants-to-ban-guns-in-u-s-to-reduce-crimein-mexico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Clinton, Rick Obama?</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mitt-clinton-rick-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mitt-clinton-rick-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mitt-clinton-rick-obama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ [Posted by Karl] My general impulse is throw cold water on momentary buzz, so this bit of hype from Camp Santorum reported by Byron York after sweeping Missouri, Minnesota and Colorado caught my attention: After the returns came in, I asked Santorum spokesman Hogan Gidley what he thought about Rich Beeson’s message.  Sure, Santorum did well on Tuesday, but doesn’t Romney have the money and infrastructure to outdistance Santorum, and everyone else, in the long run? “What an inspiring message,” Gidley said sarcastically.  “That is really inspiring.  I can’t wait to put a bumper sticker on my truck...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> [Posted by Karl] My general impulse is throw cold water on momentary buzz, so this bit of hype from Camp Santorum reported by Byron York after sweeping Missouri, Minnesota and Colorado caught my attention: After the returns came in, I asked Santorum spokesman Hogan Gidley what he thought about Rich Beeson’s message.  Sure, Santorum did well on Tuesday, but doesn’t Romney have the money and infrastructure to outdistance Santorum, and everyone else, in the long run? “What an inspiring message,” Gidley said sarcastically.  “That is really inspiring.  I can’t wait to put a bumper sticker on my truck&#8230;</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://patterico.com/2012/02/08/mitt-clinton-rick-obama/" title="Mitt Clinton, Rick Obama?">Mitt Clinton, Rick Obama?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/mitt-clinton-rick-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Don&#8217;t Do It!&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/dont-do-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/dont-do-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Blog Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conservative Bloggers News Feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/dont-do-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Pro-choice Republicans flip out over their leadership's latest stunt . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Pro-choice Republicans flip out over their leadership&#8217;s latest stunt . </p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Talking-Points-Memo/~3/LmNM2Usp3jc/dont_do_it.php" title="'Don't Do It!'">&#8216;Don&#8217;t Do It!&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.liberalwhoppers.com/2012/02/09/dont-do-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 9021/9895 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.liberalwhoppers.com @ 2012-02-09 19:06:22 -->
